Robert Malone Offers A Big Picture On The Covid Regime And What It Portends

First of all, a hat tip to commenter Ray So-cal for alerting me to Malone’s new substack post. I try to keep up with Malone, but sometimes things get past.

In Malone’s presentation he tries to answer some basic questions about how we wound up living under the Covid Regime, and especially what drove the development of the mRNA Covid injections that have been so much a part of that regime. In other words, he tries to explain in a rational way why the mRNA technology was pushed on us, what’s driving the Covid Regime? Why was this respiratory virus treated so differently from seasonal influenza or the common cold?

We know that any number of basic safeguards that have long been in place at the FDA were ignored in the rush to a vaccine rollout. Malone’s idea is that we should regard this as not simply the result of human error but as the result of a strong human motivation that overrode well known cautions. So, with that in mind, he frames the key question in this way:

What was the unmet medical need that was being addressed?

His answer is this: The medical need—discussed below—was defined as both a medical need as well as a serious matter of national security. As a result, the drive behind what became the Covid Regime—and especially the Covid injections—was driven not only by “medical need” but by national security concerns. That means that in order to arrive at an understanding of where we stand today we need to understand the Deep State’s involvement. And so Malone’s title runs:

mRNA Vaccines: The CIA and National Defense

Malone’s background for getting into this big picture approach is that Malone worked for many years for DTRA, Defense Threat Reduction Agency Chem Bio Division. That is the agency that seeks to address the threat posed by bio-weapons.

Malone’s presentation is quite dense, partly because it’s presented in a live, oral context. What I’ll do here is provide a summary of his general thesis so that readers who wish to go to Malone’s full presentation will have a bit of a roadmap.

Here’s what Malone says is driving the attempt to develop mRNA technology into a new vaccine platform. We face a serious problem with regard to the threat of bio-weapons. Since WW2, bio-weapons have become radically easier to develop and produce, but the traditional vaccines have not kept pace with the new technology:

… with traditional vaccine technology, we anticipate having vaccines, if everything goes well, for all of the bio-warfare agents deployed up until the end of World War II, ... by the year 2050 …

In the meantime, bio-weapon development has advanced by leaps and bounds:

The problem we have is that the technology to enable individuals to engineer bio-weapons has become so trivial that a college senior working out of their … garage with stuff they can get off of eBay, can easily recreate the most lethal pathogen combinations that our government came up with in the bio-warfare program that we ran for years.

Thus the challenge was to find some new platform for vaccine development that enable the rapid response to new pathogens that isn’t possible using established vaccine development methods:

That's the unmet medical need and the justification underlying this. That there is an unmet need for some technology, that will now allow rapid response to both emerging pathogens and engineered pathogens such as bio-warfare or terrorism-based pathogens.

Importantly, this research has been going on for many decades—since WW2. Initially, researchers focused on monoclonal antibodies as the basis for the desired new vaccine platform. However, this technology proved too cumbersome. And so, about ten years ago, the Deep State—DARPA, which is basically directed by CIA—turned to already existing technology that had been discarded: RNA.

The truth is that DARPA, which is the operational development arm, basically the CIA, fell in love with the RNA technology over a decade ago. ... This is a CIA program. There's no ambiguity here. I'm not telling state secrets.

The technology was basically pulled out of the trash can, ... Then it was advanced very aggressively by DARPA. DARPA funded and basically built Moderna. ... What you're seeing is the power of the intelligence community and the new bio-defense industrial complex that's developed since the anthrax attacks and it really goes beyond that in being able to push their agenda through the government.

Malone is willing to give the people involved in these programs the benefit of the doubt. He believes that they consider that they are addressing a very real and supremely important problem that could conceivably threaten our national existence. The difficulty he sees is that the RNA technology is basically gene therapy, and it won’t work as a vaccine platform technology. However, the researchers have ignored this basic fact—as Malone sees it from his years at the Salk Institute—and have attempted, in essence, to force the issue:

… gene therapy wasn't going to work because the new genes that are the good genes are seen by the immune system as just different. They're producing different proteins, and your immune system doesn't know whether it's a good protein or a bad protein. It just knows that it's a different protein. It will attack it.

            And that turned out to be the logic flaw in gene therapy. And they still haven't solved that. 

As Malone points out, Merck spent over a billion dollars trying to develop RNA technology into a vaccine platform, but the effort failed and Merck gave up on it. Years later, CIA gave it another try and got it to work—to the extent that we’ve seen over the past three years. The problem was that, while the new technology worked on paper, it hasn’t worked as well in practice. Not only do the “vaccines” not appear to be effective in preventing transmission and infection, but they have also led to alarming levels of side effects and mortality.

The key problem lies in the mechanism of these medications. The mRNA Covid injections introduce the toxic spike protein into the body and reprogram cells to produce more of the spike protein. In concept, mRNA was supposed to be localized in the deltoid muscle and would be flushed out of the system within a few hours, so that the risk would be minimal. The body’s cells would be programmed to identify the toxic spike protein and attack it. We now know that in reality the mRNA and the toxic spike protein travels throughout the body and persists for no less than two months, continuing to spread the spike protein everywhere in far larger amounts than was expected.

All sorts of problems arise from these basic facts, and Malone explains it in detail. Basically, the original formulations for RNA based medications suffered from a serious flaw—they were all highly inflammatory, and still are. The challenge for the developers was to address that issue, and they did so by substituting a synthetic form of uridine—pseudouridine. The problem with this is that pseudouridine modifies the formulations in many ways, and its biology is not well understood. Malone contends that one side effect from the use of pseudouridine has been to prevent the mRNA from breaking down as envisioned, leading to the huge spread of spike protein throughout the body. The reason behind this mistake was all too human:

They've pushed the technology because they want it so badly because the unmet medical need is so profound. They're so afraid of the risk, in part because we're creating that risk. But that's another story. And they wanted to have something that would be universal, that they could apply for any new pathogen and that could go straight from gene to vaccine. That's the idea.

And what they did is they kind of rushed things without understanding it.

I hope you noticed what Malone said: The risk that they fear may, in part, be a risk that we—the US Deep State—created. He moves on after simply tossing that out, but that’s a serious issue. In essence, the question arises whether this research that’s being conducted around the world in US controlled labs (many in Ukraine) is truly defensive or may also be motivated by the desire to build new bio-weapons for offensive use under the cover of defensive research. That question may color how we view the whole Covid Regime, as well. The new vaccine platform, capable of rapid deployment, may be largely intended to shield the users of offensive bio-weapons from the harmful effects of the weapons they deploy.

Now, all of these problems in the development of these Covid injections should have been caught by the FDA before the Emergency Authorization was ever issued:

The big story here underlying all this fraud … is the FDA did not do its job. FDA did not do its job, I think, because it was being pushed into a position of having to go along with what the intelligence community wanted and all of the push from the White House and everywhere else that we needed to have this technology, we needed to have this technology deployed globally. And so, we're going to just allow a lot of corners to be cut.

They wanted so badly for this new technology to work that they even changed the definition of “vaccine” so that it could be applied to this new gene therapy—so they could market the injections as vaccines rather than as what they are: experimental gene therapies. The advantage that this redefinition provided was that it allowed the Big Pharma companies to sidestep the very strict FDA gene therapy safety checklist and more or less skate through with the vaccine checklist.

We’ve been living with the results of this for three years, and only now are we starting to see tough questions being asked:

Finally, at the beginning of this year, with this paper published in January, a group from Stanford University asked the questions. How long is the RNA there? How long is the protein, spike protein being made? How much spike protein is being made? Fundamental questions that should have been known at the very beginning. But the FDA did not force the pharmaceutical companies to do those tests because they justified it. They did a little hand waving. They said, "These are not gene therapy products. These are vaccine products." Now that's a lie, a convenient lie, but that's what they did and that allowed them to justify only applying the vaccine safety checklist at the FDA rather than also applying the gene therapy checklist.

Woops! What the Stanford researchers found out was very disturbing, because—remember—the spike protein is toxic. It kills mammalian cells it comes in contact with:

What they found was that the levels of … spike protein in the blood of these [vaccinated] patients were much higher than the levels of spike protein found after infection. With infection, the virus is slowly starting to replicate in your nose and your oral pharynx and your mouth and your upper respiratory tract and your immune system is kicking in and starting to neutralize that, and they're having a fight as a gradual balance and it results in a slow growth in the amount of antigen.

            With the RNA, [the] body gets a truckload of spike antigen that's basically dumped into his bloodstream on a very short time course, very different from natural infection. And so when people say, "Well, why would you see toxicity with the spike protein from the vaccines and not see the same... Why would it be worse with the vaccines than with the infection?" Well, because of dosing, there's so much more protein being produced, and by the way, it's being produced for a long time, about 60 days or longer. They didn't test beyond 60 days. …

Malone goes into lots of detail about all this, but the bottom line is: Corners were cut, and that resulted in side effects and mortality from the injections, the magnitude of which were unparalleled. They fell in love with the concept, and failed to work through the basic safety and toxicology issues. And that leads Malone, after more technical details, to the disturbing issue of information warfare—propaganda—which we’re seeng manifested in so many areas of our societal life. The love for the concept blinded the Deep State into deciding that the supposedly good end justified all means—including cutting corners and lying about it:

Now, how and why is this being pushed? Obviously, we've all experienced the propaganda and censorship … This is uncontrolled information warfare, unrestricted information warfare at a level the world has never seen before. We have a situation in which all of the major media is controlled by large financial entities that happen to be the same ones that control the pharmaceutical industry. And functionally, control our government. What we've seen is that the propaganda information warfare blocking of anybody disclosing adverse events, like all of you that got up and said you've known of people directly that have either died or been damaged. I've been vaccine damaged. That's not allowed to be discussed.

            It's not allowed to be discussed because of the potential impact on the deployment of this product, which they believe that the ends justify the means. That it is absolutely essential that they get the world to be able to accept this new technology because if they don't... And there's all the other agendas about the vaccine card, and the personal ID and central bank digital currency, et cetera. But, at the fundamental level, there's a belief that this technology is so important that we have to push it through the entire population. And we have to get people to accept it. And so, that's so important that they believe that they were justified in deploying the largest propaganda effort the world has ever seen.

And perhaps most disturbing of all, in the face of the mortality and adverse events on such a huge scale, the Deep State is doubling down:

We've now seen this deployed with the new boosters. The FDA position is that changes in the mRNA sequence for similar payloads do not require substantial non-clinical or clinical data. What that means is what we've seen. They went to manufacturing, sales, and deployment of these new vaccines with virtually no real testing. To the extent that they did any testing in mice what they found was that it didn't in any way interfere with infection of those mice by the pathogen. It didn't work in the mice. It doesn't matter. They've all agreed that this is the new rules.

Note this well: Other countries are putting the breaks on. Our Deep State is pushing ahead. These are the same people who are playing nuclear poker with Russia, so it does raise questions about what is really behind all this.

Now, you will have noticed that Malone focuses strictly on the injections—not on the virus itself, and its origins. He does, however, remark almost parenthetically that it is now known that the virus was on the loose no later than September, 2019. We also know that the injections for this virus may have actually been in preparation not long after that. That raises the interesting question of whether Covid was, in effect, a full dress rehearsal for the new vaccine platform—deliberately loosed on an unsuspecting public. In that regard, it is now about as official as you can expect that SARS-Cov2 is an engineered virus:

"Substantial Evidence" COVID-19 Result Of Wuhan Laboratory "Incident": Senate Report

Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance

It’s the moment we all knew was coming. Well, most of us, at least. 

A Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions interim report from October 27, 2022 titled “An Analysis of the Origins of the COVID19 Pandemic” has revealed that the origins of Covid were more likely based in a lab as part of a “research related incident” and not zoonotic.

…

"…, nearly three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, critical evidence that would prove that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and resulting COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a natural zoonotic spillover is missing.”

“Such gaps include the failure to identify the original host reservoir, the failure to identify a candidate intermediate host species, and the lack of serological or epidemiological evidence showing transmission from animals to humans, among others outlined in this report,” the report states.

“As a result of these evidentiary gaps, it is hard to treat the natural zoonotic spillover theory as the presumptive origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

…

“Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy.”

Here’s what makes this so interesting in the present context. Larry Johnson has a post today titled: IS THE COVID VACCINE KILLING PEOPLE? It’s difficult to read this post and not wonder whether the Covid virus was developed specifically as a test bed for the new vaccine platform. That’s speculation, but it does fit with both Malone’s reference to a problem that we created for ourselves as well as with some of the reckless experimentation that has been going on in bio-labs run by the US for many years.

Anyway, have a look at Malone’s full presentation. It’s really important.