A new California law that went into effect on January 1st is intended to punish doctors who spread “misinformation” about Covid—and especially about treatment options and the dangerous mRNA injections. That law has been challenged in federal court. In what follows I’ll be drawing from an article in the
Thank you, Mark, for the link & ever-present insightful commentary.
This judge invalidated the statute on 14th Amendment vagueness grounds. The statutory language was too vague to be enforceable. The judge didn't address the plaintiffs' 1st Amendment arguments. Courts avoid 1st Amendment issues when they can resolve a case on other grounds.
Also, this was a preliminary injunction decision. To get a PI, the plaintiffs must show a substantial likelihood on the merits, meaning they would win at trial after full discovery (depositions, document exchange, etc.). Whoever wins the preliminary injunction hearing almost always wins any later contested trial. Most cases settle after a preliminary injunction ruling.
The judge cited a contrary decision from a different federal judge in CA who upheld the idiotic statute. This case / issue will almost certainly go to the infamously liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Will be interesting to see if SCOTUS takes the case.
The military/Industrial complex is first and foremost about the money. It'd be an interesting study to compute the money that went to it (How many billionaires?) at Price/death rate.
I don't think the generals and other benefactors care, frankly. Col MacGregor said Ukraine losses -that is deaths- are between 137.000 and 160,000. I've not seen his numbers to be far off. Best to ya RNO! (WRH)
I've noticed that when actual science is presented, such as how chromosomes determine the sex of a human being, that the left quickly abandons science and moves on to personal attacks and name calling.
Further discussion by Turley, who's very much on Judge Shubb's side:
https://jonathanturley.org/2023/01/26/court-enjoins-californias-bar-on-doctors-giving-false-information-on-covid/
Interesting on the increase in those getting disability. And I heard from family it’s a pain to get status to collect disability…
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/smoking-gun-disability-data-reveals
Thank you, Mark, for the link & ever-present insightful commentary.
This judge invalidated the statute on 14th Amendment vagueness grounds. The statutory language was too vague to be enforceable. The judge didn't address the plaintiffs' 1st Amendment arguments. Courts avoid 1st Amendment issues when they can resolve a case on other grounds.
Also, this was a preliminary injunction decision. To get a PI, the plaintiffs must show a substantial likelihood on the merits, meaning they would win at trial after full discovery (depositions, document exchange, etc.). Whoever wins the preliminary injunction hearing almost always wins any later contested trial. Most cases settle after a preliminary injunction ruling.
The judge cited a contrary decision from a different federal judge in CA who upheld the idiotic statute. This case / issue will almost certainly go to the infamously liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Will be interesting to see if SCOTUS takes the case.
Wonder if the doctors in CA have formed an opinion about this?
The military/Industrial complex is first and foremost about the money. It'd be an interesting study to compute the money that went to it (How many billionaires?) at Price/death rate.
I don't think the generals and other benefactors care, frankly. Col MacGregor said Ukraine losses -that is deaths- are between 137.000 and 160,000. I've not seen his numbers to be far off. Best to ya RNO! (WRH)
Great update as always Mark and nice to get some positive news - especially out of California!
"Good heavens, Miss Sakamoto, you're beautiful!" She Blinded Me With Science!
I've noticed that when actual science is presented, such as how chromosomes determine the sex of a human being, that the left quickly abandons science and moves on to personal attacks and name calling.
Facts, and Truth, can be inconvenient things. This judges understanding here offers some hope. Thank you again for sharing Mark.