Here’s a useful clarification of an important (and basic) legal point involving the prosecution of conspiracies. A twitter follower over at Doc SWC raises a pertinent question—which SWC answers. DNS records are non-public. But is it a crime to spy on them, i.e., capture them, and use them for whatever purpose you desire? Probably not but, says SWC, that’s not the real point. If the capture of the DNS records is part of the larger conspiracy—and, IMO, there’s no real doubt of that—then that activity becomes one of those overt acts
Please do not ignore the fraud on the FISA court, the turnover of Carter Page's and the two hop communication records from the NSA which ended up in the hands of PRIVATE contractors working for HRC.
The pattern of conduct indicated to me an attempt to assure permanent control over selection of the Presidency by the Democratic elite.
IMO Hillary Clinton floating the idea of running for POTUS again is a clear signal to those in the government that if they value their careers they should do everything that they can to help her to avoid any responsibility for her actions or the actions of others who assisted her. No one takes her serious about running again.
How many vans would she have to be thrown into like a side of beef if she tried to campaign for a year plus? One imagines a video of a pantsuited sociopath being tossed into one van after another at campaign stop after campaign stop, each summary exit from the scene in time with a dramatic beat from Tchaikovsky's 1812 overture.
Mark,
Please do not ignore the fraud on the FISA court, the turnover of Carter Page's and the two hop communication records from the NSA which ended up in the hands of PRIVATE contractors working for HRC.
The pattern of conduct indicated to me an attempt to assure permanent control over selection of the Presidency by the Democratic elite.
How could you suggest that I've ignored the FISA angle? I've written about it till I was almost blue in the face.
IMO Hillary Clinton floating the idea of running for POTUS again is a clear signal to those in the government that if they value their careers they should do everything that they can to help her to avoid any responsibility for her actions or the actions of others who assisted her. No one takes her serious about running again.
Re Hillary running again: How many times? Depends upon how much Chateau Box she has stashed in the Chappaqua woods...
Knowing HRC's personality, history, and utter lack of shame, I would suspect her answer to that question is "As many times as I need to."
How many vans would she have to be thrown into like a side of beef if she tried to campaign for a year plus? One imagines a video of a pantsuited sociopath being tossed into one van after another at campaign stop after campaign stop, each summary exit from the scene in time with a dramatic beat from Tchaikovsky's 1812 overture.
Trump campaign should hold "van tossing" contests to see who can toss an elderly woman in the most colorful fashion into a van.