8 Comments

Food for thought:

Check this out:

>> https://twitter.com/JerryDunleavy/status/1443763612535992321 <<

"DARPA is cooperating" in an ongoing "criminal investigation."

DARPA put out the contract to hire the GA TECH researchers to look at DNS data.

You don't suppose the researchers kept up their snooping for Alfa/Trump links AFTER they took DARPA funding, after the election when Dan Jones was nominated by FusionGPS to head up the group that raised millions and turned around and hired FusionGPS to continue dirt-digging on Trump, and leading to Jones 600+ page report on the ALFA bank hoax he GAVE to the Dem run Senate committee?

Looking for dirt on Trump in DNS data is NOT what DARPA paid them to do; and if they did it on DARPA's dime, and with DARPA provided data, they may have committed time-card fraud -- a federal felony. And anyone who encouraged and enabled them to do so would be guilty of conspiracy to commit fraud.

Why else is DARPA cooperating in a criminal investigation (unless it isn't Durham?)

Expand full comment
author

Right.

Expand full comment

Hi, I really enjoy reading your perspective on the Clinton email/foundation/dossier scandals. Sometimes I share your work with my FB grass roots group because we've been researching and chronicling information on those topics for the past 5 years. We have a healthy timeline going at clintonfoundationtimeline.com with close to 3000 entries and about 4700 unique tags that open up into mini-timelines. I'm writing to see if we can include some of your work in our opinion and investigations timelines. We always link to original authors (it appears we follow a lot of the same people), and even archive a copy. Would love to include some of your sensible thoughts.

Also, you should add a picture that is relevant to your pieces so when they are shared on social media sites, it makes an interesting and pretty presentation. As of now, it shows the silhouette of a head that I would guess doesn't resemble you, and the title of your article. lol Best regards!

Expand full comment
author

No problem--I'm always glad share thoughts and to be linked. Sorry I'm not to clever about the format. :-(

Expand full comment

And I'll be able to say "I remember him when...".

Expand full comment

Thank you. I can't recall anyone saying they didn't want their work shared so the public could be better informed. lol But we don't want to get in trouble over Fair Use so I try to get permission. I'm not familiar with substack but if you need any technical help on how to prep pics for your articles, I'd be happy to help. There's also a wonderful tool called Snip and Sketch that Microsoft offers for free, that allows you to snip not only clean pics, but also paragraphs out of the many various docs we pour through. So if you wanted to highlight pieces of, say, Sean Henry's transcript, this tool would be very handy for that.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks.

Expand full comment
Removed (Banned)Oct 1, 2021
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

I get where you're coming from, because as I maintained back when, all paths lead to Mueller. Not only did he cover up, but he also got the final Clinesmith FISA. And more. OTOH, it's difficult to see that happening, otoh, that's where the facts logically lead. My position has always been that Rosenstein's appointment was fraudulent to begin with.

Expand full comment