This morning I tried to present a relatively hopeful perspective on the Middle East, based on signs that at least some in the Imperial City on the Potomac are beginning to realize that the Israel Lobby led Zhou regime is playing with geopolitical fire that could rage out of control.
Obama's 2009-2010 "Stuxnet" cyber attack on Iran's nuclear labs was public knowledge and w. expectation that US' own infrastructure would be attacked in return. June 1, 2012, NY Times, David Stanger...."From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons....Mr. Obama has repeatedly told his aides that there are risks to using--and particularly to overusing--the weapon. In fact, no country’s infrastructure is more dependent on computer systems, and thus more vulnerable to attack, than that of the United States. It is only a matter of time, most experts believe, before it becomes the target of the same kind of weapon that the Americans have used, secretly, against Iran."..."Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran," 6/1/2012, NY Times
Maybe I'm the last to know, but I looked up "Brian Berletic" and it turns out I've read and enjoyed his articles before under the pen name "Tony Cartalucci."
CIA interference with the Baluchis reminds me of a JV squad suggestion.
Iran doesn’t need to guarantee US anything in terms of a response to Israel. They know we won’t abandon Israel.
I envision a tit for tat Iranian response versus a direct attack on Israel. Like targeting the Israeli embassy in Baku for example. That should send a double message.
UK monarchy was desperate for US to enter WWII in Europe. US elites, desperate to be "international," welcomed an emotional Churchill who felt that the two countries were so close that they effectively had "shared' citizenship for war purposes. (Churchill effectively stated this when he appeared with Truman after Truman dropped 2 atom bombs). When Neville Chamberlain resigned in 1940, King George VI appointed Winston Churchill Prime Minister. So when Churchill visited FDR and US White House in Dec. 1941 and remained a guest there for several weeks, it was as representative of King George VI. It was a good match. UK was desperate to force US taxpayers into another European war. US elites were desperate to be seen as "international." Partnering with the English-speaking UK monarchy filled the bill.
The Talmudic zionists; the Round Table, mystery cult British; the global empire Americans; the S.M.O.M. Jesuits; the German Illuminati. They are all trying to manipulate and co-utilise each other but the past masters are the ones that have been playing this game the longest. I'm not convinced there's much difference between them anyway, just as the York Rite/Scotch Rite/Oddfellows et al. are multiple heads of the same monster.
UK's longtime fear is that the world will see it as irrelevant, thus the basis of its longtime anti-Russia stance. UK fears if Russia is seen as a normal country, and US deals with it as such, UK will be irrelevant. UK is fine w. Russia as drunken idiots, which is why the Queen even visited Yeltsin in 1990s when US elites were robbing newly independent Russia blind. UK monarchy controls foreign policy. US elites love monarchies, are eager to accommodate them, it makes them feel special.
Sounds like Berletic suffers from the basic misunderstanding that all evils must be laid at America's feet.
It's enough to recognize that the 2009 paper represents American policy, or at least the aspirations of powerful interests in America. The paper is publicly available, so alongside our own history of provocative behavior, a country like Israel with similar goals can lead us by the nose.
Not gonna happen, but the Romanians are cruising for a major bruising in the future. Russians have not forgotten that Romania invaded the USSR along with the Germans--and got annihilated at Stalingrad. The Hungarians did, too, but have had the good sense to make nice with Russia since then.
I sometimes wonder if this is going to end one day with Russians continuing down the coast and going all the way to Constantinople. Now that would be historic.
i think the difference is that Romania is totally controlled by the hegemon and Hungaria is one of the rare countries still protecting their interest first. i don't thinl for a second, there is any Hungarian-Russian romance at play, just pure self interest. but which is not allowed to be performed to most so called independent countries.
More information about the US. role in Chechnya or the Caucasus generally would be helpful
More information about the US. role in Chechnya or the Caucasus generally would be helpful
Sorry
Obama's 2009-2010 "Stuxnet" cyber attack on Iran's nuclear labs was public knowledge and w. expectation that US' own infrastructure would be attacked in return. June 1, 2012, NY Times, David Stanger...."From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons....Mr. Obama has repeatedly told his aides that there are risks to using--and particularly to overusing--the weapon. In fact, no country’s infrastructure is more dependent on computer systems, and thus more vulnerable to attack, than that of the United States. It is only a matter of time, most experts believe, before it becomes the target of the same kind of weapon that the Americans have used, secretly, against Iran."..."Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran," 6/1/2012, NY Times
Maybe I'm the last to know, but I looked up "Brian Berletic" and it turns out I've read and enjoyed his articles before under the pen name "Tony Cartalucci."
CIA interference with the Baluchis reminds me of a JV squad suggestion.
Iran doesn’t need to guarantee US anything in terms of a response to Israel. They know we won’t abandon Israel.
I envision a tit for tat Iranian response versus a direct attack on Israel. Like targeting the Israeli embassy in Baku for example. That should send a double message.
British leadership led a bunch of countries by the nose into WWI (see, for example, https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/10/14/a-crime-against-humanity-the-great-reset-of-1914-1918/). The very same people were working to set up the Zionist state in Palestine, as Mark explained months ago.
British leadership led a different bunch of countries by the nose into WWII (see, for example, https://thenakedhedgie.com/2021/12/17/appeasement-the-shocking-truth-about-the-1938-munich-agreement-part-1-of-3/).
You can make a case that Britain's target in both wars was Russia. And today?
Our friend Tom recently said words to the effect that the Brits won't stop now, until they get the US to nuke Russia.
And Netanyahu the Zionist/Neocon? Maybe he is trying to get the US to nuke Iran?
There's a red, white, and blue common thread here; but not America's red, white, and blue.
UK monarchy was desperate for US to enter WWII in Europe. US elites, desperate to be "international," welcomed an emotional Churchill who felt that the two countries were so close that they effectively had "shared' citizenship for war purposes. (Churchill effectively stated this when he appeared with Truman after Truman dropped 2 atom bombs). When Neville Chamberlain resigned in 1940, King George VI appointed Winston Churchill Prime Minister. So when Churchill visited FDR and US White House in Dec. 1941 and remained a guest there for several weeks, it was as representative of King George VI. It was a good match. UK was desperate to force US taxpayers into another European war. US elites were desperate to be seen as "international." Partnering with the English-speaking UK monarchy filled the bill.
The Talmudic zionists; the Round Table, mystery cult British; the global empire Americans; the S.M.O.M. Jesuits; the German Illuminati. They are all trying to manipulate and co-utilise each other but the past masters are the ones that have been playing this game the longest. I'm not convinced there's much difference between them anyway, just as the York Rite/Scotch Rite/Oddfellows et al. are multiple heads of the same monster.
UK's longtime fear is that the world will see it as irrelevant, thus the basis of its longtime anti-Russia stance. UK fears if Russia is seen as a normal country, and US deals with it as such, UK will be irrelevant. UK is fine w. Russia as drunken idiots, which is why the Queen even visited Yeltsin in 1990s when US elites were robbing newly independent Russia blind. UK monarchy controls foreign policy. US elites love monarchies, are eager to accommodate them, it makes them feel special.
Sounds like Berletic suffers from the basic misunderstanding that all evils must be laid at America's feet.
It's enough to recognize that the 2009 paper represents American policy, or at least the aspirations of powerful interests in America. The paper is publicly available, so alongside our own history of provocative behavior, a country like Israel with similar goals can lead us by the nose.
Exactly. The "Project for a New American Century" was a plan to eliminate all of Israel's opponents until you finally get to Iran.
What’s the Russian policy towards moldova joining the Eu and/ or NATO?
Take Odessa asap.
Probably unfavorable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldova#Russia
Stated already unfavorable.
Just came across this. Don’t know what to make of it exactly.
https://asiatimes.com/2024/04/us-troops-in-moldova-in-emerging-plan-b-for-ukraine/
Not gonna happen, but the Romanians are cruising for a major bruising in the future. Russians have not forgotten that Romania invaded the USSR along with the Germans--and got annihilated at Stalingrad. The Hungarians did, too, but have had the good sense to make nice with Russia since then.
I sometimes wonder if this is going to end one day with Russians continuing down the coast and going all the way to Constantinople. Now that would be historic.
…yes, remarkably, even as all Hungarians remember the events of November 4, 1956 when Soviet tanks rolled in and crushed the October 23 revolution…
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/soviets-put-brutal-end-to-hungarian-revolution
i think the difference is that Romania is totally controlled by the hegemon and Hungaria is one of the rare countries still protecting their interest first. i don't thinl for a second, there is any Hungarian-Russian romance at play, just pure self interest. but which is not allowed to be performed to most so called independent countries.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-a-wasp-turns-cockroaches-into-zombies1/
I think the relationship is more complicated than Berletic describes.