UPDATED: Dabney Friedrich: Mueller's Dossier Violated Rules Of Criminal Procedure
meaninginhistory.substack.com
Judge Dabney Friedrich, the trial judge in the SDNY who is handling the Concord Management ‘Russian troll farm’ trial has administered a spanking to Robert Mueller--as well as to AG Bill Barr. In effect, Judge Friedrich's ruling that was released today holds that Mueller--and Barr--must refrain from making any statements that suggest that Concord Management (Concord) acted in concert with the Russian government in its alleged “information warfare” campaign on social media and at political rallies to sow discord among U.S. voters in advance of the 2016 presidential election. The significance of this ruling is that the Concord case is a major part of the contention in the Mueller Dossier that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election. In other words, the judge's ruling, in effect, orders the government to stop stating--or at least to stop citing the Concord case in support of--that counter factual assertion. Here are the details.
UPDATED: Dabney Friedrich: Mueller's Dossier Violated Rules Of Criminal Procedure
UPDATED: Dabney Friedrich: Mueller's Dossier…
UPDATED: Dabney Friedrich: Mueller's Dossier Violated Rules Of Criminal Procedure
Judge Dabney Friedrich, the trial judge in the SDNY who is handling the Concord Management ‘Russian troll farm’ trial has administered a spanking to Robert Mueller--as well as to AG Bill Barr. In effect, Judge Friedrich's ruling that was released today holds that Mueller--and Barr--must refrain from making any statements that suggest that Concord Management (Concord) acted in concert with the Russian government in its alleged “information warfare” campaign on social media and at political rallies to sow discord among U.S. voters in advance of the 2016 presidential election. The significance of this ruling is that the Concord case is a major part of the contention in the Mueller Dossier that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election. In other words, the judge's ruling, in effect, orders the government to stop stating--or at least to stop citing the Concord case in support of--that counter factual assertion. Here are the details.