Note that Fritsch is co-founder of FGPS. Baumgartner is, as I have opined, the former FBI CHS that McCabe drops like a hot potato around this time (IG report footnote #461.) And Steele was sharing the same Fusion info with the FBI, and concurrently with with Bruce Ohr, who also fed it to the FBI.
This could explain why McCabe told Baumgartner's former handler at the FBI to have no further contact with him -- he was feeding info to the FBI and concurrently feeding it to FUSION GPS, who were working for Hillary, via Perkins Coie, which Steele was feeding to the FBI. The conflict of interest is palpable, and would have undermined the the CH investigation if discovered. Apparently, McCabe didn't want to take the chance. Instead of questioning what Steele was feeding the FBI, McCabe made the evidence it was politically motivated evaporate by cutting off contact with Baumgartner.
have already appeared, @SergeiMillian has lurked, <b>& @IgorDanch will be there soon. He just has scheduling issues at the moment.<b>
12:10 PM · Feb 19, 2022 <<<
This a reference to the the recently instigated live audio meet-ups of Russia-Gate researchers on the web (e.g., Shipwreckedcrew, Fool Nelson, Stephen McIntyre, RyanM, etc.,) which are open to anyone who wants to listen or participate. As noted in the tweet, previous audio chat meetings have featured various people like Felix Sater, Michael Caputo, and Svetlana Lokova.
Most recent ones had over 3000 people listening live.
But the intriguing detail in this tweet is the suggestion that Iggy Danchenko has indictated he'd like to participate, when his schedule permits.
What lawyer would let his client do that, especially if he's likely to get peppered with questions from curious amateur Russia-Gate researchers?
My guess is an attorney would ONLY do that if his client had a plea deal/immunity agreement with Durham.
That's what makes this tweet newsworthy, IMHO. It's not proof, but is suggestive of a plea deal, if it is for real.
UPDATE:
>> https://twitter.com/codyave/status/1497965085737635848 <<
Note that Fritsch is co-founder of FGPS. Baumgartner is, as I have opined, the former FBI CHS that McCabe drops like a hot potato around this time (IG report footnote #461.) And Steele was sharing the same Fusion info with the FBI, and concurrently with with Bruce Ohr, who also fed it to the FBI.
This could explain why McCabe told Baumgartner's former handler at the FBI to have no further contact with him -- he was feeding info to the FBI and concurrently feeding it to FUSION GPS, who were working for Hillary, via Perkins Coie, which Steele was feeding to the FBI. The conflict of interest is palpable, and would have undermined the the CH investigation if discovered. Apparently, McCabe didn't want to take the chance. Instead of questioning what Steele was feeding the FBI, McCabe made the evidence it was politically motivated evaporate by cutting off contact with Baumgartner.
Possibly related:
If this is real, it's very, very intriguing:
>> https://twitter.com/MonsieursGhost/status/1495083337706213377 <<
>>> MonsieursGhost
Well @MichaelRCaputo
, @felixsater , & @RealSLokhova
have already appeared, @SergeiMillian has lurked, <b>& @IgorDanch will be there soon. He just has scheduling issues at the moment.<b>
12:10 PM · Feb 19, 2022 <<<
This a reference to the the recently instigated live audio meet-ups of Russia-Gate researchers on the web (e.g., Shipwreckedcrew, Fool Nelson, Stephen McIntyre, RyanM, etc.,) which are open to anyone who wants to listen or participate. As noted in the tweet, previous audio chat meetings have featured various people like Felix Sater, Michael Caputo, and Svetlana Lokova.
Most recent ones had over 3000 people listening live.
But the intriguing detail in this tweet is the suggestion that Iggy Danchenko has indictated he'd like to participate, when his schedule permits.
What lawyer would let his client do that, especially if he's likely to get peppered with questions from curious amateur Russia-Gate researchers?
My guess is an attorney would ONLY do that if his client had a plea deal/immunity agreement with Durham.
That's what makes this tweet newsworthy, IMHO. It's not proof, but is suggestive of a plea deal, if it is for real.
First they went after organized crime, their lawyers were too good. and Rico was born in 1970.
Then came for the drug traffickers money, but I was not a drug trafficker so I did not care starting around late 70’s.
And then then the civil assets seizure law was changed to reward police with drug profits.
Then 9-11 and we got the patriot act.
And PayPal banned people they did not like, but it was ok because they are a private business.
And then the irs went after the tea party, but nobody was punished, Lois Lerner got her pension, and so tea party types got an apology.
And then Jan 6th happened and people have been in jail over a year with no charges.
And banks had to report any daily cash deposits over $10k, or anything suspicious.
And any vendor over $600 gets a w-2
And the definition of independent contractor gets stricter.
And now they want any Venmo etc over $600 a year to be reported.
And the they went after Trucker supporters threatening to freeze their bank accounts.
I’m feeling a bit paranoid…