Simplicius the Thinker makes a common sensical observation regarding the initial interrogations of the terrorist perps in Russia. If you’ve watched the videos, you’ll know that these weren’t true interrogations—just rough and ready basic questions, probably to establish the base line cover story before the real interrogations begin:
The terrorists are just reciting their rehearsed speech about 'anonymous' Telegram 'shadowy figures' hiring them.
But in reality, they were caught heading to the Ukrainian border which already proves they had contacts there waiting for them, which virtually confirms it was an SBU job.
Remember when Vladlen Tatarsky was killed, the killer Daria Trepova also played stupid and claimed she knew nothing and was given a statue of whose contents she wasn't aware.
But in the trial it was discovered she lied about everything and was instrumental in the assassination plot.
Same thing will likely be revealed here.
In the previous post I referenced Victoria Nuland’s recent claim that “Putin will face some nasty surprises on the battlefield”—that’s the actual direct quote. But she also refers in that exact context to “asymmetric warfare.” In the context of her remarks she’s clearly not referring to bombs and missiles and artillery shells. “Asymmetric” is a very specific word, a word intended to distinguish that type of warfare from “symmetric” warfare: shell for shell, bomb for bomb, missile for missile. The next tweet contains the 24 second clip of Nuland making that statement, in which she touts Ukraine’s “asymmetric warefare” capabilities. Yeah, I thought we just gave the Ukro-Nazis money and munitions? How does Nuland know about the Ukrainian “asymmetric warfare that has been most effective"?
DD Geopolitics @DD_Geopolitics
A month ago (to the day!) at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Victoria "F the EU" Nuland promised the aid to Ukraine would allow them to "accelerate the asymmetric warfare that has been most effective" and that Putin is "sure to face some nasty surprises."
Nuland left her post as the Deputy Secretary of State 10 days prior to this video. Moscow civilians were killed today in an act of terrorism (asymmetrical warfare).
9:55 PM · Mar 22, 2024
Another tweeter makes this shrewd observation—recalling that Biden and Nuland both bragged about the Nordstream sabotage before the fact. Now, in retrospect, was the publicized Sullivan trip to Kiev to tell them, no more attacks on Russia, intended to distance the directors and trainers?
It wasn’t too long ago Victoria Nuland told us about plans for asymmetrical warfare[Terrorism] and “nasty surprises for Putin”.
Mary Kostakidis @MaryKostakidis
They can’t help bragging about it before they do it. Like the pipeline. Russia has exercised enormous self control. I wonder how much more provocation it can take before this explodes into ww3
Well organized:
Тоби айоделе -Tboy @TobiAyodele
 The owner of the hotel where the terrorists who carried out the terrorist attack in Crocus lived described her guests to law enforcement officers
Guests from Tajikistan checked in at the beginning of March, behaved well, did not create rows, and always greeted us and smiled. All communication with the hotel administration went through one person, a 19-year-old hairdresser from Ivanovo, Muhammadsobir Fayzov - he spoke Russian better than anyone else. When checking in, the terrorists presented passports of Tajikistan (c) @ENews112
6:50 AM · Mar 23, 2024
Jacque Line @MissJacque_line
 RT Editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan on her Telegram channel:
"Trainers collectively express condolences to the victims of their dogs."
It’s interesting that several weeks ago the Azerbaijanian president made a vow to repeal colonialism, ostensibly against the French but the real target was probably Russia.
The Gehlen CIA network was extensive in the Soviet Union, looks like it is going to be activated and this is just the beginning.
To me the most logical conclusion is that this is an attempt by Ukraine (supported financially and operationally by the usual suspects who specialize in black ops, terror, regime change, subterfuge, etc) to *provoke* (there it is, the *p* word again) Russia into a response which can then be used to justify a substantial escalation by the West, including NATO troops, attacks against Russia, etc., in the name of *democracy* (there it is, the *d* word again).
I’ll just say that I think Putin is too smart for them. He knows the let’s just call it ‘CIA’ playbook and he isn’t going to be tricked into a response that exposes Russia to WWIII. While the terror attack
was horrific, he is winning the war in Ukraine and he just needs to stay the course to achieve his objective.
But that doesn’t mean Ukraine will not pay plenty for the attack. I just don’t think the West can sucker Putin into overplaying his hand.
And, of course, as I’ve said here before, accidents can and will happen and Biden and friends are playing a very dangerous game. Of which a huge majority of the American public is totally ignorant.
I refer to the other N word.