Trump As Hitler--Setting Us Up For A Coup?

I want to briefly draw attention to two articles at The Federalist today. What they both attempt is to draw attention to the bigger agenda behind the desperate Trump as Hitler hoax that has come out in the open during the past week. The articles point to the motives behind this cynical ploy:

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

The hit piece in The Atlantic is part of a psy-op designed to provoke a third assassination attempt and justify mass post-election violence.

In light of the two assassination attempts on Trump that have followed on the unhinged rhetoric from the Establishment, I believe that it’s actually fair to assert that a third assassination attempt is hoped for. The Establishment attempt to deny any connection between the rhetoric and the acts and insistence on a continuation of the rhetoric amounts to a backhanded admission of that. However, the author, John Daniel Davidson, goes further:

The outlandish hit piece on Donald Trump published this week by Jeffery Goldberg at The Atlantic, which was immediately denied on the record by all the people who were in the room with Trump, isn’t just a shoddy smear that would never have passed muster in a newsroom 20 years ago.

It’s more than that. It’s part of a larger psy-op to justify mass post-election violence if Trump wins in November, to signal activists to reject the results of the election, to divide the military, and to coax an insurgency out of the radical left-wing base of the Democratic Party and unleash it on American cities.

Looking back to the violence in the Imperial City on the Potomac at the time of Trump’s inauguration as well as the violence leading up to the 2020 election—all tolerated by the Establishment—it’s difficult to argue against this scenario. Looking back, too, to the months long military occupation of the Imperial City after the 2020 election—as well as the wokeness of the military—one is also tempted to see this statement by Kama Sutra as a Freudian type statement of intent by the Establishment itself:

“He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him,” she said. “He wants a military that is loyal to him personally. One that will obey his orders even when he tells them to break the law or abandon their oath to the Constitution of the United States.”

Why am I bothering with this? Davidson focuses on what could happen if Trump wins, but I think it’s worth considering what could happen if the Establishment manages to once again install its preferred regime. The Left has pretty much cast aside any pretense of loyalty to the Constitution as written. I can see drastic steps being taken that could require military force. Never say never. And, of course, with economic disarray threatening …

After all, even if Kama Sutra is installed, it will have been a close call. Davidson, again, frames the issue in terms of a Trump win:

It’s hard to overstate how reckless and dangerous this is two weeks before an election that Harris appears to be losing. Having staked out this rhetorical ground, what is she supposed to say if she loses the election? How is she supposed to concede? Will she come out and say, “Sorry everyone we tried hard to save America but now you must all live peacefully under the new Hitler?”

She’s not going to say that. She can’t now. She’s going to call for resistance. “Patriotic resistance,” she might call it, but it will be coded as a call for street violence or worse. After all, you don’t just accept a Hitler-like, fascist regime. You fight it any way you can.

…

Is this reckless and dangerous? Is it designed to prepare the ground for mass violence? Is it assassination prep? Yes, it’s all those things. But understand that we’re not dealing with a normal political party here. We’re dealing with an ensconced institutional oligarchy that has already executed a coup against the previous Democrat nominee (and sitting president), forcing him to end his reelection campaign. They have already discarded millions of Democrat primary votes to install their hand-picked successor despite their claims to care about “preserving democracy.” They have already refused to tone down their incendiary rhetoric despite two assassination attempts against Trump.

But ask yourselves, if we have a second installation in a row, following on a continued refusal to set up anything resembling a transparent and fair electoral process, can the Establishment afford to allow a populist successor to Trump arise? Will affirmative steps to make that impossible need to be taken? Never say never. Win or lose, we’re in dangerous times.

The second article can be found here:

Debunked Atlantic Hit Piece Gives Kamala Pretext To Justify Political Violence Against Enemies