On November 21 I published Warning: Danger Ahead, which discussed the implications of findings from a study by a prominent cardiologist, Steven R. Gundry. This excerpt will tell you what you need to know for what follows:
MRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Circulation (Medical Journal) ^ | 8 Nov 2021 | Steven R Gundry
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results.
In plain English, Gundry’s findings—using a standard cardiac test—strongly suggest exactly what others have been saying: Covid is primarily a vascular disease and the vaccines appear to mimic the action of the disease, leading to “vascular events”—i.e., heart attacks, strokes, and so forth. To call these “adverse events” “side effects” isn’t truly accurate, because these findings suggest a direct causal link between these events and the vaccines.
You can find a related discussion at Alex Berenson’s substack:
A frightening new potential explanation for vaccine-driven myocarditis and other problems
Researchers in the New England Journal of Medicine raise the possibility of an uncontrolled autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein that may last indefinitely
However, this afternoon I came across a discussion of Gundry’s findings by a very prominent cardiologist, Aseem Malhotra, on the UK’s GB News. I’m embedding the Youtube of the video (there’s a discussion/summary at Evidence of heart disease after COVID shot exists but isn’t published out of fear, cardiologist says), but I was so struck by the discussion that I’ve included a transcript, below:
TRANSCRIPT: After seeing this abstract publication [by cardiac surgeon Stephen Gundry] I was concerned, and for a number of reasons. First and foremost, we have to understand that there's been a shift in understanding of heart disease over the years. We know now that it's a chronic inflammatory condition that is exacerbated by some [?], which we've talked about on the show before--which is related to poor lifestyle. What this research has shown is that markers associated with increasing the risk of heart attack--and probably even progression of heart disease in people who already have some heart disease--has seen significantly increased risk from 11% for five years, risk of heart attack, to 25%. Now, that's a huuuuuge increase. If this is true, then it's very concerning indeed. But in medicine, in good science, we never rely on one study--we need to replicate these findings.
However, what I will share with you today on GB News is, a few days ago, after this was published, someone from a very prestigious British institution--cardiology department, researcher, whistleblower if you like--contacted me to say that researchers in this department had found something similar within the coronary arteries linked to the vaccine--inflammation from imaging studies--around the coronary arteries. They had a meeting and these researchers at the moment have decided that they're not gonna publish their findings because they are concerned about losing research funding from the drug industry. Now, this person was very upset about it and I wanted to share this on GB News today.
What I would say, knowing this information, which is very concerning, Steven Gundry's paper in Circulation, and also anecdotal evidence--I mean, I have a lot of interaction with the cardiology community across the UK--and anecdotally I'm being told by colleagues that they're seeing younger and younger people coming in with heart attacks.
Now, what does this mean in terms of the data? We have to put the pieces of the jigsaw together. We know that since July there's been nearly 10,000 excess non-Covid deaths, and most of those--a significant proportion of those--have been driven by circulatory disease. In other words, heart attacks and stroke. There's been a 30% increase in people dying at home, and often these are because of cardiac arrests. And also, this is something close to my heart, because my own father is one of those statistics. He had a cardiac arrest at home July the 26th, so since this data's been collected.
So, where do we go from here? I think the signal is quite strong. I personally think that this needs investigating, so the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunizations should absolutely investigate this. I think that the researchers, I really hope that they take a look in the mirror and realize--the ones from where this whistleblower comes from--that they should publish this stuff, because their duty primarily is to patients, not the interests of the drug industry. And I think the third thing--and this has been a discussion that's been ongoing--I think that now it's high time that policy makers around the world put an end to the mandates. Because I think that if this signal is strong and if it's correct then history will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it, Alex.
So, this is very concerning, it needs investigating, and hopefully it can be resolved very soon. I think that the other thing to mention is that we shouldn't ignore the other possibilities of why there's been an increase in heart attacks. So part of the thing that I've done in my research [] the years is looking at the lifestyle factors that drive heart disease and heart attacks. The other things that we also know have happened, which also I'm sure are contributing factors, is people's diets in general got worse over the lockdown, and and there was pandemic stress. Chronic psychological stress is a significant risk factor. So, if it wasn't for this data that's come out recently I would've actually have attributed most of these excess deaths from heart disease to those lifestyle factors. Now that the vaccine has been thrown in to the equation we can't ignore it.
I began reading Bobby Kennedy‘s new book on Dr. Fauci. I was only into it by about 140 pages and I gave it to someone on Thanksgiving that was considering taking a booster in the hopes that she will reconsider. It’s completely shocking some of the stuff, but a lot of us have already seen the evidence either here with marks revelations or through other folks like Denninger. Although I think Kennedy‘s book is got a lot of things right, I think he does not quite see the big picture, even though he seems to point everything at money and corruption. Even so, I think he’s spot on with all the folks that are unwilling to stand up to Fauci in the medical field because they are captive to his organization given all the money that Fauci is able to wield as power to keep them in check.
As an example, a friend of mine knows someone who does audits on people that work at CDC and FDA to ensure they don’t have inappropriate investments that would be a conflict of interest. However, after reading chapter 2, it seems that all that is a drop in the ocean compared to the unbelievable collusion between our government agencies and pharma. I was quite surprised to see that all the monies that are collected on behalf of Fauci are in the billions (such as patent royalties and fees) which allows him to not only control what gets studied and evaluated, but who gets to do it whicj allows Dr. Fauci a unbelievable amount of control over these people since they are beholden to funding for their studies. Although I did give the book away, I ordered another one which is due in tomorrow. Here’s hoping she doesn’t take a booster after reading the book and also seeing the insanity going on with the new Omicron variant
It's so pathetic that none of the corporate U.S. media, none, are bringing us this story. How do they sleep with anything less than a handful of pills?