The Trump Doctrine: If We Don't Like Ya We'll Kill Ya
John Mearsheimer, speaking with Danny Davis, explains it—not that it needs much explaining. Monroe must be rotating in his grave. The Monroe doctrine was about keeping the Great Powers of the day out, not about allowing the US to act like a Great Power at the expense of its neighbors.
Trump met Xi, TRUMP BACKED DOWN: Tariffs Failed / John Mearsheimer
DD: The last thing I want to talk about--because it’s very much in line with something you mentioned a second ago about the morality and the the utility of our foreign policy--is what’s happening down around Venezuela at the moment, because by all accounts it it seems we just want to get rid of Maduro. We want a regime change war and we’ll get it. In fact, I think the latest offer is Maduro either voluntarily walks away, he’s assassinated, or he’s captured. And we’re saying that out loud in public. That doesn’t seem to follow international law as far as I’m aware. What do you say?
JM: Oh, there’s no question about that. But just to talk about the morality of our foreign policy, the United States is blowing boats out of the water and killing people who we don’t even know. We don’t even know who they are or what they’re doing. Supposedly they’re narco terrorists who are bringing drugs to the United States or terrorists to the United States. But there’s no evidence that that’s true. And, as we know, the US Navy has the capability to stop these ships, board them, and find out exactly who is on board and what those people are doing. You would think that the United States would do that before it just blew those ships, those boats, out of the water and killed all the people who were on the boats.
DD: What does this do to our--I don’t even say credibility--but to our interaction with other countries in the region, in our own hemisphere here, when you have the president of the United States--when asked about that issue--and Trump just says, ‘Yeah, I don’t wanna mess with that. I don’t wanna worry about a declaration of war. We’re just gonna kill ‘em.’ But is there any justification, internationally or otherwise, even domestically, to just summarily execute people because you suspect them of running drugs?
JM: No! He’s the assassin in chief. Period. He just thinks he has a right to kill anybody who he deems an enemy of the United States. He doesn’t need any evidence to support that decision. He doesn’t need to get approval from Congress. He is the assassin chief and he just does what he wants.
And you have the same situation with regard to the Maduro government. He has just decided that we have to get rid of Maduro and he’s going to go in there and figure out some clever way to do that. And, as you know, Danny, the United States has a rich history of behaving this way in the Western Hemisphere. ... And I think virtually all of our neighbors south of the border fully understand that the United States is a ruthless country when it comes to running the Western Hemisphere, and they better be very careful that they don’t anger the United States.
DD: Do you ever see a scenario in the future where all of these things building up--going back to the ‘ 50s, ‘60s, maybe even before that--can come back to haunt us?
JM: Well, with regard to the western hemisphere, we are so powerful and so secure that we can behave in careless and ruthless ways. And, by the way, during the unipolar moment--you know, from roughly 1992 up to about 2017, when we were the only great power on the planet and were remarkably powerful relative to everybody else and remarkably secure back here in the western hemisphere--we were able to behave in very cavalier and careless ways. We got in the habit of acting that way and it’s carried over now into this multipolar world. But the United States--despite all the talk about how dangerous the world is and how vulnerable we are to this threat and that threat--the United States is the most secure great power in the history of the world. We’re remarkably powerful. And if you look at our geographical location, it just doesn’t get any better. You have Canada to the north, Mexico to the south, fish to the east, and fish to the west. I mean, this is the ideal strategic situation, and it allows us to just do all these foolish things that would get other countries into deep trouble, but don’t get us into much trouble. And someone like President Trump, he understands this. He understands how powerful we are. He understands what all the levers of power are and he understands he can do pretty much everything and get away with it.

. Kill and Replace the Regime
There is very little doubt in my mind that Trump will attempt Assassination of Maduro
Israeli / Palantir or US technology - they are following Maduro every move right now and mapping sites he may be in - just like Israeli programs did in Gaza
The US is also following Maduro close leadership likely on the kill list
"The Gospel", an Israeli military AI system developed by Unit 8200 (the IDF's signals intelligence unit).
Lavender: An AI tool that profiled Gazans
Where's Daddy?: This was a follow-up alert system tied to Lavender and The Gospel
Palantir's Gotham platform
While the US Fleet is present and Officially this is framed as counter-narcotics enforcement --- The US fleet is there for disruption or civil unrest and TO PUT THE WOMAN - María Corina Machado --- in charge and to protect her
. Kill Maduro and his close Venezuelan allies - Stick Machado in the office - protect Machada
That's the theory
.
I don’t think we have to guess with the war is going to break out with Venezuela. We have the Gerald Ford carrier task force on his way, and it will be there by Monday.
So does the war start next week? Why not! When you think about the cost per day of what we are spending to put a fleet down there off the coast it’s a staggering. I saw figure a few weeks ago of $12 million a day. Once the Ford carrier task force arrives, I would imagine the cost will be 25 million a day at a minimum. We cannot keep the fleet down there definitely spending that kind of money.
So that logically leads to the conclusion that some type of war is going to take place .
Who would’ve thought nine months ago when Trump came back into office, we would be on the precipice of looking at a war in Venezuela, the other possibility of war breaking out with Iran, and dealing with Ukraine, Russia, all at the same time.
Who is telling Trump that we have the resources to do all of this? It’s obvious that we don’t. I can only assume that Trump and his intergroup somehow think Venezuela is going to be a pushover and that Madura will be removed and Mrs. Machado will be put into office. The problem with her is she’s not even popular in Venezuela. No one likes her.
And then what are we to make of the addition to as long as we’re down there let’s take over Cuba and teach them a lesson we’ve been wanting to do for 65 years . What kind of insanity would that be and yet I won’t be surprised if Trump does this.
What excuse will we use to take over Cuba and enforce regime change there?
When the historians right about the year 2025 what will they say? What will they think about Donald Trump?