I've wondered if the risky experiments funded by Fauci's cutouts in the U.S. and Wuhan were not done in pursuit of a plausibly reliable corona vaccine ala 'flu
And then West Taiwan's typical biohazard safety standards went "oopsie " again. ( Didn't we get a MERS or a bad 'flu from a Peking lab leak several years ago? Or am I remembering wrongly?)
We just need an explanation for all the patents and all the chimeras that precede the actual wild virus and all the BS cover "measures" including mass injection with an experimental gene therapy all as purportedly the "expert" , "scientific" response to a supposedly "novel" coronavirus. Not one single bit of it adds up as genuine.
Thanks for nothing. Here's what el gato malo actually says:
"this is also a novel modality in which SARSCOV-2’s spike protein is cultured in moth cells and then injected as “nanoparticles” to induce an immune response and generate antigenic training. contrary to what many seem to think, it is not a whole virus vaccine.
"it might have some better potential to generate early and possibly sterilizing immunity because it’s training to recognize actual S protein so your immune system will respond to live virus instead of to the effects of virus once it has infected cells as in mRNA vaccines.
"it seems more likely to induce wider T-cell involvement. overall, at least in theory, this seems like it could be a better modality than previous vaccines, but the data as it gets out into the real world will be hard to predict."
OT , but Mark, are you tracking this latest in the Durham chronicles? https://twitter.com/MCD01792335/status/1495046579434123267?t=umS3lS86a9Y92dUMmiLWxg&s=19
Eh, not really.
if vaccines for corona viruses worked we'd have had one years ago. They don't and won't.
I've wondered if the risky experiments funded by Fauci's cutouts in the U.S. and Wuhan were not done in pursuit of a plausibly reliable corona vaccine ala 'flu
And then West Taiwan's typical biohazard safety standards went "oopsie " again. ( Didn't we get a MERS or a bad 'flu from a Peking lab leak several years ago? Or am I remembering wrongly?)
We just need an explanation for all the patents and all the chimeras that precede the actual wild virus and all the BS cover "measures" including mass injection with an experimental gene therapy all as purportedly the "expert" , "scientific" response to a supposedly "novel" coronavirus. Not one single bit of it adds up as genuine.
Right. We'd also have had one that worked against flu.
It's true that there have been several SARS outbreaks from Chinese labs over the years, including in the Beijing area.
The Great Reset by any other name would smell as rank.
Thanks for nothing. Here's what el gato malo actually says:
"this is also a novel modality in which SARSCOV-2’s spike protein is cultured in moth cells and then injected as “nanoparticles” to induce an immune response and generate antigenic training. contrary to what many seem to think, it is not a whole virus vaccine.
"it might have some better potential to generate early and possibly sterilizing immunity because it’s training to recognize actual S protein so your immune system will respond to live virus instead of to the effects of virus once it has infected cells as in mRNA vaccines.
"it seems more likely to induce wider T-cell involvement. overall, at least in theory, this seems like it could be a better modality than previous vaccines, but the data as it gets out into the real world will be hard to predict."
Good enough for uninformed commenting and slandering other commenters. I doubt that any of them are on board with that.