I forget exactly why, but the question of what was behind the mass killing at the Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas (almost exactly 5 years ago) recurred to me during the last week or two.
I've seen a few posts on socials questioning the narrative about this incident; about the hotel windows - re-enforced glass that can't open, something about the bullet casings, something else about the officers who went up to the room. I've no clue but there is something phooey about blaming it on ISIS affiliation after 5 years.
I also believe we should take a second look at the anthrax attacks of 2001. Bob Mueller of the FBI took all of a morning to decide it couldn't possible be Al Qaeda/Sadaam Hussein. He then spent years investigating an innocent man (Steve Hatfill) and finally fingered as the culprit an unstable man who committed suicide.
But the Antifa angle is also rejected--no motivation. And he did, apparently, have jihadi linked contacts. I have an open mind on this one--except that I do think there was some motive. The lack of an overt trail in writing is puzzling to me, but I still think there's something more to this.
Well perhaps will find out the real story about Mandalay Bay on the same day we find out the truth about the SCOTUS leak.
"Today there are two articles .... The first article points to the second ... Victoria Taft at PJMedia wrote the other article ..."
I do not see a link to the first article.
I'll fix it.
Plausible, as the only terrorist plots the FBI seems to discover or solve these days are those that they create.
I've seen a few posts on socials questioning the narrative about this incident; about the hotel windows - re-enforced glass that can't open, something about the bullet casings, something else about the officers who went up to the room. I've no clue but there is something phooey about blaming it on ISIS affiliation after 5 years.
My recollection is that that angle was raised very early on. This is not some recent idea.
I thought he was into Bernie.
Ancient history, but...
I also believe we should take a second look at the anthrax attacks of 2001. Bob Mueller of the FBI took all of a morning to decide it couldn't possible be Al Qaeda/Sadaam Hussein. He then spent years investigating an innocent man (Steve Hatfill) and finally fingered as the culprit an unstable man who committed suicide.
But the Antifa angle is also rejected--no motivation. And he did, apparently, have jihadi linked contacts. I have an open mind on this one--except that I do think there was some motive. The lack of an overt trail in writing is puzzling to me, but I still think there's something more to this.
I would expect a narcissist to leave behind one last flip of the bird to the world--in writing.