The big picture of what’s going on in the Middle East, sparked by Hamas’ October 7 raid into Israel, is beginning to emerge. To grasp this, it’s necessary to understand that the the West and Israel have differing visions of what role Israel is meant to play in the region.
Excellent analysis. In trying to draw the US into an attack on Iran, Netanyahu is well aware that Russia and China will not stand by idly while its new BRICS+ member is destroyed. Israel is trying to instigate WWIII. It's the only way Greater Israel can ever come to pass and its Old Testament destiny of destroying the Gentile nations be realized. We are in a time of great danger.
JERUSALEM, Israel — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeated his opposition Saturday night to a proposal by U.S. President Joe Biden to restore control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority (PA) once Hamas is removed from power and destroyed.
Ran across this interesting article from 2021 called "The Realignment". Authors are Michael Doran and Tony Badran. I used to read Doran's tweets until Twitter stopped allowing non-members from reading anything. I recall he is an expert in the Middle East and has some pretty in-depth knowledge of the diplomatic intrigues. The article recounts how "Obama dreamed of a new Middle Eastern order—one that relies more on partnership with Iran." Doran calls this "the realignment". This is in contrast to Trump's plan to contain Iran. The Biden administration, filled with former-Obama era officials, has resurrected the Obama plan in the Middle East.
The article is long and there is a lot of detail comparing and contrasting the two different approaches. Looking at the larger picture, the re-imposition of the Obama realignment plan also means dismantling the Trump containment plan. This means undermining the Abraham Accords, which sought closer cooperation between traditional American allies in the Middle east.
Here is a long paragraph describing the importance of the Abraham Accords:
"It is impossible to exaggerate the value to the United States of a full-blown Saudi-Israeli peace agreement or even of significant steps in that direction. The 9/11 attacks announced that a doctrine of radical intolerance had taken deeper root inside the Muslim world than we had realized—a doctrine that seeks to wall off Muslim societies from non-Muslim influences. The Emiratis, the lead players in the Abraham Accords, see peace with Israel as part of a multipronged effort to refute this intolerant view of Islam and Muslim history. Saudi Arabia is the most powerful Arab country and, thanks to its guardianship of Mecca and Medina, one of the most influential countries in the entire Muslim world. It has also long been the fortress of conservative Islamic jurisprudence and Quranic literalism. If the country toward which all Muslims pray five times a day, and to which some 2 million make annual pilgrimages, develops openly friendly relations with the Jewish state, the implications for relations between Muslims and non-Muslims everywhere would be profound."
In contrast to that positive view of the Abraham Accords, "the Biden administration has forbidden its officials from even using the term “Abraham Accords,” which, under the influence of the Realignment, it abhors. Because the accords are politically popular, even in Democratic circles, the administration will refrain from expressing its abhorrence frankly, and will look for every opportunity to claim that it looks favorably on the normalization of relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel. In reality, however, the Biden team has no intention to expand the Abraham Accords, whose very existence is a blot on the Democrats’ record. It refutes the dogma preached by the Obama administration that peace between Israel and the Arab world must begin with a Palestinian-Israeli agreement."
Based on this perspective it is not hard to believe that the Biden administration would work together with its friends the Iranians to stir up conflict between Hamas and Israel to put a stake in the heart of the Abraham Accords and any cooperation between Israel and its Arab neighbors.
We know the people in charge have terrible plans and we rightly fear the outcome, but the reality is that most of these people are not that smart and their plans are clearly going awry. The consequences of their actions are now uncertain but none of the possibilities look good, particularly given those same players are likely to continue making bad decisions. However, nothing really changes for the better until we hit rock bottom and we appear to be well on the way!
2. After enough time exchange hostages / prisoners and go back to business as usual. With Israel believing the devastation in Gaza has established deterrence.
3. Second Nakba in Gaza
4. Second Nakba in Gaza, West Bank, and South Lebanon
5. Action by Israel to destroy Herzbolla
6. Turkish peacekeepers in Gaza
7. US attacks Herzbolla
8. US attacks Iran
9. Iran sinks US carrier
10. Russia declared no fly zone over Ukraine
11. U.S. attacks Russian forces
12. Russian forces attack U.S. forces around Israel
The unknowns are:
1. how effective is Israel in dealing with the tunnels?
Author = Ruth Marks Eglash is a veteran journalist based in Jerusalem, Israel. I wouldn't expect her perspective to be anything but what she expresses. This has been a Zionist talking point for decades.
"Al-Hindi said the primary reason why even the moderate states, most of which have diplomatic ties with Israel, have not taken practical steps to help the civilian population in Gaza is due to their aversion to Hamas and its goals."
"As a result, many Arab countries are concerned that aiding the Gazans could inadvertently benefit Hamas, given that the organization has ruled in Gaza for nearly a generation," he said. "Hamas is a network affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Muslim Brotherhood opposes every Arab monarch. This poses significant internal risks to the aforementioned states."
Are you saying that the person who said this, Ahed Al-Hindi, is all wrong?
No, I'm not. In fact I've previously pointed out the connection of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood--are you saying you don't read what I write before you comment? The MB is also close to Turkey and to Qatar--where Hamas' leadership resides. But Qatar is essentially an absolute monarchy--despite its official description as a constitutional monarchy--which suggests that MB is not opposed to all monarchies. So, yeah, I'm saying your favored author Doran is either uninformed or, more likely, pushing a propaganda agenda. The reality isn't anywhere near as simple as he wants you to believe.
The "article" that I referred to is the one reference by AmericanCardigan that you responded to. The Doran article is completely different. Also, Al Hindi does not say the Muslim Brotherhood opposed all monarchies, but rather "every Arab monarch". I take this to mean the current rulers (the monarchs) not the form of government called a "monarchy"
Israel feels betrayed by Hamas, that pretended to play nice in textbook deception, "taqiyya". And the high tech wall solution proved to be ineffective.
And Israeli's are noticing Hamas is living by the phrase "from the river to the sea". Plus the horror of the atrocities that moved the Israeli Overton Window on living with the Palestinians.
And Israel is responding with the rhetoric of Nakbar 2.0 and use of Nukes.
And Iran has threatened to destroy Israel as a way to bring the Twelfth Imam, a Shia End of Times eschatology.
So both sides are using Ethnic Cleansing, or even Genocidal Rhetoric.
I'm sure Israel would love the use the U.S. as a cat's paw to deal with Iran, Hezbollah,, etc. The problem is the Democrats would lose the 2024 election probably if they did that with their control of whom counts the votes (they have a proven track record of success in this area, I pray I am wrong), and I am not sure the U.S has the capability. And what of Russian and Turkey?
Same thing with a Nakbar 2.0, the Islamic world would not allow it to happen. Turkey does have a vote. And Russia is in Syria. An Iran's missile and drone capabilities have improved tremendously, and are probably good enough to sink a US Aircraft Carrier.
My guess is once Israel has exhausted itself through loss of people and economic losses, and felt it has done enough revenge to establish deterrence by leveling Gaza, it will declare victory. The issue is how can Israel be made to feel secure that another October 6th won't happen again? There are lots of emotions involved.
Hamas' betrayal has been in the making for over a decade. Israel's patience has run out and feels every obligation to correct this as a bi-product of Oct. 7th. Israel aligns Hamas thinking "at large" with the PLO meaning Hamas now... who's next hence re-thinking "living with the Palestinians" a.k.a. Nakbar 2.0.
Nukes are a bluff IMO. Iran is a bluff IMO. Russia will stay sidelined while providing moral support and military munitions as necessary and quietly. Again, IMO.
Abrams Accords has had some "behind the scenes" positive affect IMO.
Israel's economy while taking a hit will rebound. The lobbyists' and influence of Jewish $$$$ in the US and EU won't allow Israel to fail.
US will continue to be the "cat's paw" as backup.
"The problem is the Democrats would lose the 2024 election" Possibly as you describe control of whom counts. Good thing this event happened on their watch. I'm positive Trump would have handled differently than Zhou's administration and with greater respect than shown Blinken, Nuland, amongst others. Trump wouldn't stand for the lack of respect shown by Arab countries et al.
Russia and Turkey will stay sidelined as I mentioned Russia above. Erdogan's a waffle maker and can't be trusted even by NATO. Turkey's engagement as a NATO member was to build their prestige and status. They don't contribute much to NATO beyond. again, IMO.
"Same thing with a Nakbar 2.0, the Islamic world would not allow it to happen." Not so sure about this given my previous comments and the FoxNews article today. Another example of Abraham Accords in action?
"An Iran's missile and drone capabilities have improved tremendously, and are probably good enough to sink a US Aircraft Carrier." True, however hiding off Cyprus or the further reaches of the Arabian Sea provide some protection. You'll never see a US aircraft carrier stroll through the Strait of Hormuz again.
"My guess is once Israel has exhausted itself through loss of people and economic losses, and felt it has done enough revenge to establish deterrence by leveling Gaza, it will declare victory." Israel is slicing Gaza in half (roughly) and will let Gaza stand after they finish their strategy to reduce the Northern half of most Palestinians. It will become an extension of Israel proper IMO. The remaining 60% or thereabouts of Gaza will IMO stick around to be administered in some new fashion I'd wager. This will reflect the Israeli empathetic side.
Nothing much will change until the hostages are accounted for. That's the ultimate reason for continuing hostilities. I can see their point here. Does Israel do similar by jailing Palestinian citizens for no reason. Yep. Sure. But as usual that is on the back burner for another day to solve if ever.
"The issue is how can Israel be made to feel secure that another October 6th won't happen again? There are lots of emotions involved." Yep and Israel is gonna do what Israel feels it needs to do. Not by design but by choice. Rest of the world including US are along for the ride.
For the sake of accuracy, I propose the following amendment in brackets.
“Israel has relied over the years on the political influence of pro-Israel Jewish populations in the West—again, especially in America [where they are joined by an important pro-Israel segment of Evangelicals].”
Are the American evangelicals an important factor? Not so sure. Perhaps only if they can be used by the Zionist faction inside the USG, which I do believe significant. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the USG will be forced to support Israel in a WWIII scenario. But as our esteemed authors point out, there’s no good option when both sides have pledged to wipe out the other.
So the U.S. itself senses that Israel is potentially deliberately trying to draw Hezbollah in so that big daddy America can come in and “finish off” Hezbollah/Iran once and for all.....” My old man was right, those damn Jews are gonna wind up getting us all killed. Too bad he isn’t around anymore to see it for himself.
Well then the Israelis must be really stupid because the Biden administration is all in favor of Iran and would most certainly not come to save Israel and destroy Hezbollah/Iran. Maybe a different administration would, but not this one. I don't think Israel is so dumb as to believe this gambit would work. Maybe the pro-Iran/anti-Israel members of the current Biden administration are actually trying to destroy Israel?
this is the crux of everything: Israel appears to have heavily banked on being able to use its various social control technologies—which mostly consists of its various NGOs and global ‘anti-hate groups’ like the ADL—to dictate the narrative around this genocide.
But they failed miserably.
Israel did not appear to have a good bead on the pulse of the global awakening. ...
Times have changed, things are unwinding, Israel is losing control:
‐---‐---------'
Did Greenblatt really say that? I'm wiping my eyes over here.
That's some bad punctuation by me. That is not a quote of Greenblatt. What Greenblatt said is that they totally missed the change in public sentiment, and that it's no longer R/L but instead young/old, i.e., they've lost the young people.
I fixed that just now. Yeah, his whole job is to control the narrative by intimidating people with the dread anti-semite charge, and he knows he failed.
Just watched the video of Pascal Najadi from 4 days ago Rec’d by a commenter on your last post…do you think there is any substance to Najadi’s claim that President Trump is actually in control of the US government? Would appreciate MW’s comments
Excellent analysis. In trying to draw the US into an attack on Iran, Netanyahu is well aware that Russia and China will not stand by idly while its new BRICS+ member is destroyed. Israel is trying to instigate WWIII. It's the only way Greater Israel can ever come to pass and its Old Testament destiny of destroying the Gentile nations be realized. We are in a time of great danger.
https://www.claritypress.com/product/our-country-then-and-now/
Here ya go. Serving up on a saucer for us. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/11/18/joe-biden-gaza-hamas-putin/
And here ya go again:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4197930/posts
JERUSALEM, Israel — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeated his opposition Saturday night to a proposal by U.S. President Joe Biden to restore control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority (PA) once Hamas is removed from power and destroyed.
Talking points for the 2024 campaign, but a lot can happen between then and now.
Ran across this interesting article from 2021 called "The Realignment". Authors are Michael Doran and Tony Badran. I used to read Doran's tweets until Twitter stopped allowing non-members from reading anything. I recall he is an expert in the Middle East and has some pretty in-depth knowledge of the diplomatic intrigues. The article recounts how "Obama dreamed of a new Middle Eastern order—one that relies more on partnership with Iran." Doran calls this "the realignment". This is in contrast to Trump's plan to contain Iran. The Biden administration, filled with former-Obama era officials, has resurrected the Obama plan in the Middle East.
The article is long and there is a lot of detail comparing and contrasting the two different approaches. Looking at the larger picture, the re-imposition of the Obama realignment plan also means dismantling the Trump containment plan. This means undermining the Abraham Accords, which sought closer cooperation between traditional American allies in the Middle east.
Here is a long paragraph describing the importance of the Abraham Accords:
"It is impossible to exaggerate the value to the United States of a full-blown Saudi-Israeli peace agreement or even of significant steps in that direction. The 9/11 attacks announced that a doctrine of radical intolerance had taken deeper root inside the Muslim world than we had realized—a doctrine that seeks to wall off Muslim societies from non-Muslim influences. The Emiratis, the lead players in the Abraham Accords, see peace with Israel as part of a multipronged effort to refute this intolerant view of Islam and Muslim history. Saudi Arabia is the most powerful Arab country and, thanks to its guardianship of Mecca and Medina, one of the most influential countries in the entire Muslim world. It has also long been the fortress of conservative Islamic jurisprudence and Quranic literalism. If the country toward which all Muslims pray five times a day, and to which some 2 million make annual pilgrimages, develops openly friendly relations with the Jewish state, the implications for relations between Muslims and non-Muslims everywhere would be profound."
In contrast to that positive view of the Abraham Accords, "the Biden administration has forbidden its officials from even using the term “Abraham Accords,” which, under the influence of the Realignment, it abhors. Because the accords are politically popular, even in Democratic circles, the administration will refrain from expressing its abhorrence frankly, and will look for every opportunity to claim that it looks favorably on the normalization of relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel. In reality, however, the Biden team has no intention to expand the Abraham Accords, whose very existence is a blot on the Democrats’ record. It refutes the dogma preached by the Obama administration that peace between Israel and the Arab world must begin with a Palestinian-Israeli agreement."
Based on this perspective it is not hard to believe that the Biden administration would work together with its friends the Iranians to stir up conflict between Hamas and Israel to put a stake in the heart of the Abraham Accords and any cooperation between Israel and its Arab neighbors.
We know the people in charge have terrible plans and we rightly fear the outcome, but the reality is that most of these people are not that smart and their plans are clearly going awry. The consequences of their actions are now uncertain but none of the possibilities look good, particularly given those same players are likely to continue making bad decisions. However, nothing really changes for the better until we hit rock bottom and we appear to be well on the way!
Seem like a good time to brush up o the Project for A New American Century.
Given all the above, what choice does Israel have now beyond the one laid out before us?
Possibilities:
1. Destroy Hamas and ?
A. Israeli occupation
B. Peace keeper force
C. PLO in charge
D. Leave after declaring Hamas destroyed
2. After enough time exchange hostages / prisoners and go back to business as usual. With Israel believing the devastation in Gaza has established deterrence.
3. Second Nakba in Gaza
4. Second Nakba in Gaza, West Bank, and South Lebanon
5. Action by Israel to destroy Herzbolla
6. Turkish peacekeepers in Gaza
7. US attacks Herzbolla
8. US attacks Iran
9. Iran sinks US carrier
10. Russia declared no fly zone over Ukraine
11. U.S. attacks Russian forces
12. Russian forces attack U.S. forces around Israel
The unknowns are:
1. how effective is Israel in dealing with the tunnels?
2. how many casualties have the Israelis taken?
3. How effective are the Hamas fighters?
Here’s a perspective I shared on MIH weeks ago. Israel knows this. https://www.foxnews.com/world/more-than-million-palestinians-in-gaza-are-now-displaced-why-are-arab-countries-not-opening-their-doors
Author = Ruth Marks Eglash is a veteran journalist based in Jerusalem, Israel. I wouldn't expect her perspective to be anything but what she expresses. This has been a Zionist talking point for decades.
Go figure. Arab countries don't want to go on record as being complicit in the ethnic cleansing of Arabs.
But that is not what the article states:
"Al-Hindi said the primary reason why even the moderate states, most of which have diplomatic ties with Israel, have not taken practical steps to help the civilian population in Gaza is due to their aversion to Hamas and its goals."
"As a result, many Arab countries are concerned that aiding the Gazans could inadvertently benefit Hamas, given that the organization has ruled in Gaza for nearly a generation," he said. "Hamas is a network affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Muslim Brotherhood opposes every Arab monarch. This poses significant internal risks to the aforementioned states."
Are you saying that the person who said this, Ahed Al-Hindi, is all wrong?
No, I'm not. In fact I've previously pointed out the connection of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood--are you saying you don't read what I write before you comment? The MB is also close to Turkey and to Qatar--where Hamas' leadership resides. But Qatar is essentially an absolute monarchy--despite its official description as a constitutional monarchy--which suggests that MB is not opposed to all monarchies. So, yeah, I'm saying your favored author Doran is either uninformed or, more likely, pushing a propaganda agenda. The reality isn't anywhere near as simple as he wants you to believe.
The "article" that I referred to is the one reference by AmericanCardigan that you responded to. The Doran article is completely different. Also, Al Hindi does not say the Muslim Brotherhood opposed all monarchies, but rather "every Arab monarch". I take this to mean the current rulers (the monarchs) not the form of government called a "monarchy"
There is also the tribal angle.
And neighboring countries remember what the Palestinians did in Jordan, Black September, as well as Lebanon.
And their support for Saddam Hussein.
This is also true. And understandable.
Love your lists.
1) hostages? Can’t forget them with a, b, c, d.
2). Tied to no 1.
3) seems similar to no 1.
4) seems their new intent
5 - rest) pull US into this conflict seems a strong consideration. Israel’s okay with this it appears.
Israel sees this as survival for their way of life. Lobbyists et al outside of Israel agree. There’s no going back. Katy bar the door.
I'm not sure what will happen.
Israel feels betrayed by Hamas, that pretended to play nice in textbook deception, "taqiyya". And the high tech wall solution proved to be ineffective.
And Israeli's are noticing Hamas is living by the phrase "from the river to the sea". Plus the horror of the atrocities that moved the Israeli Overton Window on living with the Palestinians.
And Israel is responding with the rhetoric of Nakbar 2.0 and use of Nukes.
And Iran has threatened to destroy Israel as a way to bring the Twelfth Imam, a Shia End of Times eschatology.
So both sides are using Ethnic Cleansing, or even Genocidal Rhetoric.
I'm sure Israel would love the use the U.S. as a cat's paw to deal with Iran, Hezbollah,, etc. The problem is the Democrats would lose the 2024 election probably if they did that with their control of whom counts the votes (they have a proven track record of success in this area, I pray I am wrong), and I am not sure the U.S has the capability. And what of Russian and Turkey?
Same thing with a Nakbar 2.0, the Islamic world would not allow it to happen. Turkey does have a vote. And Russia is in Syria. An Iran's missile and drone capabilities have improved tremendously, and are probably good enough to sink a US Aircraft Carrier.
My guess is once Israel has exhausted itself through loss of people and economic losses, and felt it has done enough revenge to establish deterrence by leveling Gaza, it will declare victory. The issue is how can Israel be made to feel secure that another October 6th won't happen again? There are lots of emotions involved.
Hamas' betrayal has been in the making for over a decade. Israel's patience has run out and feels every obligation to correct this as a bi-product of Oct. 7th. Israel aligns Hamas thinking "at large" with the PLO meaning Hamas now... who's next hence re-thinking "living with the Palestinians" a.k.a. Nakbar 2.0.
Nukes are a bluff IMO. Iran is a bluff IMO. Russia will stay sidelined while providing moral support and military munitions as necessary and quietly. Again, IMO.
Abrams Accords has had some "behind the scenes" positive affect IMO.
Israel's economy while taking a hit will rebound. The lobbyists' and influence of Jewish $$$$ in the US and EU won't allow Israel to fail.
US will continue to be the "cat's paw" as backup.
"The problem is the Democrats would lose the 2024 election" Possibly as you describe control of whom counts. Good thing this event happened on their watch. I'm positive Trump would have handled differently than Zhou's administration and with greater respect than shown Blinken, Nuland, amongst others. Trump wouldn't stand for the lack of respect shown by Arab countries et al.
Russia and Turkey will stay sidelined as I mentioned Russia above. Erdogan's a waffle maker and can't be trusted even by NATO. Turkey's engagement as a NATO member was to build their prestige and status. They don't contribute much to NATO beyond. again, IMO.
"Same thing with a Nakbar 2.0, the Islamic world would not allow it to happen." Not so sure about this given my previous comments and the FoxNews article today. Another example of Abraham Accords in action?
"An Iran's missile and drone capabilities have improved tremendously, and are probably good enough to sink a US Aircraft Carrier." True, however hiding off Cyprus or the further reaches of the Arabian Sea provide some protection. You'll never see a US aircraft carrier stroll through the Strait of Hormuz again.
"My guess is once Israel has exhausted itself through loss of people and economic losses, and felt it has done enough revenge to establish deterrence by leveling Gaza, it will declare victory." Israel is slicing Gaza in half (roughly) and will let Gaza stand after they finish their strategy to reduce the Northern half of most Palestinians. It will become an extension of Israel proper IMO. The remaining 60% or thereabouts of Gaza will IMO stick around to be administered in some new fashion I'd wager. This will reflect the Israeli empathetic side.
Nothing much will change until the hostages are accounted for. That's the ultimate reason for continuing hostilities. I can see their point here. Does Israel do similar by jailing Palestinian citizens for no reason. Yep. Sure. But as usual that is on the back burner for another day to solve if ever.
"The issue is how can Israel be made to feel secure that another October 6th won't happen again? There are lots of emotions involved." Yep and Israel is gonna do what Israel feels it needs to do. Not by design but by choice. Rest of the world including US are along for the ride.
“These are uncharted waters, and the ship of state is captained by a combination of blind hegemonists and wild eyed ideological fanatics.”
…and octogenarian dotards.
For the sake of accuracy, I propose the following amendment in brackets.
“Israel has relied over the years on the political influence of pro-Israel Jewish populations in the West—again, especially in America [where they are joined by an important pro-Israel segment of Evangelicals].”
Are the American evangelicals an important factor? Not so sure. Perhaps only if they can be used by the Zionist faction inside the USG, which I do believe significant. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the USG will be forced to support Israel in a WWIII scenario. But as our esteemed authors point out, there’s no good option when both sides have pledged to wipe out the other.
So the U.S. itself senses that Israel is potentially deliberately trying to draw Hezbollah in so that big daddy America can come in and “finish off” Hezbollah/Iran once and for all.....” My old man was right, those damn Jews are gonna wind up getting us all killed. Too bad he isn’t around anymore to see it for himself.
Well then the Israelis must be really stupid because the Biden administration is all in favor of Iran and would most certainly not come to save Israel and destroy Hezbollah/Iran. Maybe a different administration would, but not this one. I don't think Israel is so dumb as to believe this gambit would work. Maybe the pro-Iran/anti-Israel members of the current Biden administration are actually trying to destroy Israel?
$10B appeasement strategy
Yeah, shame.
this is the crux of everything: Israel appears to have heavily banked on being able to use its various social control technologies—which mostly consists of its various NGOs and global ‘anti-hate groups’ like the ADL—to dictate the narrative around this genocide.
But they failed miserably.
Israel did not appear to have a good bead on the pulse of the global awakening. ...
Times have changed, things are unwinding, Israel is losing control:
‐---‐---------'
Did Greenblatt really say that? I'm wiping my eyes over here.
He basically admitted it's a Genocide.
Please confirm.
WOW
That's some bad punctuation by me. That is not a quote of Greenblatt. What Greenblatt said is that they totally missed the change in public sentiment, and that it's no longer R/L but instead young/old, i.e., they've lost the young people.
That’s two major misses now. Intel being the other.
Thanks
I listened to the recording of him on Twitter.
Just as damming but not so explicit.
Gotta say that he must be in panic mode right now.
I fixed that just now. Yeah, his whole job is to control the narrative by intimidating people with the dread anti-semite charge, and he knows he failed.
The fact that he knows he's failed for all the World to see is what makes this so delicious.
Good times are ahead!
I assume that is Simplicius' choice of words.
Cf. my comment above.
Just watched the video of Pascal Najadi from 4 days ago Rec’d by a commenter on your last post…do you think there is any substance to Najadi’s claim that President Trump is actually in control of the US government? Would appreciate MW’s comments
I believe this is the Continuity of Government / Devolution theory that posits Trump is still the Commander-in-Chief of the military.
I've never listened to Najadi or read anything by him. No, don't think Trump is actually in control. Sounds totally goofy to me.
No, Trump is not. It’s a crazy idea.
A more truthful comment is if Trump is for it, the Biden Administration will do the opposite.
Lesson: Things can always get worse. Can't stand my neighbors, but no molten lava seaping up.
The volcano eruption will be blamed on SUVs and global warming. Follow the Science.
But think about how much less natural gas they will consume as the lava heats up their neighborhoods. Greta’s doing cartwheels.