Barely A Week Into 2022--Is It SHTF Time Already?

Yesterday we were asking whether there were more signs of Dems anxiously looking for an exit strategy from the Covid Regime. Today, it’s starting to look like SHTF time already. The trajectory—the search for an exit strategy—has been apparent for a while, but the motive force behind that search appears to be getting more urgent.

For one thing, Fauci is starting to look distinctly radioactive. This follows on the release by Project Veritas of documentary proof that Fauci has been lying all along about US funding—with his personal involvement—in Gain of Function (GOF) research in Wuhan. There are multiple stories out today about this, and Rand Paul has been raking Fauci over the coals in the Senate. Because the material is somewhat dense, and to avoid repetition, I’m going to recommend the CTH digest of the details:

Project Veritas Obtains Hidden Military Documents Showing NIH Intent to Create SARS-CoV-2, Using Gain of Function Research

To give some idea of the explosive nature of these materials, …

Now keep in mind that EcoHealth Alliance means: Peter Daszak, close collaborator with Fauci in all the shenanigans at Wuhan:

Project Veritas has obtained military documents hidden on a classified system [HERE – and HERE – and HERE] showing how EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses.

The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violated the gain of function research moratorium.  However, according to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.

Sundance goes into pretty lucid detail to explain how this all went down, so I recommend his account to readers who want the specifics—including the Zhou regime’s coverup. Then, toward the end, Sundance enters into some speculation. I want to draw attention to one particular point, because it’s one that has troubled me. First, here’s the passage—the key step occurs just days before the Trump administration will enter the White House:

♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice Oval Office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] – The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons.  … [LINK]

…

If you accept that the Pentagon would never spend to develop a biological weapon in China (Wuhan Lab) unless they already had developed that weapon on their own (North Carolina Lab), then the question about the release of that weapon starts to take shape.

That’s the key part that’s been troubling me. This is speculative, but it’s absolutely logical. Yes, I can accept that the Pentagon would not fund Chinese development of was to all intents and purposes a bioweapon unless they already had done so themselves.

If you have followed how the U.S. Intelligence Community operates, you can see a pretty clear picture emerge of a strong likelihood surrounding what took place.

The U.S. Defense Dept developed SARS-CoV-2 in North Carolina.  The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) wanted to use it.  The Pentagon restarts funding for development of SARS-CoV-2 in partnership with Wuhan, China – setting up the cover story.  The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) then uses the virus by releasing it in/around Wuhan.  Everything after that is simply part of the 4th Branch covering their tracks.  Wuhan, China becomes the patsy.

The IC release of COVID-19 would have two transparent motives for the 4th Branch:  (1) Get rid of Trump via mail-in ballots, and intelligence assistance toward the 2020 election result; and (2) Expand their influence and control operations as the most powerful force in U.S. government.

One of the central players, who likely knows the details behind who exactly executed the release, is former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been blaming the Chinese almost exclusively.  [Methinks he doth protest too much.]  Pompeo is the ultimate weapon of the deep swamp.

Former DNI John Ratcliffe is also a staunch figure pointing at Wuhan, China.  Keep in mind DNI Ratcliffe was the recipient of the 4th Branch Intelligence Community products that pointed to Wuhan, China, though Ratcliffe had no involvement.

Anyone who cares to do so can search the past blogs here. You’ll see that I’ve been consistently expressing concern about Pompeo in the Trump administration.

You can also read the Red State account:

US Military Report States COVID-19 Was Created by a US-Funded EcoHealth Alliance Program at Wuhan Institute of Virology

Moving on …

We saw yesterday that, over the weekend, Rochelle at CDC admitted that 75% of persons who died with/from Covid had “at least” four co-morbidities—meaning, four or more co-morbidities. The percentage that I’ve seen of people without any co-morbidities who died actually from Covid is … 6%. Rochelle’s admission, which she brought forward on her own, has all the earmarks of being part of that exit strategy we were talking about. For one take on what this means, Karl Denninger will tell you: Time To Take Out The Trash. KD forthrightly states that this was all a “scam.” And he’s right. A lot of other people have picked up on this, because it was never rocket science to figure this out. There are a lot of people complicit in this scam.

One group that’s obviously complicit in the gaslighting of America is Big Pharma. Alex Berenson (h/t Hemsley Hawes) has a substack today on this subject. It’s both smart and clever—a good read. He’s suggesting that Big Pharma is also looking for an exit strategy from peddling “vaccines” that don’t seem to do anything anymore—if they ever did:

If you are a vaccine company executive, it's time to slam the brakes

Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla sees the dangers ahead, as his very carefully worded interview (worthy of close review) with CNBC yesterday shows.

Again, I’ll excerpt for my own purposes. Berenson starts out by making a comparison of the “vaccine” rollout to another disastrous scam: the NINJA mortgage scam. That’s clever, but apt enough. In this case, however, there’s a difference. Within months of the “vaccine” rollout smart, experienced scientists like Michael Yeadon and Geerd Vanden Bossche were aghast—-and were saying so. They couldn’t believe the strategy that had been adopted, because it flew in the face of basic science. Berenson maintains that the idea that the first scam involved “innocent” victims is a bit of a myth, whereas this time around there really are innocent victims—tens and scores of millions of them:

Fast-forward to 2022.

This time around the myth of the truly innocent victim is not a myth.

The hundreds of millions of people who have received shots of mRNA/LNP and DNA/AAV Covid vaccines had no real idea what they were taking.

They did so on the urging of the vaccine companies and health authorities, who told them that in doing so they would protect themselves and their families and end the Covid epidemic. The statements were public. Many are less than a year old. They cannot be suppressed or memory-holed, no matter how hard anyone wants to try.

Every single one of those statements has proven wrong - so wrong that the companies, which are at much greater legal risk than the public health authorities - no longer even try to defend them.

Here’s what Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s chief executive officer, said on Monday in an interview on CNBC:

The hope is that we will achieve something that will have way, way better protection, particularly against infections because the protection against the hospitalizations and the severe disease, it is, it is reasonable right now, with the current vaccines as long as you are having let’s say the third dose.

Whoa! That’s just stunning. In case his readers didn’t catch that, Berenson lays it all out—what Bourla is really saying: His ““vaccines” are now basically worthless:

Read those words very carefully.

Protection against “severe disease” is “reasonable right now” for people who have taken a “third dose” of Pfizer’s vaccine.

Put aside the fact that even those words are at best an optimistic interpretation of current data.

Put aside the fact that Pfizer has NEVER compared a three-dose vaccine regimen to a placebo in a clinical trial.

Put aside the fact that “reasonable right now” suggests that any effect of a third dose will not last.

What the chief executive of Pfizer is telling you is THAT IF YOU RECEIVED TWO DOSES OF HIS COMPANY’S VACCINE LAST YEAR, YOUR PROTECTION IS GONE.

Even against “the hospitalizations and the severe disease.”

You need to be “having let’s say the third dose” for protection against those.

I didn’t say it.

Pfizer’s CEO did. (And I can’t wait to see Twitter’s lawyers try to explain it when they defend my fifth strike. It goes WAY further than that tweet did.)

—

Most people don’t understand yet how badly they were conned.

But they will.

Berenson goes on to discuss the factor that he believes will finally lead to people realizing how badly they were conned: Adverse events. He may well be right, but I want to draw attention to an article that may highlight an even more dramatic factor—one which the the insurance CEO pointed to: A dramatic rise in mortality under the Injection Regime.

To understand this you need to consider that there were no “vaccines” until 2021. That means, or should mean, that Covid should have carried away huge numbers of the old and comorbid people in 2020. That should have resulted in an increase in mortality in 2020, but with the introduction of super effective injections—as we were told—there should have been a big drop in mortality: 1) because the vulnerable would have already died in the previous year, leading to fewer vulnerable available to die, and 2) because the population would be highly protected—if not by the injections, then by natural immunity gained from exposure during 2020. 

OK:

German professor debunks claim that COVID vaccines help reduce deaths

‘The strong increase in mortality [in 2021] cannot be explained by mere demographic factors.’

Here’s the heart of the article:

In one of his latest tweets, published Thursday, Homburg pointed to data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany showing that the number of deaths in Germany for the year 2021 has increased by 43,000 compared to 2020.

“The illusion: [the vaccine] protects from severe illness and death,” he wrote. “The reality: an enormous increase in mortality in 2021 compared to the unprotected ‘pandemic year’ 2020.”

In the comment section of his tweet, Homburg explained that the strong increase in mortality cannot be explained by mere demographic factors such as an ageing population, as this would only account for “a few extra thousand deaths at best.”

A smart commenter quickly picked up on what was so damning about these these mortality statistics:

Here is what many people don’t get from your tweet: we are not seeing a reduction in mortality, yet we should be able to see one if you consider that COVID causes a high number of deaths of approximately 40,000 people a year, and if vaccination protects from death. A vaccination without benefit cannot become compulsory.

...

But data from various countries on COVID-19 hospitalizations point in fact to a pandemic of the fully vaccinated. This is because the protection provided by the jabs against the virus is fast waning and insufficient, and can cause a weakening of the immune system.

...

The unexplained increase of mortality in Germany last year also happens to coincide with a rising number of reported adverse events linked to vaccination against COVID-19 in Europe, including death cases.

Recall, the insurance CEO was also flabbergasted at what he saw to be inexplicable and unprecendented increases in deaths in the second half of 2021.

This is what smart scientists have been warning about. The rushed, untested rollout. The experimental technology. The narrow focus of the injection. The failure to understand the action of the Spike. Even non-scientists could see the dangers:

Berenson, as noted above, believes he sees Big Pharma scrambling for the exit. He again quotes Bourla, who’s a science PhD:

I suspect the smartest people at the companies are increasingly aware of the potential crisis of repeated dosing. Which may be why Bourla also said in the CNBC interview, “I don’t know if there is a need for a fourth booster.”

…

Instead Bourla talked up Paxlovid, his company’s new $530 per treatment antiviral. …

So what’s Bourla’s game? Doesn’t he want to sell as many vaccines as he can?

Maybe not. …

More important for Bourla, the real risk to Pfizer - and to him - comes from side effects. ...

... People will be FURIOUS if they think they been conned into taking vaccines that didn’t work and potentially hurt them, or their parents, or their kids.

…

So the prudent move for Albert Bourla, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, PhD., is to begin to tamp expectations for vaccines, slow-walk more boosters, and hope that Omicron does his job for him. His biggest problem is probably that the public health authorities are a lot stupider than he is and continue to push boosters.

I’d love to know what Pfizer is telling them privately. I’m gonna guess it’s not in email, though.

There’s an awful lot of bad stuff coming together just now, at a time when nearly 70% of people are desperately worried about the economy. And #BareShelvesBiden is trending.