UPDATED: Specifics On Brennan's Fraudulent ICA Production
Fred Fleitz will be doing an interview in which he states that CIA has been concealing a House Intelligence report that provides evidence that Putin and Russia wanted Hillary to win. This evidence was considered "strong" by CIA analysts but was excluded from the ICA over their objections by John Brennan. "Weak" evidence that maybe Russia wanted Trump to win was included by Brennan over the objections of the same CIA analysts:
TONIGHT 8pm ET 📺👉https://t.co/nT5simhWyH
Former NSC chief-of-staff: There’s an unpublished @HouseIntel report stuck at @CIA since 2018 which contradicts the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference in the 2016 election.
@FredFleitz on @AmThoughtLeader 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/b9eDgg3h4t
— Jan Jekielek 😷 (@JanJekielek) May 3, 2020
UPDATE: I really should have added an explanation for why I find this important. The point of this is that the ICA was the justification for everything that came afterwards, it was the "proof" of what "everybody" claimed to know: That Trump had to be investigated for colluding with the Russians who had tried to help him win the election. It was behind the DNC hack narrative, the Wikileaks narrative, the Roger Stone persecution. But most of all it was behind the Mueller Witchhunt.
By revealing Brennan's dishonesty in overriding the CIA analysts Durham can use that as evidence of conspiratorial intent. It's an element of proving intent--not the whole ball of wax--but it's important in that respect. This explains why Durham has apparently spent so much time interviewing analysts who were part of the ICA team, and also why he wants to talk to Gina Haspel--if he hasn't done so already. Has she been concealing that report? She and Chris Wray may find themselves in the same or similar boats, very soon.