Two short tweets by Robert Malone explain it to what should be any reasonable person’s satisfaction:
Now, pay attention to this next bit. Yes, it explains more about the craziness of vaxxing kids—especially re the boosters, and more on that further down—but it also applies to everyone else who gets injected. “Repeated jabs are likely to exacerbate this.”
Now, what that tweet is linking you to is a Substack article that spells all this out in plain(er) English:
Mass vaccination may permanently attenuate population-wide immunity to SARS-2
Original Antigenic Sin and the Public Health England vaccine surveillance data.
13 hr ago207186
Alex Berenson notices a small admission tucked away on page 23 of the latest Public Health England [PHE] vaccine surveillance report. According to “recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data, … N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.”
This is evidence that our vaccines may permanently compromise immunity to SARS-2, via Original Antigenic Sin — the phenomenon, long observed in the antibody response to influenza infections, that initial exposure to a pathogen (or a spike protein) shapes all subsequent immune responses to mutated, recombined or reassorted instances of that pathogen. Our Corona vaccines elicit antibodies against the spike protein alone, while natural infection provokes antibodies against other virus proteins as well, including the nucleocapsid or N protein. The broad spectrum of natural immune response is why recovered individuals enjoy much greater and longer-lasting protection, than people who have been merely vaccinated.
The vaccinators have always insisted that there’s nothing to see here. You can get the spike-specific protection of vaccination, they say, and pick up broader-based protection from low-risk natural infection later on. The problem, though, is that the vaccines appear to influence subsequent immune response, focusing antibodies on legacy spike and making it much easier for SARS-2 to escape immune resistance. Potentially for good, and in billions of people.
…
Read the rest with this in mind …
This is the slippery slope that these maniacs want to place the kids on. And none of this takes into account the adverse effects.
Since pictures help visualize—duh!—here’s a chart:
In the very same PHE report, we find an updated version of what is becoming the world’s most disturbing graph. Infections in the vaccinated continue to outpace infections in the unvaccinated by ever greater amounts, and it’s just no longer credible to claim that this is a statistical error:
But to end on a lighter note, because I LMAOed at this one:
Meanwhile, more treatment options:
2 New Studies Test Quercetin and COVID-19 Outcomes
Studies suggest this antiviral, anti-blood clotting, anti-inflammatory is an effective therapeutic
"Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, good doctors have done what good doctors do and have given their patients safe and effective therapeutics to treat COVID-19.
While public health officials said nothing could be done, many doctors applied lessons learned from previous viral infections and helped their patients support their immune systems with safe measures that have a known history.
Common measures suggested by those doctors have included the use of vitamin D and antioxidants. As the pandemic wears on, mounting evidence points to the efficacy of many of these treatments, including quercetin.”
More on querecetin here. I believe some commenters have mentioned using it. So far it has survived the “cancellation" of HCQ and Ivermectin and NAC” as Pharma hustles to get its expensive “new” therapeutics on the market...
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/2-new-studies-test-quercetin-and-covid-19-outcomes_4051356.html?
"This is the slippery slope that these maniacs want to place the kids on."
These people MUST pay a steep, steep price for their maniacal evil. I would lay down my life to keep my grandchildren from getting jabbed.