This morning I started my daily trip through the news. I soon came across an interesting article dealing with the appeal of a lawsuit against the FDA. The lawsuit was brought by three doctors (Paul Marik is a name readers may recognize) who claim that they were professionally harmed by anti-Ivermectin statements made by the FDA. That harm included being terminated for trying to prescribe ivermectin to patients. The three doctors lost at the district court level, but have appealed. Oral arguments on appeal before a three judge panel (all Trump appointees) took place this past week. The Epoch Times has a very full account of the case, which you can read here:
FDA Drops Ivermectin Bombshell: Now explicitly recognizes that doctors DO have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID
Epoch Times ^ | 08/11/2023 | Zachary Steiber
What’s interesting about the oral arguments is that the FDA was forced to make a number of damning admissions. For example, despite all the FDA PSAs that misrepresented Ivermectin as a “horse medicine”, telling people to “Stop it”, i.e., stop using Ivermectin for Covid, the government lawyer stated:
“FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,” Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
The three doctors maintain that the FDA is interfering with their lawful practice of medicine:
“The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no,” Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court.
Nevertheless, the FDA constantly dunned into the public consciousness that Ivermectin is not “authorized or approved” for use against Covid. This was then seized upon by state agencies and professional associations to stomp on physicians and pharmacists who might wish to prescribe Ivermectin to patients for Covid.
In the oral arguments the FDA claimed they were responding to people who were self medicating with horse versions of Ivermectin, rather than the human versions for parasites. Two problems: That doesn’t address the issue of prescriptions by physicians, and the FDA claim that their "Stop it” admonitions were “quips” seems distinctly disingenuous. The judges, judging from the ET account, weren’t buying that stuff. They recognized that the claim that the FDA was just kidding, was using public money to issues “quips”, was really just a dodge to get around the fact that the FDA is not empowered to offer medical advice. Doctors do that. Ivermectin is a drug that’s approved for human use. Doctors are the ones to advise patients whether and how to use it.
I think we all know what’s going on here. On one level, it’s well known that the FDA is in the pocket of Big Pharma—that’s a group that would qualify for Senator Johnson’s characterization: a powerful group of people. If doctors used cheap Ivermectin to cure Covid patients, what would happen to Big Pharma’s obscene mRNA injection profits? On another level, many suspect that the FDA was covering also for the Deep State people with globalist connections who were the ones pushing these injections on an unsuspecting public. That seems to have been what Ron Johnson was really getting at in a conversation with Maria Bartiromo this past week:
MB: Yeah, but what're you gonna do about it? What can you do about it? Because the censorship does not stop there. They are, in the White House, creating their narrative and running with it--whether it has to do with Trump, whether it has to do with Biden, whether it has to do with the money he's taking in. Whether it has to do with Covid. We're learning today that the FDA is saying that it's OK to take Ivermectin if you have Covid. [Johnson smiles and nods.] Senator, I remember talking with you repeatedly during Covid about your upset, that they were trying to cancel you, because you were talking to doctors to try to find out the right ways to treat Covid, without having to get too many boosters and Covid shots. I remember. I took Ivermectin and it was hard to do because initially the pharmacists wanted to report my doctor. It was hard to get my doctor to finally prescribe Ivermectin. He did. My Covid was gone in a day when I took Ivermectin and now, three years later, the FDA says, 'Oh yeah, that's fine, take that Ivermectin.' What?
RJ: Maria, you know the doctors I've been dealing with, talking to for years now. They believe, probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied early treatment. They were denied it because the FSA sabotaged Ivermectin and said, "Come on ya'll, you're not a cow, you're not a horse." This was supposedly horse medicine. No, it was a Nobel prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives. It did save many, many lives because people did have doctors with courage and the compassion to actually treat patients using it, putting at risk their medical licenses.
Fortunately, we do have reporters like yourself, like John Solomon, who do have the courage to report the truth against the mainstream media and against the narrative. But that's the only way this is gonna be solved. We need the truth to be exposed, we need more Americans to listen to the truth, to be exposed to the truth, to pull their heads out of the sand, quite honestly, and open their eyes and understand what has happened in this country.
Yeah, right! So … what has happened in this country?
We are going down a very dangerous path, but it's a path that is being laid out and planned by an elite group of people that want to take total control over our lives. That's what they're doing, bit by bit. They do it by increasing massive government spending, increasing the size of government, take over of the WHO--these amendments coming up that are going to be voted on in 2024 at the WHO are frightening. They really risk taking away all of our sovereignty. People have to awaken to the dangers of the moment.
MB: It is just extraordinary to me that the government was working with social media to amplify lies and suppress truth and has been doing so repeatedly. We just saw the Facebook story, the Twitter files, all the way, government officials from the CDC, FBI, CIA. According to the reporters working on the Twitter files, a thousand people worked with social media to amplify lies and suppress truth.
Why couldn't the American people know that there were other alternatives to treat Covid? Why can't the American people know that there were side effects with the vaccine?
RJ: This is all preplanned by an elite group of people, that is what I am talking about--Event 201 that occurred in late 2019, prior to the rest of us knowing about the pandemic. Again -- this is very concerning in terms of what is happening, what continues to be planned for our loss of freedom. It needs to be exposed, but unfortunately, very few people even in Congress are willing to take a look at this. They all pushed the vaccine, they don't want to be made aware of the fact that vaccines might have caused injuries, might have caused death. So many people simply just don't want to admit they were wrong and they're going to do everything they can to make sure they're not proven wrong.
We are up against a very powerful group of people here, Maria.
A handy way to place Event 201 is to read a bit at the Wikipedia page for Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security—that was the outfit that sponsored Event 201 and similar “tabletop exercises.” There you can learn about the CHS and, if you follow the links, you’ll find out about Open Philanthropy the outfit that provides most of the funding for the CHS—who they are, what their goals are, their deep involvement in politics. What—you thought CHS was funded by tuition money? After that, the brief description of Event 201 becomes more meaningful:
Event 201
On October 18, 2019, the CHS partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to host the tabletop exercise Event 201 in New York City.[30][31] According to the CHS, "the exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences".[30]
Event 201 simulated the effects of a fictional coronavirus passing to humans via infected pig farms in Brazil with "no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year".[32] The simulation ended after 18 months with 65 million deaths from the coronavirus.
A cynic might translate that in reverse, to read something like: If we want to transform America into a Fascist state dominated by “public/private partnerships” (the definition of Fascist or Corporatist governance) run by self designated powerful elite groups of experts, staging a pandemic would be a really cool way to do that.
They sound like “a powerful group of people.”
Ed Dowd’s reaction—and we hope he’s safe on Maui—reacts to all this:
Ed Dowd: The COVID Vax Is “The Greatest Fraud I’ve Ever Seen in My Life”
“We won’t be talking about this for the next ten years. We’ll be talking about this for the next two centuries. This is going to impact everybody throughout the globe for years to come.”
“This is what we call democide, death by government.”
He also calls it a crime, and I certainly won’t argue against that assessment.
Marc Morano ties all this in with past scares, which failed to fundamentally transform America. Perhaps a pandemic was what they figured was needed, after the pseudo science failed to work. You’ve seen this kind of schematic before, but it’s good as a reminder:
All Pre-‘Climate Change’ Environmental Scares Had Same Globalist “Solutions”
All environmental scares prior to “climate change”, including “overpopulation” and “global cooling”, conveniently had the same pre-fabricated globalist “solutions”.
“The solutions to all of these previous environmental scares was always the same: more government control, more sovereignty limiting treaties, an end to private property rights, an end to free markets, massive wealth redistribution.”
Step 1: Manufacture the public perception of a “crisis”, using non-stop mainstream media propaganda.
Step 2: Use the same mainstream media to generate the desired public reaction to the manufactured, non-existent “crisis”: fear, anxiety, helplessness etc.
Step 3: Swoop in with pre-fabricated “solutions” to the manufactured, non-existent “crisis”: sacrificing national sovereignty, representative democracy, economic prosperity, individual freedoms etc, under the guise of solving the manufactured, non-existent “crisis”.
Step 4: A general public that would otherwise have been resistant to the proposed “solutions”, desperate to alleviate their manufactured sense of fear and helplessness, now not only welcomes them, but—in fact—demands them.
Step 5: Rinse and repeat.
It just might be that with Covid the globalists—the group of powerful people—finally achieved liftoff for the Great Reset. Now, it’s true that there does appear to be a reaction to the Covid Hoax—how strong that is, is difficult to gauge. We won’t know how conditioned people have become to obeying orders until the next go round. On the other hand, I worry that many people have simply withdrawn into a “safe place” security shell, sheltering in place in their circumscribed daily lives, rather than toughening themselves up spiritually and intellectually. Time will tell. But here’s Morano again. If you follow the link you’ll be able to view a brief but very good video all about this “powerful group of people.”
Former US government insider and author of 'The Great Reset', Marc Morano, on Klaus Schwab's recent G20 speech:
Klaus Schwab: “What we have to confront is a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of our world. Und ziss will take some time. And so the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.”
"He's talking about us essentially giving up national sovereignty, giving up individual freedoms, and turning over rule to experts... This whole agenda is to make it so we have no choice on some of the biggest questions of our lives."
"We didn't get to vote on whether gas powered cars would be banned, we didn't vote for vaccine mandates, we didn't vote for lockdowns, we didn't vote for banning of meat. But all of this is happening, because at these meetings like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, they meet and they work with government-corporate collusion to bypass democracy and impose stuff through this corporate government fascism."
What’s significant about this G20 summit is Schwab is being treated like a head of state.
For more content like this, visit:
https://wide-awake-media.com
#KlausSchwab #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #UnitedNations #Agenda2030 #Agenda21
1:14 / 3:24
God bless Senator Johnson’s tireless efforts, especially on behalf of the vaccine-injured. He's a gem, as are the doctors who were brave and compassionate enough to prescribe Ivermectin.
Good explanation of the damage the Vax Mandate has done to the US Military. People feel betrayed. I am sure a lot of employees that got forced to get the jab to keep their job feel the same.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/thinning-the-ranks