It’s Friday afternoon. I need to get out from in front of the computer and cut the lawn. But I just read an article at Red State that raises some interesting questions. There Is Wild Speculation on Who Will Replace Sen. Feinstein — Why I Don't Think It Will Happen
Yes, but the pot-holed pavement is making way to gravel. 45 day extensions, how many times will that prove workable? Higher interest rates will drive the duration shorter, or the approved increase higher each turn of the crank: we are in the time between "gradually" and "suddenly".
"In the past we might have asked, What could the Dems promise Kama Sutra to get her out of the way?"
My 2¢
Nothing.
Kamala won't step aside before Biden leaves because Dems don't have the votes in the House to instal a Dem replacement VP. No way whatsoever Dems leave the office vacant and risk handing POTUS to Kevin McCarthy if Biden abdicates.
Kamala won't go after Biden leaves because she'll be POTUS. First woman, black, Indian, Jamaican POTUS. Senate may be cushy, but POTUS is POTUS. She's a narcissistic pol. She'll take it.
Did my lawn care work too today. Damn grass is growing like crazy in September.
Wonder how Feinstein’s death affects voting in the Senate as it would seem possible a vote could come next week on the budget. 50-49 in favor of the good guys? Nah NeoCons / Uke sympathy will win out.
Am I too optimistic thinking the Left-worshippers are first in line for these 'vaccines' and theoretically would actually become a thinning of the Progressive-Follower herd? Or, as discovered, are the fake-vaccines carefully dispensed only to the more level-headed and conservative populace? Optimistic or conspiracy theorist... what a strange world we live in these days! (WrH)
Data about the damnable injections is slowly overwhelming efforts to suppress the truth. These powerful appeals by British immunologist Angus Dalgleish suggest that resistance to the regime is growing among physicians. Still, I won’t hold my breath waiting for apologies from the scoundrels who pushed this poison into their patients. The tipping point will only come when enough of them are sued into oblivion.
Under the radar for many there has been a spate of articles lately about how few people are getting shot up now--not for Covid, flu, rsv, whatever. It suggests growing distrust in vaccines generally, and that translates to distrust of med/pharma establishment.
Interesting analysis-- except if Biden "dies" and who says McCarthy could get a nomination beyond being infill for a bit. Not exactly a loved man --except by the Dems.
You had me with 'I gotta get outta bein' in front of this 'puter screen and mow the lawn!' (yeah, I know... paraphrased for levity tho'). I got to the party late because that's exactly what I was doing when you posted this.
Regarding the loss of the fine Senator from Cali, Ms. Feinstein, I simply am reminded that the Illinois Governor was sent to jail for promises made in replacing a Senator that became President. Weird coincidence? Hmmm, perhaps not. But a fun supposition amongst some great other posted suppositions!
G'day S'21! Grace: there-in I dwell and one never knows, altho' the progressives in today's world openly reject Him and His Grace. Good to hear from you good sir! (WrH)
Thanks, Wayne. I have to admit, my thoughts have been turning more and more towards God these days. At least the Dems can't impeach him! Have a good week.
When McCarthy first became speaker, I suggested that they were setting him up to become president once they took care of "Kama Sutra". If this does happen, McCarthy would also provide the GOP with a way to get around nominating Trump. They'd lose their base but at this point I don't think the RINOs care about that if it means maintaining the status quo (i.e., the Uniparty).
In terms of #46, all the mechanations are possible. But Trump is running for #47 and he won't himself back-off. Trump's base (most of the GOP voters), won't abandon him just because Kevin McC rounded out the mouldering remnants of #46's term. A rigged GOP primary/convention in favor of Kevin McC drives schism across the GOP foundation. As to RFKjr, the Democrats won't break if he is shunted aside, if history with Bernie is a guide
I predict that Kamalaladingdong will hold out for a seat on the Supreme Court. Let's face it - she's as qualified as Ketanji Brown Jackson, and it's a lifetime gig.
That would definitely thicken the plot. That would work against both Zhou and Kama Sutra, because by rational calculations they'd be sure losers. If he does that he could really force the issue. What does he want?
Sundance argues that an independent RFKj will only hurt Trump and throw the race to the democrats. Even stranger, he casts Kennedy’s candidacy (try to say that five times fast) is a deep state psy-op to accomplish just that. What to make of this? The guy sometimes comes off as half-cocked. But, if memory serves, he was one of the only people calling B.S. on Barr’s dog-and-pony show while the rest of us thought he was the real deal.
Sundance make Tom Luongo look transparent. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. The guy probably realises that he's never going to be the Dem candidate, so the only way he gets a chance is by going independent. Trump should do the same.
He's very confident that a group he calls "DeSantis voters"--which he seems to think, in spite of all evidence, is really large--will swing to RFKjr, but I'm not so sure.
I'm not convinced of that. I would argue that RFKjr can attract the Bernie crowd with his anti-war and anti-Big Pharma positions--drawing down Dem base. OTOH, Trump probably has the ability and time to pivot on those issues. And I don't see the GOP base going to RFKjr because of his very liberal stands on typical GOP issues. Trump still owns the border issue. Not sure whether RFKjr has said much of anything on crime, which is another huge issue in blue cities that could draw away from Dems to RFKjr. But I don't see GOP voters turning from Trump on that issue.
Additionally, Trump is recognized as responsible for the best economic outcomes for American blacks and Latinos ever, in addition to wise and positive foreign policy outcomes. Known goods for PDJT versus big maybes for RFKjr
If Trump was to go independent he would drag most of his followers from the RNC to whatever party/platform he chose, but Trump is likely to stick with his Republican label for now as many of his allies in congress likely get campaign funds from the RNC. This election could realign both parties.
I think he’s right that RFK could attract Never Trump GOPers. However those people won’t vote for Trump anyway. After all, they went for Killary in 2016 and Zhou in 2020. For them, the choice will be between RFK and Newsom. If anything, Trump gains a slight advantage in this scenario.
As for the independents, I think you are right that policy-wise RFK isn’t offering everything that such voters are likely looking for (border, etc). Besides, such voters are by definition a pragmatic bunch. Even if Kennedy were competitive with Trump on policy grounds, I can’t imagine that many would “throw away” their vote only to enable the demonrat to win.
And finally, I just don’t see RFK playing the nefarious role Sundance casts him in. If anything, I imagine him withdrawing if his candidacy appears to guarantee the triumph of the deep state and uniparty. The stakes are so high (and for him deeply personal, given his family’s history) who knows, he might even end up endorsing Trump. (Now who’s coming off half-cocked?)
There is also the issue of kompromat linked to Kama-Harri ... as Mr Wauck sez ... she could be induced to leave (being a first in too many categories - first full House impeachment & Senate conviction, for instance - might quell Kammie's ardor)
It's a fairly strong argument, but otoh it's not a cert. Some other female, maybe, but she has not actual constituency. Nobody likes her--*especially* not her own party. She could be taken out, too.
LOLs. See the recent reprise of her “Russians cheated me out of my birthright” shtick? Russell Brand brilliantly and hilariously lampoons the performance:
I have heard that the idea that the Speaker of the House is in the line of succession violates the Constitution’s separation of Powers. Under this argument, Anthony Blinken would be the next in line.
“…the idea that the Speaker of the House is in the line of succession…” 🤣 It’s not an “idea.” It’s literally the law, as in spelled out in the constitution.
As for violating separation of powers… you think violating the principle of democratic representation is better? The secretary of state is an appointee — i.e., nobody voted for the guy. At least the speaker of the house is elected to his office by a majority of the people’s representatives, the closest thing to a national electoral mandate outside of president and vice president.
So, no. In the present universe or timeline, Blinken will not be occupying the oval office. Thank God.
Either that or it’s the first crack in the dam that holds back a deluge of developments they would rather avoid. This could be the start of a great unravelling.
So they kicked the can down the road a bit, but did make a statement of sorts re Ukraine. No real surprises here, ...
Yes, but the pot-holed pavement is making way to gravel. 45 day extensions, how many times will that prove workable? Higher interest rates will drive the duration shorter, or the approved increase higher each turn of the crank: we are in the time between "gradually" and "suddenly".
"In the past we might have asked, What could the Dems promise Kama Sutra to get her out of the way?"
My 2¢
Nothing.
Kamala won't step aside before Biden leaves because Dems don't have the votes in the House to instal a Dem replacement VP. No way whatsoever Dems leave the office vacant and risk handing POTUS to Kevin McCarthy if Biden abdicates.
Kamala won't go after Biden leaves because she'll be POTUS. First woman, black, Indian, Jamaican POTUS. Senate may be cushy, but POTUS is POTUS. She's a narcissistic pol. She'll take it.
Did my lawn care work too today. Damn grass is growing like crazy in September.
Wonder how Feinstein’s death affects voting in the Senate as it would seem possible a vote could come next week on the budget. 50-49 in favor of the good guys? Nah NeoCons / Uke sympathy will win out.
https://amgreatness.com/2023/09/27/researchers-warn-molnupiravir-causes-new-variants-mrna-shots-contaminated-with-dna-fragments/
Am I too optimistic thinking the Left-worshippers are first in line for these 'vaccines' and theoretically would actually become a thinning of the Progressive-Follower herd? Or, as discovered, are the fake-vaccines carefully dispensed only to the more level-headed and conservative populace? Optimistic or conspiracy theorist... what a strange world we live in these days! (WrH)
Data about the damnable injections is slowly overwhelming efforts to suppress the truth. These powerful appeals by British immunologist Angus Dalgleish suggest that resistance to the regime is growing among physicians. Still, I won’t hold my breath waiting for apologies from the scoundrels who pushed this poison into their patients. The tipping point will only come when enough of them are sued into oblivion.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/other-cancer-specialists-agree-with-me-about-vaccine-harm-but-the-authorities-still-wont-listen/
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/dystopian-world-of-the-preening-vaccine-mongers/
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Under the radar for many there has been a spate of articles lately about how few people are getting shot up now--not for Covid, flu, rsv, whatever. It suggests growing distrust in vaccines generally, and that translates to distrust of med/pharma establishment.
Except for Mr T. Remember that tough-guy "rebel"?
Good news it got published in a major journal.
Implications are terrifying.
Almost as bad:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fauci-and-cia-new-explanation-emerges
Wow!
Interesting analysis-- except if Biden "dies" and who says McCarthy could get a nomination beyond being infill for a bit. Not exactly a loved man --except by the Dems.
What a great Friday posting Sir Mark!
You had me with 'I gotta get outta bein' in front of this 'puter screen and mow the lawn!' (yeah, I know... paraphrased for levity tho'). I got to the party late because that's exactly what I was doing when you posted this.
Regarding the loss of the fine Senator from Cali, Ms. Feinstein, I simply am reminded that the Illinois Governor was sent to jail for promises made in replacing a Senator that became President. Weird coincidence? Hmmm, perhaps not. But a fun supposition amongst some great other posted suppositions!
Blessings to my fellow MIH'ers! (WrH)
At least Feinstein won't be paying heating bills where she's going.
As a privileged democrat she will demand air conditioning for her dacha.
G'day S'21! Grace: there-in I dwell and one never knows, altho' the progressives in today's world openly reject Him and His Grace. Good to hear from you good sir! (WrH)
Thanks, Wayne. I have to admit, my thoughts have been turning more and more towards God these days. At least the Dems can't impeach him! Have a good week.
When McCarthy first became speaker, I suggested that they were setting him up to become president once they took care of "Kama Sutra". If this does happen, McCarthy would also provide the GOP with a way to get around nominating Trump. They'd lose their base but at this point I don't think the RINOs care about that if it means maintaining the status quo (i.e., the Uniparty).
In terms of #46, all the mechanations are possible. But Trump is running for #47 and he won't himself back-off. Trump's base (most of the GOP voters), won't abandon him just because Kevin McC rounded out the mouldering remnants of #46's term. A rigged GOP primary/convention in favor of Kevin McC drives schism across the GOP foundation. As to RFKjr, the Democrats won't break if he is shunted aside, if history with Bernie is a guide
I know it sounds conspiratorial, but I'm open to that line of thinking.
Word has been bandied about that the Wise Latina is in poor health.
Let's hope it gets poorer. These are evil people we are dealing with.
True. She is.
I predict that Kamalaladingdong will hold out for a seat on the Supreme Court. Let's face it - she's as qualified as Ketanji Brown Jackson, and it's a lifetime gig.
The senate seat in California is a lifetime gig for a Dem. Lok at Difi.
I do like Kamalaladingdong.
Prefer Kama lama ding dong.
Lifetime is very attractive, but she needs an open spot. That can be arranged, of course, but none of the current members will make way voluntarily.
It's being reported that RFKJ is announcing his run as an independent.... Wild card or part of the plan?
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/exclusive-robert-f-kennedy-jr-planning-to-announce-independent-run/
That would definitely thicken the plot. That would work against both Zhou and Kama Sutra, because by rational calculations they'd be sure losers. If he does that he could really force the issue. What does he want?
Sundance argues that an independent RFKj will only hurt Trump and throw the race to the democrats. Even stranger, he casts Kennedy’s candidacy (try to say that five times fast) is a deep state psy-op to accomplish just that. What to make of this? The guy sometimes comes off as half-cocked. But, if memory serves, he was one of the only people calling B.S. on Barr’s dog-and-pony show while the rest of us thought he was the real deal.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/09/29/robert-kennedy-jr-to-run-as-independent-in-2024-election/
Sundance make Tom Luongo look transparent. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. The guy probably realises that he's never going to be the Dem candidate, so the only way he gets a chance is by going independent. Trump should do the same.
He's very confident that a group he calls "DeSantis voters"--which he seems to think, in spite of all evidence, is really large--will swing to RFKjr, but I'm not so sure.
I'm not convinced of that. I would argue that RFKjr can attract the Bernie crowd with his anti-war and anti-Big Pharma positions--drawing down Dem base. OTOH, Trump probably has the ability and time to pivot on those issues. And I don't see the GOP base going to RFKjr because of his very liberal stands on typical GOP issues. Trump still owns the border issue. Not sure whether RFKjr has said much of anything on crime, which is another huge issue in blue cities that could draw away from Dems to RFKjr. But I don't see GOP voters turning from Trump on that issue.
Additionally, Trump is recognized as responsible for the best economic outcomes for American blacks and Latinos ever, in addition to wise and positive foreign policy outcomes. Known goods for PDJT versus big maybes for RFKjr
If Trump was to go independent he would drag most of his followers from the RNC to whatever party/platform he chose, but Trump is likely to stick with his Republican label for now as many of his allies in congress likely get campaign funds from the RNC. This election could realign both parties.
I think he’s right that RFK could attract Never Trump GOPers. However those people won’t vote for Trump anyway. After all, they went for Killary in 2016 and Zhou in 2020. For them, the choice will be between RFK and Newsom. If anything, Trump gains a slight advantage in this scenario.
As for the independents, I think you are right that policy-wise RFK isn’t offering everything that such voters are likely looking for (border, etc). Besides, such voters are by definition a pragmatic bunch. Even if Kennedy were competitive with Trump on policy grounds, I can’t imagine that many would “throw away” their vote only to enable the demonrat to win.
And finally, I just don’t see RFK playing the nefarious role Sundance casts him in. If anything, I imagine him withdrawing if his candidacy appears to guarantee the triumph of the deep state and uniparty. The stakes are so high (and for him deeply personal, given his family’s history) who knows, he might even end up endorsing Trump. (Now who’s coming off half-cocked?)
I don't believe Kamala would willingly step down.
She will not miss the chance to be the first female president.
She should be used to willingly stepping down. Ask Willy.
that's willingly kneel down........
How to put this delicately: she has proved that her considerable services are for sale at the right price.
There is also the issue of kompromat linked to Kama-Harri ... as Mr Wauck sez ... she could be induced to leave (being a first in too many categories - first full House impeachment & Senate conviction, for instance - might quell Kammie's ardor)
or maybe any price.......
It's a fairly strong argument, but otoh it's not a cert. Some other female, maybe, but she has not actual constituency. Nobody likes her--*especially* not her own party. She could be taken out, too.
Hillary is still waving her hands in the air, yelling, "Pick me! Pick me!"
Well, it is her turn. As it has been since 1781.
LOLs. See the recent reprise of her “Russians cheated me out of my birthright” shtick? Russell Brand brilliantly and hilariously lampoons the performance:
https://youtu.be/JIMGfhRj1KY?si=DMs_SOGAPezm_t5R
I have heard that the idea that the Speaker of the House is in the line of succession violates the Constitution’s separation of Powers. Under this argument, Anthony Blinken would be the next in line.
LOL! However, the potential for one helluva mess does exist.
Ain't it grand? A rare bit of levity in this bleak world.
“…the idea that the Speaker of the House is in the line of succession…” 🤣 It’s not an “idea.” It’s literally the law, as in spelled out in the constitution.
As for violating separation of powers… you think violating the principle of democratic representation is better? The secretary of state is an appointee — i.e., nobody voted for the guy. At least the speaker of the house is elected to his office by a majority of the people’s representatives, the closest thing to a national electoral mandate outside of president and vice president.
So, no. In the present universe or timeline, Blinken will not be occupying the oval office. Thank God.
Either that or it’s the first crack in the dam that holds back a deluge of developments they would rather avoid. This could be the start of a great unravelling.