The number of people who read this minus the number of people who will still take the gene therapy shots equals the number of people who still have their sanity.
Alex Berenson--I think--reported today that only 35% of those eligible have gotten boosted. People were fooled the first time around into thinking they were getting "vaccinated". Now lots of people know better and are becoming skeptical.
Let's welcome the other 65% into the swelling ranks of the "unvaccinated" as the goalposts inevitably shift and the boosters become mandatory. That's the major reason why I don't like "pureblood" posturing. Purity talk just adds to the division when we need to be finding common cause.
OF, I'm starting that article, which looks very interesting. Here's the problem I have with death or extremely serious conditions like strokes as AEs in VAERS. My suspicion is that, as anecdotal reporting (which seems strong) indicates, even many deaths are not reported as AEs but written off as undiscovered conditions or "bad genes" or such like. That's why the numbers that we have, underreported though they may be, are so disturbing.
I think this realization is what has led Malone to come around to saying that there is NO demographic for whom the injections make sense. He had been sticking to the "jab the at risk". Turns out the injections cause even greater risk for them.
Here's an eye-opener. How many injectees gave informed consent to this type of experimentation? They thought they were getting vaccinated!
"Since all the available products in the US are still under EUA, **they can legally contain different formulations and doses in their products, including placebos.** Please don’t take my word for it, check out [URL] and type in NCT04368728 to see that we are all lab rats in this huge population level experiment."
The number of people who read this minus the number of people who will still take the gene therapy shots equals the number of people who still have their sanity.
I was told there would be no arithmetic.
Haha! Well, thank you for participating. Sorry I have no trophy!
Alex Berenson--I think--reported today that only 35% of those eligible have gotten boosted. People were fooled the first time around into thinking they were getting "vaccinated". Now lots of people know better and are becoming skeptical.
Let's welcome the other 65% into the swelling ranks of the "unvaccinated" as the goalposts inevitably shift and the boosters become mandatory. That's the major reason why I don't like "pureblood" posturing. Purity talk just adds to the division when we need to be finding common cause.
Good point but maybe different messages needed at different times, pureblood counters pariah, also helpful I think
OF, I'm starting that article, which looks very interesting. Here's the problem I have with death or extremely serious conditions like strokes as AEs in VAERS. My suspicion is that, as anecdotal reporting (which seems strong) indicates, even many deaths are not reported as AEs but written off as undiscovered conditions or "bad genes" or such like. That's why the numbers that we have, underreported though they may be, are so disturbing.
I think this realization is what has led Malone to come around to saying that there is NO demographic for whom the injections make sense. He had been sticking to the "jab the at risk". Turns out the injections cause even greater risk for them.
Here's an eye-opener. How many injectees gave informed consent to this type of experimentation? They thought they were getting vaccinated!
"Since all the available products in the US are still under EUA, **they can legally contain different formulations and doses in their products, including placebos.** Please don’t take my word for it, check out [URL] and type in NCT04368728 to see that we are all lab rats in this huge population level experiment."
We will all get off sooner or later, I ain't in a hurry, therefore no gene therapy jabs are going into my 59 year old body.
Careful what you wish for.