New Signs Of The Covid Regime Exit Strategy?
Looks like Rochelle at CDC is floating more trial balloons. This got a lot of publicity, and hopefully the SCOTUS is paying attention:
AT LEAST, four comorbidities.
Next question:
Seems like a pretty obvious strategy—deflate the numbers and declare victory:
The only explanation for this that I can think of is strongly negative polling for the Zhou regime on this specific issue, which had previously been considered one of—perhaps the only—the bright spots so far far the regime
And while we’re on the topic of transparency …
Kingmaker asks a very relevant question, which should be on the mind of every SCOTUS justice with a sense of integrity—Prelogar was the Solicitor General arguing the case for the Zhou regime:
Failure to make this very obvious correction should have drawn a sharp rebuke. After all, SG Prelogar should be deeply immersed in all the facts of the cases and the background to them, in preparation for oral argument. That this deceitful behaviour called for a rebuke seems especially the case when, as Jonathan Turley notes, the entire government case was publicly predicated on deceit:
… the Supreme Court is grappling with an executive move [an “ultimate workaround”] that was openly discussed not only as an avoidance of Congress but a circumvention of constitutional limitations.
It was not a good sign for the administration that the most referenced individual during oral argument was Biden’s chief of staff, Ron Klain, who tweeted that the mandates were “workarounds” of the Constitution. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Neil Gorsuch, and others referred to Klain’s admission as the administration’s lawyers tried to argue that the executive had the constitutional authority to implement a national mandate.
One would think that seeming complicity between the regime’s DoJ—in the person of SG Prelogar—and three justices to gaslight the public during oral arguments would anger the other justices. Perhaps these matters will be raised in the decision?
Rochelle's admission should rightly blow up the "silent deadly killer" myth and with it the underpinnings of the fear porn. I'm curious to see the totalitarian wheels keep turning, once people by and large lose their fear.
My starting point is that the covid hype is a global effort and that there's way too much to lose for those behind the effort if they go down any road that results in relative calm.
Too much truth, lethal to the cause, would manage to get out in such an atmosphere, so the chaos and the madness will not be allowed to let up, or at least that's my sad prediction.
With omicron looking to be disappointingly less deadly from the Democrats’ perspective, they certainly are in a pickle: the chaos must be maintained to keep people’s attention away from the near-perfect success and zero side effects of cheap, safe, proven early treatments and prevention, as broad public discovery of these would make it clear that every last little bit of this “crisis” was actively brought upon the world by a ruling class that knew full well almost all along exactly how easily preventable and treatable this virus is. Yet most Americans have had it with the chaos and yearn for its end. But I see no path for the Biden Admin other than keeping things crazy, even if some adjustments are grudgingly made in covid strategy, and continuing to blame the chaos on those of us who see through the lies and act accordingly. IOW: the more things may seem to change, the more they’ll actually stay the same. And I’ll be shocked if more shoes don’t drop between now and election time, just like they've been dropping one after the other ever since round about election season 2016.
The manufactured crises of the arsonist-firefighter ploy is all they know, and it serves them well. They need for us to forever “live in interesting times,” and they’ll not let up on that. So whatever we end up getting out of any Admin strategy shifts, the chaos and the scapegoating will continue to reign, by design. The supreme cause of a scared, confused, angry and benighted public depends on it. Hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think so.