Glenn Diesen makes it short and sweet. Follow the link for his video discussion:
Has Biden authorised long-range missiles to save Ukraine or sabotage Trump?
Professor Glenn Diesen on The Spectator
My position in this debate was that these missiles are not intended to turn the tide of the war, rather the purpose seems to be to sabotage Trump’s efforts to end the war. Obama similarly escalated tensions with Russia with sanctions, closure of a Russian consulate and expulsion of Russian diplomats before he left office to make it more difficult for Trump to “get along with Russia”. Biden’s actions are much more dangerous as this marks the start of a NATO-Russia War.
Arguing that Ukraine has the right to defend itself is very manipulative, as the main issue is that NATO crosses the line from proxy war to direct war. These are American long-range missiles, their use is entirely dependent on US intelligence and targeting, and American soldiers will operate these weapons and they will be guided by American satellites. This is an American attack on Russia, the world’s largest nuclear power. Putin has warned it will be interpreted as the start of a NATO-Russia War, and he has committed Russia to retaliate.
I’ll repeat what I said earlier. It’s more precisely about trying to destroy Trump 2.0 before it gets started. War abroad is secondary at this juncture to war at home.
The psychopaths are in charge, trying to paint everyone, including themselves and their opponents, into a corner. Does Trump fall for it? He should know better. On day one he simply repudiates everything the US has done so far in Ukraine and meets with Putin in person. Let everyone raise hell. Who cares - just the Ukrainian soldiers who want the war to end before they are killed or maimed.
Trying to destroy Trump? A laugher. It vastly strengthens Trump's hand by showing the world the outgoing Dems are psycho.