Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Wauck's avatar

NBC News reports that 'Dozens of additional U.S. fighter jets have been deployed across the Middle East in order to assist Israel in its expected retaliatory attack against Iran'

Expand full comment
ebear's avatar

Some points to consider.

- Iran has twice demonstrated that they can penetrate Israeli air defences.

- Iran is now defended by the world's best air defence system, the S400, manned by Russian operators. Probably why it took them so long to respond - they were waiting until the system was fully operational.

- To mount an effective attack you first have to target air defence systems. However, Russia has stated that an attack on those systems will be viewed as an attack on Russia itself.

- Since the port expansion in Tartus Syria which began in 2017, Russia can now host up to 16 capital ships, including nuclear submarines. Flight time to Israel is less than five minutes for anything launched from that location.

- For the first time, Russia has intercepted Israeli missiles aimed at Syria.

- Netanyahu recently tried to call Putin. Putin refused to take the call.

- Israel's oil supplies, now that the Red Sea is closed, come mainly via pipeline from Azerbaijan through Turkey.

- Azerbaijan has made a formal application to join BRICS.

- Turkey has indicated an interest to join BRICS which will be on the agenda at the upcoming conference in Kazan, beginning Oct 22nd.

Anything that interferes with the upcoming conference, such as an attack on a founding member state (Iran) will be viewed very negatively by Russia and other participants. Turkey is under increasing domestic pressure to shut down that pipeline. If Iran is attacked, Azerbaijan might cut off the oil before Turkey can shut down the pipeline, leading to a serious loss of face for Erdogan.

Israel's attack on Lebanon is not going well in terms of casualties and losses of equipment. Key figures in their military warned against an invasion but they were overruled. The terrain is difficult and the advantage is with the defender who has had ample time to prepare. How long can these loses be sustained?

Israeli citizens are leaving the country in numbers now. Some to avoid military service, others whose commitment to radical Zionism is fading, if it ever existed. Like rational people everywhere, their personal and family safety comes first.

Hezbollah, by contrast, has a virtually unlimited supply of fighters drawn from across the entire Muslim world. In terms of numbers, Israel will soon find itself in the same situation as Ukraine, which now lacks the trained personnel to conduct an effective military campaign.

It looks like Israel has painted itself into a corner. The economy is in disarray, people are leaving and there's no chance of a military victory. The best outcome would be the removal of the current government by their military followed by negotiations to establish peace, but how likely is that? Their last resort, a decision to use nuclear weapons would likely be stopped by their own military as a matter of self preservation, but if not, the response to that would likely be an attack by Russia to remove Israel's capacity to threaten anyone ever again, which is effectively the end of the State of Israel, at least in its current form. As a matter of self-preservation, I would expect the USA to sit that one out.

Also worth mentioning is that China gets a significant amount of its oil from Iran, and anything that interferes with that, such as an attack on Iranian facilities or the closure of the straits of Hormuz will bring them into the conflict.

Thus you have Russia, China and most of the Muslim world (if not their leadership) arrayed against a NATO alliance already feeling the strain of the war in Ukraine, and the USA, who given their open borders of the last few years will likely face internal as well as external attack should they enter the fray. Not a winning hand in my opinion.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts