Sometimes hanging is called for. At a minimum.Thanks for reading Meaning In History! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Report: 44 Percent of Pregnant Women in Pfizer Trial Lost Their Babies; FDA and CDC Recommended Jabs For Expectant Mothers Anyway
Still a problem, but as he points out, we would have noticed half of all babies miscarrying. But also points out the more likely 5-10% would only show up in national databases.
Maybe that's it. Actually I don't know either. Are they actually the same guy made up to look a little different but do the same damage to the United States of America?
You were extraordinarily lucky, given the hard data now being surfaced. The numbers of vaccine related injuries are still not fully understood and likely wont be for another year.
But - and it is a harsh, cold reality - millions have permanently compromised their immune system, or those of their kids.
Remember Enron? The result of which was Sarbanes-Oxley, which made corporate executives PERSONALLY responsible for the accuracy of their companies financial reporting - so that they would not defraud investors? Isn't it time to make corporate executives PERSONALLY responsible for harms knowingly done to the consumers of their products? Especially when it cost those consumers their lives? I don't understand how wearing a suit protects you from wearing a prison uniform.
Do you know any recently pregnant moms? Their doctor’s recommend no eating LUNCH MEAT! LUNCH MEAT! But these poor mothers were forced, cajoled, shamed to take an EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY! How awful!!! 😡
Yes..all kinds of odd food restrictions now. But go ahead and put experimental gene therapy into your body.
My daughter was pregnant during all this, and was being pressured all the time by a Kaiser nurse who told her she could die without the shot, and she couldn’t bear the thought of losing one more pregnant mother. Psychological manipulation at its finest. She underestimated my daughters nerves of steel. After 3 failed attempts to browbeat her into submission, my daughter complained and got a different nurse.
It's worse than that. The CDC's study states that out of 827 completed pregnancies, 104 spontaneous abortions (miscarriage) occurred--about the normal rate. However, only 127 participants received the vax during the 1st and 2nd trimester. If the baby expires in the 3rd trimester, it is not termed miscarriage, it is termed stillbirth. That means that all 104 of those miscarriages occurred to the 127 moms who got the shot in the first two trimesters, a rate of 81.9%.
PatriotsD - I recall that same important re-organization of the key data and how it changed the spin the fraudsters were seeking, and revealed the truth; do you mind either linking to the author that spotted and revealed that, or if you went to the source docs, can you share it here? I tried finding where I read that several months ago, and cannot anymore.
The author was Liza Greve, head of Oklahomans for Health and Parental Rights, in an August 2021 email. The OKHPR website has no search feature, so I don't know how to help with that further. Here is what she said:
"There is a published study out of the NEJM that claims it’s preliminary data proves that the COVID vax is “safe” for pregnant women. This is a demonstrably false conclusion when the data are looked at logically.
The study claims that out of 827 completed pregnancies, only 104 spontaneous abortions (miscarriage) occurred. This is true on the surface and looks to match the normal rate of miscarriage.
However, it is also noted that 700 of those participants received their dose during the THIRD trimester. Interesting. This means that only 127 participants received the vax during the 1st and 2nd trimester, which is when all miscarriages occur. So in reality, there were 104 miscarriages out of 127 participants who were vaccinated during the first two trimesters. That is a miscarriage rate of 81.9%. "
Hi PatriotsDream, I remember reading about the study you are describing here. It was done by the CDC using V-safe and VAERS data, from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021, and it's frightening enough...
But it sounds like Naomi Wolf is referring to a different data set, kept by Pfizer, with a March 13, 2021 cutoff for followup on pregnant women.
Whaddaya gunna do? First place, stay unique. If worse comes to worse, I can play at being obsequious. I did it in the Army, and I can be a real good Uriah Heap. But I stay Me. Don't have guns, but I do have religion, and a family and a few friends. I also think we have a fighter in Trump, and he is a lot smarter than the bums currently in power. Now he has he goods on them and they ain't getting off the hook. With MAGA we still have a chance to throw the bums out. They be afraid, and what they are doing ain't smart. Sorry to say, they are going to cause a lot more pain and discontent and when the Recession turns into a Depression a lot more of the population is going to hope for a change.
Alex Berenson updates on some problems with that 44% figure :
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1560002148510965764
Still a problem, but as he points out, we would have noticed half of all babies miscarrying. But also points out the more likely 5-10% would only show up in national databases.
O/T
Riddle me this:
What is the difference between Hillary Clinton and Liz Cheney?
Liz Cheney looks nicer in unnaturally blonde hair? Hillary tells lies more smoothly, and with greater cunning? Thinking...
Maybe that's it. Actually I don't know either. Are they actually the same guy made up to look a little different but do the same damage to the United States of America?
I received my phizer booster shot while I was 16 weeks pregnant and I have a perfect, beautiful little boy
You were extraordinarily lucky, given the hard data now being surfaced. The numbers of vaccine related injuries are still not fully understood and likely wont be for another year.
But - and it is a harsh, cold reality - millions have permanently compromised their immune system, or those of their kids.
Congratulations - unfortunately not everyone is as lucky. The fall in birth rate in highly vaccinated countries, plus this study are beyond the pale.
Remember Enron? The result of which was Sarbanes-Oxley, which made corporate executives PERSONALLY responsible for the accuracy of their companies financial reporting - so that they would not defraud investors? Isn't it time to make corporate executives PERSONALLY responsible for harms knowingly done to the consumers of their products? Especially when it cost those consumers their lives? I don't understand how wearing a suit protects you from wearing a prison uniform.
Do you know any recently pregnant moms? Their doctor’s recommend no eating LUNCH MEAT! LUNCH MEAT! But these poor mothers were forced, cajoled, shamed to take an EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY! How awful!!! 😡
Yes..all kinds of odd food restrictions now. But go ahead and put experimental gene therapy into your body.
My daughter was pregnant during all this, and was being pressured all the time by a Kaiser nurse who told her she could die without the shot, and she couldn’t bear the thought of losing one more pregnant mother. Psychological manipulation at its finest. She underestimated my daughters nerves of steel. After 3 failed attempts to browbeat her into submission, my daughter complained and got a different nurse.
It’s little things like that which give me hope.
It's worse than that. The CDC's study states that out of 827 completed pregnancies, 104 spontaneous abortions (miscarriage) occurred--about the normal rate. However, only 127 participants received the vax during the 1st and 2nd trimester. If the baby expires in the 3rd trimester, it is not termed miscarriage, it is termed stillbirth. That means that all 104 of those miscarriages occurred to the 127 moms who got the shot in the first two trimesters, a rate of 81.9%.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
PatriotsD - I recall that same important re-organization of the key data and how it changed the spin the fraudsters were seeking, and revealed the truth; do you mind either linking to the author that spotted and revealed that, or if you went to the source docs, can you share it here? I tried finding where I read that several months ago, and cannot anymore.
Thanks.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
The author was Liza Greve, head of Oklahomans for Health and Parental Rights, in an August 2021 email. The OKHPR website has no search feature, so I don't know how to help with that further. Here is what she said:
"There is a published study out of the NEJM that claims it’s preliminary data proves that the COVID vax is “safe” for pregnant women. This is a demonstrably false conclusion when the data are looked at logically.
The study claims that out of 827 completed pregnancies, only 104 spontaneous abortions (miscarriage) occurred. This is true on the surface and looks to match the normal rate of miscarriage.
However, it is also noted that 700 of those participants received their dose during the THIRD trimester. Interesting. This means that only 127 participants received the vax during the 1st and 2nd trimester, which is when all miscarriages occur. So in reality, there were 104 miscarriages out of 127 participants who were vaccinated during the first two trimesters. That is a miscarriage rate of 81.9%. "
Hi PatriotsDream, I remember reading about the study you are describing here. It was done by the CDC using V-safe and VAERS data, from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021, and it's frightening enough...
But it sounds like Naomi Wolf is referring to a different data set, kept by Pfizer, with a March 13, 2021 cutoff for followup on pregnant women.
I shall edit my comment to reflect the correct study.
Whaddaya gunna do? First place, stay unique. If worse comes to worse, I can play at being obsequious. I did it in the Army, and I can be a real good Uriah Heap. But I stay Me. Don't have guns, but I do have religion, and a family and a few friends. I also think we have a fighter in Trump, and he is a lot smarter than the bums currently in power. Now he has he goods on them and they ain't getting off the hook. With MAGA we still have a chance to throw the bums out. They be afraid, and what they are doing ain't smart. Sorry to say, they are going to cause a lot more pain and discontent and when the Recession turns into a Depression a lot more of the population is going to hope for a change.