WSJ Deals Hit To Covid Regime
Every day seems to bring a further unraveling of the Covid Regime. Earlier today the Danish government announced that it’s planning on lifting all Covid Regime restrictions by February 1st. The Danes join an increasing number of nations to take similar actions. There are crazies out there still, but the trend is clear.
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has published an article that confirms what we’ve all known—the incidence of myocarditis and pericardities is drastically higher among those who have been injected with the ‘vaccines’, and the rate is especially elevated among young men of high school and college age.
Now the WSJ, which remains a prestige MSM outlet, has published an article by Dr. Marty Makary that makes a stunning suggestion—stunning for such a mainstream media outlet:
The High Cost of Disparaging Natural Immunity to Covid
Wall Street Journal ^ | 1/26/2022 | Dr. MakaryPublic-health officials ruined many lives by insisting that workers with natural immunity to Covid-19 be fired if they weren’t fully vaccinated. But after two years of accruing data, the superiority of natural immunity over vaccinated immunity is clear. By firing staff with natural immunity, employers got rid of those least likely to infect others. It’s time to reinstate those employees with an apology.
For most of last year, many of us called for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its data on reinfection rates, but the agency refused. Finally last week, the CDC released data from New York and California, which demonstrated natural immunity was 2.8 times as effective in preventing hospitalization and 3.3 to 4.7 times as effective in preventing Covid infection compared with vaccination.
Yet the CDC spun the report to fit its narrative, bannering the conclusion “vaccination remains the safest strategy.” It based this conclusion on the finding that hybrid immunity—the combination of prior infection and vaccination—was associated with a slightly lower risk of testing positive for Covid. But those with hybrid immunity had a similar low rate of hospitalization (3 per 10,000) to those with natural immunity alone. In other words, vaccinating people who had already had Covid didn’t significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization.
…
The pressure on the Covid Regime is inexorably increasing. Of course the human and economic damage is becoming untenable for the Zhou regime, but the science is also coming out and the deceptions are being exposed. Something has to give, and probably sooner rather than later.
Does anyone else find "It’s time to reinstate those employees with an apology" a laughably gross understatement? I can understand Makary treading carefully upon publication in such an "august" journal - or perhaps that phrasing was the result of editorial construction? Anyway, If I lost my job because of not taking the vaccine after having had COVID, I would be after way more than an apology. After all, employers (as of now) have no immunity around their coercion and harmful actions pertaining to the vaccines and medical treatment.
WSJ hires from the same pool of reporters as the NYT, Washington Post, etc.
>WSJ, which remains a prestige MSM outlet,
The stories in the WSJ are slightly less political than the other large mainstream papers, but not by much. The Editorial Page is a bit more conservative. I have been amazed at how they have ignored the Jan 6 Prisoners and Election Fraud Issues, that tells me a lot about their political leanings..