France: Crisis Of The West Continues

Macron has refused to allow a new government run by the winners of the recent election to be formed. His minority party will remain in power, he says. The majority says it will move to impeach Macron, but it’s doubtful they can win a 2/3 vote. The combined moves of the Anglo-Zionist war on the world—especially through the war on Russia and Palestine—and the Globalist attempt to take over government throughout the West—beginning most clearly with the Covid Hoax—is achieving political chaos instead. In the US, Trump is now openly blaming Zhou/Kama Sutra for instigating the assassination of Trump that failed. Events are moving rapidly.

First on the Anglo-Zionist front, the threat to control over politics in the West is leading to desperate measures. For now these involve rhetoric and political funding/manipulation (keeping candidates off the ballot). Consider:

AIPAC Officially Surpasses $100 Million in Spending on 2024 Elections

The pro-Israel group passed the $100 million spending mark in July, according to new FEC information.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has spent more than $100 million on federal elections so far this cycle, according to a review of the latest FEC data.

AIPAC’s PAC has spent $44.8 million as of the end of July, according to the FEC, with $42 million given to the campaigns of members of Congress and other candidates, as well as to party groups and leadership PACs.

The vast majority of AIPAC PAC’s spending has come in the form of earmarked donations made by individuals in the United States who support the pro-Israel group.

AIPAC’s super PAC, the United Democracy Project (UDP), has spent about $55.4 million so far this election cycle, according to the FEC. More than $35 million of that spending has been on independent expenditures for things like television ads and mailers designed to influence voters, while the rest has been for operating expenses and contributions to other political groups.

The operative words here, of course, are “so far.” AIPAC owns our elections.

Next, a long and comprehensive article by a former Italian diplomat. Critics of the Anglo-Zionist empire can’t get their views published in more mainstream outlets, but surely this represents a growing view around the world:

The US, not China, is threatening the rules-based world order

American foreign policy failures have inflicted untold misery worldwide for decades, while Beijing is now achieving tangible results

Verbal gymnastics in France. I grant that Korsia exhibits more finesse than the typical Zionist denunciations of anyone who dares disagree. He avoids the “anti-semitic” slur:

Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand

Haïm Korsia, Chief Rabbi of France, says that "the massacres we're talking about in Gaza are an act of war that are Hamas' fault" and "everyone would be quite happy if Israel finished the job".

And here I thought religious men were supposed to defend moral values and the sanctity of life 

Complete translation of what he says:

The journalist asks him if one can "participate in a pro-Palestinian demonstration to support the population of Gaza, carry a Palestinian flag, condemn the massacres being committed right now in Gaza without being labeled antisemitic?"

His response: "The massacres we're talking about in Gaza are an act of war that falls on Hamas, which isn't returning the hostages taken by Hamas terrorists, which continues to send missiles to Israel, which refuses all proposals for a ceasefire offered by France, America, Egypt..."

The journalist interrupts him and reminds that "it's the civilian population that's suffering", to which he responds "it's an act of war that no country in the world would conduct like Israel is doing, and I have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of in how Israel is conducting the fighting".

To the question "aren't you uncomfortable with the policy being carried out by Netanyahu in Gaza?" he responds "I'm never uncomfortable with a policy that consists of defending one's citizens".

The journalist persists: "I'm trying to understand why it's so difficult to also condemn the massacres being committed in Gaza".

His response: "Because they are not of the same order".

The journalist: "But we're at 40,000 deaths". He responds "yes because there were 1,200 deaths that we seem to forget... Moreover, all the countries that made agreements with Israel, including Arab countries, have not denounced these agreements. That is to say, everyone would be quite happy if Israel finished the job."

Arnaud Bertrand reports on events in France:

Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand

Update: it's now official, in a just-released communiqué Macron has rejected a government led by the New Popular Front (NPF).

It's an unprecedented situation in the history of the 5th French Republic: the loser in the election effectively rejects yielding power to the winner.

He explains it by the fact that his "responsibility is to ensure that the country be neither blocked nor weakened", arguing that were he to nominate a NPF government they'd soon be censored by parliament and destituded.

That may be the case but still this awfully inconvenient fact remains: Macron's party got way less votes and MPs than the NPF, yet it is Macron's party that's still running the French government, and it is Macron himself making choices on who can or cannot assume power based on what he thinks would "weaken France" or not. It's insane when you think about it.

Quote

Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertran

Aug 24

Quite an incredible move in French politics today that might reveal that we're in fact witnessing nothing less than a coup by Macron.

Let me explain 

3:37 PM · Aug 26, 2024

There you go: impeachment procedure launched against Macron by La France Insoumise ("France's unbowed"), the main political force in the New Popular Front coalition that won the elections, after Macron said he wouldn't honor the election results.

They also call for a protest movement all around France.

This is a translation of their communiqué (itself a reply to a communiqué by Macron where he outright rejects a government led by the New Popular Front, who won the elections):

"The President of the Republic has just made a decision of exceptional gravity. He does not recognize the result of the universal suffrage that placed the New Popular Front at the top of the votes. He refuses to appoint Lucie Castets as Prime Minister.

He invokes 'institutional stability'. It is not up to him to do this, but up to the parliament to achieve it. Yet another abuse of power! And what does he mean? Has he found another parliamentary majority available? What, or who, is he talking about?

Under these conditions, the motion for impeachment will be presented by the Insoumis deputies to the bureau of the National Assembly in accordance with Article 68 of the Constitution.

And any proposal for a prime minister other than Lucie Castets will be subject to a motion of censure.

The gravity of the moment calls for a firm response from French society against the incredible abuse of autocratic power of which it is the victim.

The Insoumis movement proposes that marches for the respect of democracy take place.

It expresses the wish that all organizations attached to democracy unite to face and compel the president to recognize the result of the elections."

As a final note, please be aware that an impeachment procedure is extremely unlikely to be successful as they'd need 2/3rd of all MPs to vote in favor of it. So their filing of the impeachment motion is largely symbolic.