I’ve had occasion in the past to praise the work of Wire Points, a site that focuses on Illinois politics and public policy issues. Part of the site is a daily update on the Covid situation in the state—we all know how difficult it is to pry Covid stats free from the government data guardians, and Wire Points is doing the Lord’s work for IL in that regard.
However, what I want to do here is briefly excerpt some of the comments that appeared at the site today:
Illinois’ COVID-19 data: Daily update for November 19, 2021 – Wirepoints
Just the other day I was remarking to my wife to this effect:
I’d really like to know what the situation is regarding the health status of people with these “breakthrough” cases. We know that the unvaxxed who die from or with Covid are overwhelmingly suffering from multiple life threatening co-morbidities. If that had changed, if Covid were now somehow affecting healthier individuals, I’m sure we’d be hearing about that—but we’re not. Therefore, I assume the situation with regard to the unvaxxed remains about the same.
But with these breakthrough cases, we keep hearing about “unexpected deaths” of youngish, healthy vaxxed unfortunates. I’m not the only one getting that impression:
Granted, that tends to be anecdotal, but we’re not hearing any solid data. Instead we get anecdotal stuff from people who know better—which is suspicious. What’s the deal with “breakthrough” cases? Are most of these people who have serious co-morbidities? Or what?
So that’s what’s been on my mind, among other things. The comments at Wire Points today, while of course anecdotal, point toward real data that should be alarming to anyone concerned about these matters. This morning I suggested that I sensed some panic among the rulers. Well, read on … You’ll see that comment #2 directly addresses my remarks to my wife. Here’s the spoiler version: In IL—and there’s no reason to believe the situation is any different anywhere else—breakthrough cases are nearly half of all cases, and half of breakthrough deaths have no co-morbidities. Yikes!
1. Not the Senator's Son
I have a close friend, a retired police officer who’s wife left nursing last year and was 40 years in the field of heart work. She will not take this gene therapy drug.
Their son is a GP doctor at a major Illinois hospital. He is refusing it.
The doc said they are finding very unusual things in the hearts and blood of those who were treated with this therapy.
I wonder why docs and nurses are not lining the streets to speak truth.
We need them to tell the truth.
2. Rfb321
Reply to Not the Senator's Son
Add to that. The vaccine is underperforming expectations. By a lot. Been to the IDPH [IL Dept. of Public Health] breakthrough site this week? No? okay, last week 43% of deaths were fully vaccinated. 50% of those had cobmorbidities Thus, 50% did not. That means that 21.5% of last weeks deaths were otherwise healthy vaccinated folks. THAT was not on the brochure! The spin is “Yeah but those were probably the earlier vaxed (like six or more months ago), and unfortunately, the efficiency is wearing off, so boost up. Twice a year
3. Freddy
Here is a detailed look from VAERS database. Lot to digest.
https://vaersanalysis.info/2021/11/12/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-11-05-2021/
[Comment: VAERS is currently showing over 18K deaths]
4. rfb321
Reply to Freddy
This summary report is an extraction from the CDC’s VEARS data base. I went thru the steps listed on the website that shows you how to go to the actual CDC VAERS report and verify the accuracy of the summary. It is all correct. I then did some more research on the CDC VAERS data base. There are some inaccuracies in the daily data collection and the way it is submitted. Okay fine. I’ll agree to that. But how far off is it? Even at 50%, it pretty shocking data. But, if this was only 50% correct, why would the CDC go to all the expense and effort to create and maintain VAERS? They would not. So, then shall we say it is 75% accurate? Still, would the CDC maintain and publish data for public consumption that is 25% bad? i Again no. What am I missing?
5. Paul
Reply to rfb321
You are not missing anything. If anything the data is understated. It takes about an hour for a hospital to draft and submit a VAERS report and a lot of them are not doing it.
The empirically verifiable reality is no longer anecdotal beyond the refusals to properly assemble the data.
I noted late last week that the CDC has major data categories where they simply have not bothered to update since August. It's convenient I guess.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/dont-unless-ready-suffer-die-california-man-died-covid-19-vaccine-described-horrific
The worst possible outcome of “vaxxing” - this 56 year old man was urged by his doctor to have the Moderna vax. (I know about doctor urging. My doctor has turned icy and curt after she failed to convince me. And remains so.)