Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray-SoCa's avatar

I back Trumps decision on the INF treaty because it was aimed more at countering China, and the need for medium range missiles in the Pacific. China was not a party to the treaty. I did not see war with Russia coming, so I did not see Russia as a threat. I wonder how much more Land Russia will occupy by Trumps inauguration.

Cdr Salamander point is the U.S. is seen as a weak horse:

https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/p/in-case-youve-missed-it-the-usa-is?

More trying to kneecap Trump by the deep state? Or pressure on Israel? Or a real threat Israel to annex the West Bank?

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/force-evacuation-and-smash-the-camps?

Trumps appointments about vaccines and Covid are very exciting. I don’t expect much excitement on releasing Covid stuff, but may be the Covid injury stuff that has been hidden is earth shattering.

What if RFK releases real data showing a relationship between vaccines and autism? A huge political firestorm will ensue.

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/the-bulk-of-credible-science-finds

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/over-300-pages-of-evidence-from-the?

And Trumps fcc nominee is very anti censorship.

And California is still counting ballots. I’m surprised that ballots without postmarks can be received up to 7 days after Election Day.

Expand full comment
NFO's avatar

Found it curious that by late afternoon (DC time) yesterday there were AFU-affiliated claims that Russia was readying an RS-26 to be fired from Astrakhan, potentially, at Kiev. I imagine that the Russians let that info slip out to bolster the "you can't stop this" psych effect when the first attack using this specific weapon actually occurred. Wouldn't think US/NATO ISR would be so effective as to pick up a readying for launch all the way over near the Caspian/Kazakhstan.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts