Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Crawford's avatar

Soon enough the discussion will turn to "which does the Regime think is more damaging - 1) letting Durham run, 2) shutting him down, or 3) kneecapping him by limiting the additional critical evidence that goes public and letting the targets and the indicted know that the Regime DOJ will carry out any prosecutions in ways that strongly favor acquittals and/or just shielding the malfeasors by any of various backroom machinations available to a DOJ and a regime this corrupt?"

My early bet's on some form or another of the kneecap route, but since I'm utterly unqualified to speculate on just how doable or not this might be, maybe others in the know could comment as to whether the Regime DOJ has it in its power to carry out such a kneecap operation, including but not limited to effectively gagging Durham and appointing hack prosecutors who understand the game is to manufacture failed prosecutions.

Regardless, I'll at least enjoy the ride while it lasts. In these dark times, every little bit that gets exposed to the public is a great big plus. And if a good chunk of the story gets put together and made public, then even if things beyond that do get kneecapped, that will be a lot more material to work with than what we in the corruption-hating sector of the voting public have currently.

Expand full comment
Yancey Ward's avatar

I have long believed the computer forensic evidence supporting the narrative was fabricated right from the start. I think these people, at first, didn't expect Trump to win in 2016, so weren't all that worried about breaking the law.

Expand full comment
48 more comments...

No posts