4 Comments
User's avatar
johnycomelately's avatar

Just a snapshot of how Bergoglio stacked the conclave.

Mykola Bychok, bishop of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Australia (with about 10 thousand parishioners) was made a Cardinal.

While Australia’s 5 million Catholics remain without a cardinal (despite historically having one) because the Sydney and Melbourne crew are conservatives.

Too boot Australia’s last cardinal passed away in Rome and was sent home in a casket naked, with a broken nose and his clothes stuffed in the casket.

Expand full comment
Doug Hoover's avatar

America cut off their connection to SWIFT,

freezing their ability to transfer or accept money.

America picked an American Pope.

Expand full comment
AmericanCardigan's avatar

Haven't seen evidence yet that the Vatican is reconnected to SWIFT.

Expand full comment
Mark Wauck's avatar

https://www.theswiftcodes.com/vatican-city/

What Doug Hoover describes occurred in 2013. The "American Pope" DH refers to was Bergoglio:

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/2013-the-globalist-coup-that-took

"When a bank or territory is excluded from the System, as was the case with the Vatican in the days preceding Benedict XVI's resignation in February 2013, all transactions were blocked. Without waiting for the election of Pope Bergoglio, the Swift system was unlocked upon the announcement of Benedict XVI's resignation."

In point of fact, Vatican City was reconnected to Swift before Bergoglio was elected. That B16 was removed seems beyond doubt. The perps have never taken credit. Presumably America at least acquiesced in the coup, but it's conceivable that it was instigated by non-American forces and coordinated with America:

The great globalist powers are in a hurry and Ratzinger was a clear obstacle, a slowdown on their lightning-fast trajectory.”

...

And immediately after his passing, SWIFT unblocks Vatican transactions, reopens ATMs, and brings the IOR back to the honor of the world.

They didn’t wait for Bergoglio to be elected; the expulsion of the “white terrorist” was enough for him.

In the good and unattainable salons between Wall Street and Washington and London, they already knew that the conclave would give the throne to a modernist, to someone they could trust.

How come? Had the SWIFT sanction been coordinated with the “conspirators” in purple who, led by Carlo Maria Martini (a cardinal who asked for euthanasia for himself, it should be remembered…) had marked Bergoglio as their candidate for years already?

Was there an agreement between the conspirators with a strong external power, to which they are close in ideology?

But it seems to understand that Ratzinger’s resignation is – he was forced to step down from the throne of Peter under construction.

Expand full comment