Ed Dowd And The Luongo Theory Of Everything
Within the past week Ed Dowd did an interesting interview with Tucker Carlson. Dowd, as most readers will be aware, is the former Blackrock portfolio manager who has been sounding the alarm about excess mortality in the wake of the Covid Regime and its heavily coerced mass injections of experimental mRNA medications. Dowd has crunched numbers available from, among other sources, life insurance companies and has now put his findings in book form:
"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022
Now, at a certain point in the interview—and I’m working from this web site—Tucker asks Dowd whether he took the injection and, if not, why not. Dowd explained his thinking that led him to reject the injections. None of his reasons constitute anything like rocket science. They are simply drawn from common sense considerations based on well known science—no deep dive required, just ordinary well informed background information accessible to all of us:
• [mRNA for “vaccine purposes] was an experimental, novel technology.
• Animals didn’t fare so well. [Understatement!]
• “Operation Warp Speed sounded like a disaster.” [Vaccines don’t get developed at warp speed.]
• It takes 7 to 10 years for a normal vaccine to be tested for safety.
• “The clinical trial only lasted 28 days. And I knew something was fishy there.”
We all know how this worked out. First of all, as Dowd points out, the rise in excess mortality due to Covid the Virus occurred most significantly in 2021—based heavily on the introduction of infected persons into nursing homes and other similar care facilities and the denial of cheap, effective, and widely available medications (HCQ, Ivermectin, failure to recommend D3 and Zinc supplements, etc.).
But then came 2022. And that’s when—after the mass injection of the population, coerced through employment and education mandates—the epidemic of excess mortality took off. We’re not hearing this from the MSM, but every day we see the sad “sudden death” stories—the word is spreading across the internet. This from the blurb from Dowd’s book, and it represents the core of what Dowd discussed with Tucker:
2020 saw a spike in deaths in America, smaller than you might imagine during a pandemic, some of which could be attributed to COVID and to initial treatment strategies that were not effective. But then, in 2021, the stats people expected went off the rails. The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18–64) was 40 percent higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID.
A 40 percent increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking. Even a 10 percent increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was 40 percent.
And therein lies a story—a story that starts with obvious questions:
What has caused this historic spike in deaths among younger people?
What has caused the shift from old people, who are expected to die, to younger people, who are expected to keep living?
It isn’t COVID, of course, because we know that COVID is not a significant cause of death in young people. Various stakeholders opine about what could be causing this epidemic of unexpected sudden deaths, but “CAUSE UNKNOWN” doesn’t opine or speculate. The facts just are, and the math just is.
...
Ask yourself if you recall seeing these kinds of things occurring during your own life—in junior high? In high school? In college? How many times in your life did you hear of a performer dropping dead on stage in mid-performance? Your own life experience and intuition will tell you that what you’re about to see is not normal.
Let’s pivot.
We now know that the persons who pushed the entire Covid Regime are heavily invested in Neo-Mathusian ideology and that a part of this ideology in its current form is a heavy emphasis on eugenics. Tom Luongo has brilliantly explained the core ideas behind Neo-Malthusian ideology in an essay that he published in May, 2022:
The giveaway, the key, is in the subtitle:
This ideology embraces a grabbag of ideas, prominently including using world government to control the climate, genetically controlling and altering human genetics by world government, universal surveillance to allow world government to control the populace, population control to reduce world population (poster boy: Bill Gates), a world digital currency to control both the populace and the world economy. The repeated use of the words “control” and “world government” is not a coincidence, nor is the name of the organization behind the idea of a Great Reset—which would embrace all of the above elements: World Economic Forum.
The basic idea—and logical flaw—behind this Neo-Malthusian ideology, including the full range of the elements listed above, update for modern times, is summarized by Luongo:
Davos has gaslit two entire generations of westerners in the Malthusian talking point that you can’t have infinite growth in a finite world. All of their economic dogma is predicated on this.
It doesn’t matter that this talking point is predicated on an inane premise. Truth is, after all treason, at this point in the economic and cultural cycle.
The key here is the idea that resources are finite, limited. Therefore, the Neo-Malthusian ideology is based on the idea of limiting growth—economic growth, population growth, and on and on. And that requires control. Total control:
Davos decided if we were not controlled and forced onto low-margin hamster wheels we would strip-mine the planet and destroy it. That’s why it needs to be controlled and real growth curtailed.
Now, Luongo doesn’t use the word “eugenics” in this essay, but it pops up regularly in his discussion of the mentality involved in the entire Davos globalist project. That is the link to the Covid Regime. We’ll pivot by citing another non-coincidence. Klaus Schwab came out with his book
only six months after the official start of the Covid Hoax. In that book Schwab touts Covid not as a disease to be treated by as “a great disruptive reset of our global social, economic, and political systems.”
Yes, it’s all tied together. And that brings us back to Dowd. In his conversation with Tucker he explains that there were people who benefited from the Covid Regime. Here’s an eye opening passage that I’ve transcribed:
"This Is the Greatest Crime Scene I've Ever Seen in My Life"
"When this Covid thing happened there were a lot of beneficiaries from it. Central banks got off the hook from what I saw as a global slowdown. They were able to print unprecedented amounts of money to cover up what we're gonna have eventually--a global sovereign debt default. It's coming. So they got off the hook. You had the tech companies excited, licking their chops for the new surveillance economy. They knew that was coming, so they joyfully entered into the partnership with the government to censor any dissent. They were excited about the future cash flows of surveillance. Then you have the pharma companies who thought they were gonna be able to make money off what they saw were unlimited vaccine, quarterly injections--that was the plan at the time, quarterly boosters ad infinitum, under the color of law. And then you had the media companies who were getting cash flows from pharmaceutical companies and also the government--we found out the government paid media companies to promote the vaccine. …
You use the term 'disaster'. That doesn't sound like an overstatement.
"No. Not at all. This is the greatest crime scene I've ever seen in my life. The greatest humanitarian toll we're ever gonna talk about, and it's gonna last with us for years to come. The economic ramifications are stark. If you see all these help wanted signs? They're from the disabled of America. We don't have enough people to fill the employment."
What Dowd is sketching out includes most of the elements needed for implementing the Great Reset. I believe the goal was to implement this by 2050—Agenda 2050. That’s been moved up to Agenda 2020. We see the rise of global surveillance—figuratively and literally. It’s happening. We see quarterly injections for all. Well, that’s run up against some problems.
But consider the business of central banks printing unprecedented amounts of money. Dowd presents that in the context of a global slowdown intended to “cover up” for what’s coming—a global sovereign debt default. I prefer to see this—and I believe Luongo’s Theory of Everything sees its this way, too—as part of a plan to collapse the world economy. In other words, "a global sovereign debt default” is part of the planning. The global sovereign debt default will pave the way for a one world digital currency that will give its controllers total control and the power to not only surveil but to coerce.
Seen from this standpoint, Covid 19 begins to look like an unbelievable opportunity. Coincidence?
It’s not possible to say so definitively. However, from the standpoint of implementing global government from a Neo-Malthusian standpoint it was clear that an American sovereigntist (MAGA) president had to go. National sovereignty is anathema to the Neo-Malthusian global corporatist elite. Can you name any other major world leaders who fall into that same category—nationalist, dedicated to the sovereignty of their nation? I can. The first two name that come to mind are: Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. And they are exactly who the Deep State and the globalist elite are gunning for, with Trump out of the way—for now.
Interestingly, we now see Covid coming back into geopolitical play. Our “intelligence” community is now telling us we can believe what we knew all along—that Covid came out of a lab, it was engineered. After all this time when we all knew that, the IC has developed a “high level of certainty.” And it probably came from China.
Now, we alluded to this the other day in Stupid Or Deliberate. Does this mean that Little Tony Fauci will finally be held to account for funding all that GOF research? Well, it’s possible he may be thrown under the bus for the greater good—as the Deep State sees it:
But the point is emphatically NOT to draw attention to the fact that, but for US government involvement, Covid 19 would almost certainly never have happened. The point, now, is to blame China. To justify … war? Who knows, but this is definitely a propaganda campaign we’re seeing:
Think back to Woody Harrelson’s “too implausible” movie script:
"the biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over." He finishes by saying that such a movie could not be made because it is too implausible.
Perhaps the business about this happening through drug cartels is implausible. But obviously Harrelson was suggesting that we all do a little substitution. So then the question is: Who was it that bought up all the politicians and so forth and pulled this thing off? And are they still at it? Is that so implausible? After all, wouldn’t we have thought it implausible—not too long ago—to imagine the US engaging in a massive terror attack on NATO ally, Germany?
It’s time to rethink our conceptions of the plausible and implausible.
You need not substitute very far to see the worlds largest (and decidedly trans-national) pharmaceutical companies as "drug cartels".
Color of law. That's the only distinction.
“It’s time to rethink our conceptions of the plausible and implausible.“ Yes, it is, especially if Scott Ritter’s pronouncement is true: “America doesn’t have friends. We only have acquaintances that we use for our sole benefit…and then we abandon them.” In this sense, destroying NS pipeline is perfectly logical.