There was intriguing news yesterday. Not only has Alex Berenson’s case against Twitter made it past the motion to dismiss, but the federal judge handling the case has demanded “expedited and broad discovery”.
In case you’ve forgotten, here’s the tweet that got Berenson banned (h/t TGP):
Now, here’s what’s intriguing about the case. Again via TGP I’ve pasted in two of the questions Berenson will be asking in discovery. As you’ll be able to tell at a glance:
These questions are pretty obviously designed to find out if the government was involved in the banning. Sure, they may flush out other actors, but any government involvement would be the big bombshell.
These questions are very simple—easy to answer, no complicated searches, no voluminous documentation. Easy peasy. Expedited? Should be no problemo.
The discovery in this case—and Elon Musk is in charge of Twitter now, so he shouldn’t actually have a dog in this fight—could pull back the curtain on both the Covid Regime as well as the Censorship Regime. That could be big. Hey—ya gotta have hope.
Since we’re talking about Covid and Disinformation and hope … as I remarked the other day, and try to do at relatively regular intervals, Information is steadily trickling out. Anecdotally, people are picking up on certain things. And people are continuing to dig into the stats that are available. They’re coming up with the kind of stuff that governments want to keep off Twitter. This is one reason why Berenson’s case could prove to be very important:
Remember, just a week or two ago, Obama made that remark—I don’t recall whether he was laughing when he said it or not—about the injections, that the mass injection campaign took the place of the clinical trials that never happened. Very funny.
From the article itself:
Conclusions
COVID19 vaccination can elicit a distinct T cell-dominant immune-mediated hepatitis with a unique pathomechanism associated with vaccination induced antigen-specific tissue-resident immunity requiring systemic immunosuppression.
Lay summary
Liver inflammation is observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection but can also occur in some individuals after vaccination and shares some typical features with autoimmune liver disease. In this report, we show that highly activated T cells accumulate and are evenly distributed in the different areas of the liver in a patient with liver inflammation following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Moreover, within these liver infiltrating T cells, we observed an enrichment of T cells that are reactive to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that these vaccine-induced cells can contribute to the liver inflammation in this context.
Now this next is interesting, because it’s not the first time that a mass injection campaign has led to “unexpected” results—a bit like economic stats, the bad results are always “unexpected”. The difference is that these results are happening, like, right here—not in Africa, not in other far off countries. But there was reason for caution in general. There really was a reason why vaccines take so long to get approved—until now.
And that leads to the “anti-vaxxer” angle. “Anti-vaxxer” is an epithet that gets you canceled. It’s a “but” word, meaning, you have to append a “but” to it: “I’m not an anti-vaxxer, but …” Which implicitly means you’re censoring yourself to some meaningful degree.
Consider this—I did do a bit of fact checking:
India Supreme court and vax mandates no longer valid.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/no-individual-can-be-forced-to-undergo-covid-19-vaccination-says-sc/articleshow/91251740.cms
"Governments did not place any data to prove that unvaccinated person spreads virus more than vaccinated person and people who have not taken vaccines should not be barred from accessing public place"
How about this . . . But, I am an anti-vaxxer and a pony paste aficionado too!