This update will be working off Danny Davis’ Deep Dive Intel Briefing from this morning. However, here’s my summary of how things are starting to look.
It appears that Zhou’s Jewish (Blinken) and Israeli (Hochstein) and complicit (Sullivan) controllers have talked Zhou into the following narrative. If the US helps Israel deliver a heavy strike against Iran, then Israel will be able to force Hezbollah to submit and drop out of the resistance to Israel’s genocide in Gaza. What happens in Gaza will be left up in the air—the ‘victory’ over Iran and Hezbollah will be trumpeted as ‘peace’ for a time, but Israel’s genocide will continue. The “reasoning” appears to be that a heavy enough strike against Iran will cripple Hezbollah for the time being because they will lack sufficient support from Iran. Key to this scenario is that Zhou has been talked out of any diplomatic solution with Iran—the Neocon Triumvirate (above) has convinced him that the war on Russia through the Iranian front is essential, and so Israel’s strike must be supported as part of the Big Picture. Unspoken is that any diplomatic solution would involve undoing the genocide against Palestinians, which is the cause of the war.
This strikes me as fairly typical Jewish Neocon style magic thinking. It’s always a question of beating the opponent into submission—no matter how improbably the possibility and no matter how many times that approach has failed in the past—in preference to doing any sort of deal based on a just resolution. Nobody else can be allowed to have legitimate interests. The Neocons since the Clintons have positioned themselves to control policy (Trump was only a partial exception). The Pentagon may disagree but, short of an uprising of the military, the Pentagon will end up going along with those who set the policy. Needless to say, this is largely based on misreadings of the rest of the world—and especially of Iran and other related Shia groupings (Hezbollah, Houthis), of Palestinians, and of Russia and China. Iran, Russia, and China all understand what’s going on.
First I’ll provide a transcript of the closing portion of DD’s Intel Briefing, cued at 40:20. DD starts with a discussion of the claimed doc leak—like LJ he says it looks plausible. In light of what I said above, it seems likely that, if the leak is genuine, then it came from someone seeking to short circuit the attack on Iran—very likely, if true, someone in the military establishment who fears the consequences. With that in mind, DD then moves on to the remarks Zhou made to reporters regarding the overall situation in the Middle East as well as the nature and timing of Israel’s latest attack on Iran:
Now, the last thing I want to talk to you about is something else Biden said which, to my surprise, hasn't gotten a lot of notoriety in the western press here, but it probably should. We've been talking about the Hamas and the Hezbollah fight. Well, the the next biggest one on the horizon is what's gonna happen over the horizon, beyond Hezbollah into Iran.
Now, earlier this week--we didn't have a chance to highlight it here but I've seen it passed around on some X sources, etc., is there is an alleged American Top Secret document that was leaked by someone that gave a lot of detail on the preparation Israel has been making to launch a sustained and heavy raid against Iran, striking with ballistic missiles, with air power, and all kinds of other targets, arrays, and a lot of practicing that they've been doing, and rehearsals, etc.--physical rehearsals--indicating that it's probably close to when they're going to do something. Well, of course I have no way to know whether the document is valid or not. I actually looked at it online. It certainly looks valid. I've certainly seen plenty of Top Secret documents during my time on active duty, and it seems plausible and valid, but I don't have any way to independently assess that. What I can tell you is what the president of the United States said yesterday:
Q: Do you have any sense of a timeline? Are you putting more pressure on Netanyahu?
Zhou: There was an opportunity, in my view, and my colleagues agree, that you probably deal for the Israel and Iran in a way that is ends the conflict for a while.
Q: Say that again?
Zhou: It ends the conflict. In other words, it stops the back and forth. We think that there's a possibility of working to a ceasefire in Lebanon and it's gonna be harder in Gaza, but we agree that it has to be an outcome. What happens the day after.
Q: Mr. President, do you have a good understanding right now what Israel is going to do in response to Iran's October First attacks, and when they will actually respond, sir, to Iran?
Zhou: Yes and yes.
Q: Can you tell us?
Zhou: No and no.
Did you catch that? So, he said, number one: 'Yes, I know when Israel's going to do something, and I know what they're going to do. So, apparently that's a past tense deal. That's something that's been done and now we're just waiting on it to happen. In light of what I read in that alleged Top Secret document those things seem to line up, because it's probably going to be something pretty big. It's also important what he said right prior to that. He was asked, basically, how this whole situation is gonna get knocked out, and he said, 'Well, we think we have a chance for a ceasefire against Hezbollah and, it's going to be hard, but we're going to try something with Hamas.' But then he said, ‘We want to see a situation where all these wars are ended and Israel doesn't have to worry about this back and forth kind of thing.’So, what did he not say about Iran? He did not say anything about any kind of negotiated settlement or cease fire with Iran--only with Hamas and Hezbollah. And then he specified that he does see a kinetic response prepared by Israel against Iran. So that gives us every concern that this war could be exploding here soon.
We'll have to wait and see how that turns out but, by all accounts, both what's leaked and what the president--in front of everybody in the camera--said, Israel is going to do something. Apparently it's coming soon. Israel has said it's coming soon, and he knows what it is. I can't imagine it's going to be any kind of pin prick situation like what happened after the April Iranian attack, because the Israeli leaders at nearly every level have continued to say over and over, 'It's going to be lethal and it's going to be painful and it's going to catch them by surprise.'
So that's something we're going to be watching out for, because that is moving in the exact opposite direction of any kind of settlement of any of these wars. I mean, just imagine if Iran is actually hit, what possible reason would either Hamas or Hezbollah--or the Houthis for that matter--have to have a negotiated settlement? Iran would do everything it could to basically put those things on fire, and to hit Israel from as many directions as they could. So if we actually want any kind of negotiated settlement with those then we have to do something to have a a diplomatic outcome with Iran instead of the one that we appear to be heading towards.
Which is the point. Israel and its Jewish supporters adamantly do not want any sort of negotiated settlement. They want what they want. Period. You don’t negotiate with Amalek, except as a subterfuge prior to decapitation strikes—as in the case of Haniyeh and Nasrallah and any number of other examples of duplicity.
Now Iran has responded to Zhou’s remarks to the reporters. Iran won’t back down. They recognize that what the US is up to is a clear act of war against Iran. Russia is said to be trying to defuse this situation, but the Anglo-Zionists may be forcing Russia into taking a stand alongside Iran, because Iran is an existential matter for Russia, China, and BRICS. Does this seem like a smart thing for the Anglo-Zionists to be doing? Did I ever tell you that these people are anything other than crazy?
In response to President Biden's claim of knowing when and how Israel will respond, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that anyone aware of the timing and manner of an Israeli attack on Iran must be held accountable.
"Anybody with knowledge or understanding of 'how and when Israel was going to attack Iran' and/or providing the means and backing for such folly, should logically be held accountable for any possible causality," Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi tweeted on Saturday.
Earlier on Friday, Biden said he has insight into "how and when Israel is going to respond to the missile attacks by Iran," though he refrained from providing further details.
Who is pushing for this war in Ukraine and the Middle East? Who benefits from it? Where is the money coming from? Follow the money and you will understand!. Macgregor confirms in point and word exactly what this https://x.com/MEtirol/status/1759635448601698458… is trying to explain.
3:12
Quote
etirol 𝕊 @MEtirol
·
Feb 19
Who controls the USA? A simplified guide as Q&A
Q: Who controls the USA?
A: The Deep State, the CIA, but also very powerful lobby groups such as the Israel lobby group AIPAC or arms lobby groups
Q: Whose interests do the CIA, the Deep State and those lobby groups serve?
Christopher Hitchens on Palestine and Israel
https://x.com/i/status/1847540070770786315
CNN, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Rgime, is more concerned about identifying the leaker, than what has been leaked. https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/19/politics/us-israel-iran-intelligence-documents/index.html