Discussion about this post

User's avatar
History Lass's avatar

One can assume, the missles, NATO / US personnel needed for Intel, coordinates as well as hands on operators of said long range missles are already in place and ready to go.

They should be very very concerned about their safety. Russia knows where all the NATO/ US players are.

So McGovern and G.Doctorow feel that President Putin would not respond to a long range missile attack before Nov 5th? How could he not?

Or do they mean Putin will not respond to this escalatory game of words and threats?

Where do you think China and Iran stand, if this really goes unthinkable? Strike one and the other two enter the fray?

Expand full comment
Stephen McIntyre's avatar

I personally cannot understand if we went to war with Russia before the election how that possibly benefits Kamala Harris. While I understand, the built-in animosity against the Russians is going back 80 years. Would people really be on the forefront of supporting a war with Russia under the circumstances we were discussing? Would people really want to take the risk of a war going nuclear? I can certainly see Russia finally using tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine if that’s what it comes to. What will be the response? No one in this country is going to want to send their kids to war in Ukraine against Russia. The insanity of the neocons is beyond the pale there are no winners in any kind of nuclear war war. so somehow people are going to support Kamala Harris and the prospect of 100 million people being killed in this country due to the stupidity of our leaders. I don’t believe Trump under any circumstances with Support something like this. He’s not that stupid he would be looking for peace. Certainly not a duel with Vladimir Putin.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts