Margot Cleveland has obtained an email that appears to confirm that SC John Durham is actively investigating at least some aspects of the DNC ‘hack’ that was a central part of the “Russia meddled” hoax. Margot’s account is here:
Special Counsel’s Office Is Investigating The 2016 DNC Server Hack
The email in question is from one of the Georgia Tech researchers who helped Raymond Joffe and Michael Sussmann cook up the Alfa Bank hoax—Manos Antonakakis. Antonakakis’ email appears to be an attempt at covering his behind with administrators at Georgia Tech, as he is being called before Durham’s grand jury. Of note is the fact that the emails and the grand jury subpoena that Antonakakis received date back to July, 2021. That means that the question that Antonakakis was asked before the grand jury, and which implies that Durham is investigating the DNC ‘hack’, derives from investigation that Durham’s team conducted before that date. In other words, Durham has been on this aspect of the case for quite some time.
It seems that DARPA—the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is an R&D agency—was involved in investigating the DNC hack. DARPA asked Antonakakis to lend his expertise. This is the question that one of Durham’s prosecutor’s posed to Antonakakis:
‘Do you believe that DARPA should be instructing you to investigate the origins of a hacker (Guccifer_2.0) that hacked a political entity (DNC)?’
Margot examines Antonakakis’ semi-hysterical response in some detail at the link (above). Make of it what you will. The important points are twofold—first, that Durham is clearly interested in the DNC ‘hack’ and has been for quite a while, and second, that DARPA—an R&D agency—was involved and was using an expert who would become deeply involved in the Russia Hoax. As for the first point, it’s perfectly logical that Durham should be examining this part of the Russia Hoax, since it was a key part of the Russia - Trump collusion and meddling narrative that the overall Russia Hoax conspiracy was pushing on the American public.
Unfortunately, we can’t be sure what the status of Durham’s investigation into this matter is. Here is Margot’s summary:
… Why was the assistant special counsel investigating the investigation of the DNC hacking?
Something caused the special counsel’s office to discover that DARPA had tasked Antonakakis with investigating the DNC hack. And something caused the special counsel’s office to question the Georgia Tech researcher about that project.
The public storyline until now had been that CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm Sussmann hired in April 2016, had concluded Russians had hacked the DNC server, and that the FBI, which never examined the server, concurred in that conclusion. Intelligence agencies and former Special Counsel Robert Mueller likewise concluded that Russian agents were behind the DNC hack, but with little public details provided.
It now appears that DARPA had some role in that assessment, or rather Antonakakis did on behalf of DARPA, which leads to a whole host of other questions, including whether DARPA had access to the DNC server and data and, if so, from whom did the DOD’s research arm get that access? Was it Sussmann?
Most intriguingly, why is Special Counsel Durham concerned with the DARPA connection and the DNC hack or hacker in the first place?
Yes, lots of questions. Including: Has Durham got the answers to these questions?
Big things happening in Durham-World:
>> https://technofog.substack.com/p/john-durham-michael-sussmann-and?s=w <<
>> https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1511183802982445056/photo/1 <<
>> https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1511186014563352580?cxt=HHwWiICyuY7r5_gpAAAA <<
>> https://twitter.com/Larry_Beech/status/1511200072318472194 <<
Durham repeatedly used the phrase "joint venture" to characterize the nature of the activity Sussmann, Joffe, FGPS, and Hillary's "campaign associates" were engaged in, in his filings with the court, referring to them as "co-conspirators."
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNgRKcdWQAEjHYx?format=jpg&name=medium <<
The question that is being ignored: who the Hell tasked DARPA to investigate the DNC "hack"?
DARPA is DoD scientific R&D outfit -- a "Boffin-Bureau" -- with neither a law enforcement nor intelligence gathering role.
The only way they could legitimately be brought into play on the DNC "hack" is if FBI or DOJ asked for technical assistance in interpreting something that was "over their heads."
We have yet to see any evidence that DOJ or FBI made any such request. Without it, somebody in DARPA appears to have gone ROGUE ELEPHANT.
Or so it seems to me.