I’ve avoided purely military updates in the absence of dramatic events. Russia’s way has not been our way—which is not unexpected, given that Russia’s war in Ukraine has far different goals than our Third World wars have had. However, Moon of Alabama
I hope those weapons we're sending meet John Kerry's climate approved standards. Let's get them some exercise and see what those weapons can do. Most interested in the blue powdery ones.
This is from the New Yorker. Since I don't subscribe, I can't say if you'll be able to read it. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/is-the-russian-military-a-paper-tiger The gist is that Russia is weak and losing and that if Russia ever got into a military wrangle with a single NATO power, said NATO power would annihilate them.
The clashing narratives are actually spreading farther apart. Again, what astonishes me is that in narrative A, the uniparty narrative, Russia has lost tens of thousands of troops and is more or less on the brink. Russia will be soundly defeated in the Ukraine. Narrative B is our narrative.
All I can say is we are going to find out which is the correct narrative. My intuitive sense is that any NYkr article that posits that the girl generals in NATO would defeat the Russians beggars the imagination. NATO is the real paper tiger.
Also, I've read but can't verify that the U.S. was involved in providing info that made it possible for the Ukrainians to sink the Russian ship. America is run by fools and knaves, who are playing with real fire. I think they see nuclear war as a kind of video game.
I hope those weapons we're sending meet John Kerry's climate approved standards. Let's get them some exercise and see what those weapons can do. Most interested in the blue powdery ones.
more on the food supply being destroyed - map showing the locations
https://iceagefarmer.com/fire/
This is from the New Yorker. Since I don't subscribe, I can't say if you'll be able to read it. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/is-the-russian-military-a-paper-tiger The gist is that Russia is weak and losing and that if Russia ever got into a military wrangle with a single NATO power, said NATO power would annihilate them.
The clashing narratives are actually spreading farther apart. Again, what astonishes me is that in narrative A, the uniparty narrative, Russia has lost tens of thousands of troops and is more or less on the brink. Russia will be soundly defeated in the Ukraine. Narrative B is our narrative.
All I can say is we are going to find out which is the correct narrative. My intuitive sense is that any NYkr article that posits that the girl generals in NATO would defeat the Russians beggars the imagination. NATO is the real paper tiger.
Also, I've read but can't verify that the U.S. was involved in providing info that made it possible for the Ukrainians to sink the Russian ship. America is run by fools and knaves, who are playing with real fire. I think they see nuclear war as a kind of video game.
What is the most important of all of these that will affect the lives of most people for the long term? The COVID pass, I think.