Robert Malone Goes There: Is There A Depopulation/Covid Regime Link?

Those who have followed Dr. Robert Malone’s writing since the Covid Regime began will be aware that he has longstanding links to the Deep State. He’s come a long way. Having been involved in the development of mRNA technology long ago, his original focus was on the science behind the mRNA injections that were pushed—hard—on unsuspecting populations. From there his interest expanded to the overall Covid Regime, including related public health measures beyond the injections, and then soon turned his attention to the web of corporate, government, and non-government institutions that were behind the Covid Regime in all its aspects. He makes no secret that he believes that the World Economic Forum (WEF) and associated globalist/transhumanist orientated foundations (think Bill Gates, for starters, but there are more) have played essential roles in this effort to enforce a Global Reset to control the human race.

Most recently Malone has begun talking about the population issue that may be behind it all. Most, if not all, of the major globalist actors are heavily invested—ideologically and financially—in the population control project. This represents a big step for Malone. He has freely admitted that he grew up a liberal, indoctrinated in the ZPG ideology. In his latest substack he takes a very deep dive into the connections between the depopulation movement and the US Government—I take it for granted that the USG is not alone in this—and comes up with some eye opening results.

Now, right up front Malone admits that these are things he can’t strictly prove—”correlation is not causation.” There is tantalizing documentation for his suspicions, but no smoking gun documentation. What we’re talking about here are “parallels between some of the proposed and implemented COVID crisis policy positions” and official—but long classified—USG policy dating back to the mid 70s and the Nixon and Ford administrations. That’s a long time ago, but the policies adopted back then are still USG policy. Interestingly, at least one major figure in developing those policies is still alive and active: Henry Kissinger.

To get the full scope of this you’ll need to read the entire substack, but what I’ll excerpt here provides the general outline:

Population Control: The Receipts

Personally, I have been reluctant to wander down the rabbit hole relating to various “depopulation agenda” theories involving the COVID crisis. However, the odd concordance between a possible population reduction objective and the dysfunctional “public health” policies is obvious to all open-minded thinkers. These policies include that the biologically engineered SARS-CoV-2 virus, the many “public health” policies, as well as the rushed gene therapy-based COVID “vaccines” and their wide range of associated – but rigorously denied – “serious adverse events” (not the least of which are sudden unexpected death and fertility issues) are more consistent with a population control/depopulation agenda as opposed to being effective “public health” interventions. 

Buckle up, because this is going to be a deep dive down that very same rabbit hole.

Recently, a respected colleague (Mr. Gavin DeBecker) sent me an email comprising a lengthy analysis and attached documents concerning (formerly classified) National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200 titled the “Kissinger Report”. He also provided links to associated supplemental federal government documents including the National Security Directive Memorandum 314 “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests, 11/26/75.” ...

In considering these documents, it is helpful to keep in mind that Henry Kissinger is a key mentor of Dr. Klaus Schwab, was involved (together with the CIA) in originally creating and continues to consult with the World Economic Forum as well as with the CCP/Xi Jinping.

Reading through the comments, observations, and associated documents I was stunned by the frank, “Realpolitik”-based arguments in favor of a US Federal Government global population control/depopulation agenda, as well as the similarities to various activities known to have been performed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, World Health Organization, United Nations and other non-governmental (and governmental) organizations. I am also amazed by the parallels between some of the proposed and implemented COVID crisis policy positions (keeping in mind that NSSM 200 as well as NSDM 314 were formally implemented as US federal policy by Gerald Ford and remain in place as US policy to this day).

It is absolutely true that correlation does not prove causation, and we do not (yet?) have documentation that these official population control/depopulation policy items influenced COVID crisis public health policy – as many so-called “conspiracy theorists” have surmised. However, as far as I am concerned, one must recognize and acknowledge the amazing parallels between preceding population policy and many of the “public health” policies and actions which were implemented in the US and most Western countries (particularly the “Five Eyes” nations). …

I edited Malone’s observation, with which I do agree, that it has always been likely that the Covid Regime policies for population control were always driven by multiple agendas.

After reading this essay and the supporting documentation, I suggest that each reader should make his/her (they/them?) assessment of the probability that the response to this “public health crisis” was influenced by US Federal population control policy as clearly outlined in the “Kissinger Report.” The report indicates that global population MUST not exceed 8 billion human beings. Is it a coincidence that in 2020 total global human inhabitants reached 7.84 billion?

It all started with a meeting.

…

Kissinger Report and Subsequent US Population Control Policy

The classified National Security Study Memo known as The Kissinger Report, undertaken at the direction of President Nixon, laid out detailed plans for population reduction in many countries.  These plans became official US policy in 1975 though National Security Decision 314, enacted by President Gerald Ford.

The policies developed from the report were seen as a way the United States could use human population control to prevent undeveloped nations from gaining substantial political power.  Believing that future generations birthed throughout the world posed a danger to wealth accumulation, the policy was backed by wealthy individuals in the US. The policy was also expected to protect American businesses abroad against interference from nations seeking to support their growing populations.

Historically, war was required to reduce an adversary’s population; the Kissinger Report proposed a more strategic and well-disguised approach aimed at countries that could pose long-term risk to US economic and military interests.

From Wikipedia: “NSSM200 was reworked and adopted as official United States policy through NSDM 314 by President Gerald Ford on November 26, 1975. It was initially classified for over a decade but was obtained by researchers in the early 1990s. The memorandum and subsequent policies developed from the report were observed as a way the United States could use human population reduction to limit the political power of undeveloped nations, ensure the easy extraction of foreign natural resources, prevent young anti-establishment individuals from being born, and to protect American businesses abroad from interference from nations seeking to support their growing populations.”

From the Kissinger Report Executive Summary:

World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:

(a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and

(b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more

This major objective –to not exceed 8 billion– combined with the fact that we hit the 8-billion mark in 2022 might help explain the intense urgency of so many planned and organized actions during the past three years.

When we set aside Covid/virus/pandemic (the ostensible rationale for everything that’s been done since 2020), and focus instead on plans that were developed and enacted by USG over decades, and when we focus on actions that have been taken on those plans, and when we focus on the effects that have been caused by those actions, it emerges that population reduction, population control (and control of the population) has resulted.  This is expressed without judgment about good or bad motives, and without reference to specific people – simply looking at what has resulted.

Perhaps the most obvious result of COVID lockdowns and the interruption of commerce is the current record number of people at risk of starvation: Before COVID lockdowns and all their results, the number of people at risk of starvation was 135 million.  By the end of 2021, that had increased by another 135 million people, and in 2022, it then increased another 67 million.  The result is currently about 10 million deaths from starvation, 3 million of them children.

So there you have Malone’s thoughts on the subject. Essentially he’s arguing that the Covid Regime’s policies—which flew in the face of sound science on multiple levels, and required fraudulent methods to hide that fact—appears to have accomplished some of what the depopulation freaks have been advancing as US policy for many decades. And the two projects share some common leading personages. It does raise questions.

---

Speaking of conspiracy theories, I can’t help but be interested in the death of Obama’s chef/friend. Has anyone else noticed some odd facts? I suppose the logical stricture that correlation doesn’t equal causation applies here, as well.