Who thinks the Russians are somehow unaware of this reality? Putin has made no bones about this. But now the Western public is being treated to this knowledge from its own ruling class:
-- GEROMAN -- time will tell - -- @GeromanAT
me: there are NATO soldiers in Ukraine
NATO shills: no that is Russian propaganda Scholz:
Here’s question. Would you, if you were a “leader” of a Western country, be helping Ukraine fire missiles into Russia if this is your actual defense status?
-- GEROMAN -- time will tell - -- reposted
LMAO: Royal NAVY may has to sell an aircraft carrier? The British navy continues to take Ls.
Humorously, Germany’s Scholz said Germany isn’t at war with Russia and won’t send missiles to Ukraine because they would need to be operated by German soldiers—and that would mean war. Then:
RT BOSS SCOLDS #SCHOLZ: Margarita Simonyan says she is in possession of a recording in which German officers discuss blowing up #CrimeanBridge.
This comes after #German Chancellor Scholz vows that #Germany is not party to the conflict.
0:07
Listen to the Bundeswehr officers here. Apparently one of them was in a hotel in Singapore. As if the Russians couldn’t pick his conversation up.
All this is very awkward for the West at this juncture. Russia will be inclined to drive a very hard bargain when bargain time comes—as it will. So what’s the response? Double down. Sounds like the definition of insanity:
Ukraine has no satelite capacity, no long-range weapons, no high altitude recon capabilities, and no expertise in the operation of any of the above. Absolutely Zero. Imagine if this headline was reversed?
"Russian military chief helped destroy British War Ships?"
Mikael Valtersson provides a nice summary of the peace deal that Ukraine could have had—but for the West’s insistence on war with Russia.
Meanwhile, in the real world, there’s open talk of a Ukrainian “collapse” by summer:
Re the NYT article about CIA and MI6 activity in Ukraine over the years/decades, Larry Johnson's article is well worth reading:
https://sonar21.com/ny-times-plays-cia-messenger-turn-off-the-lights-the-party-is-over/
Here's the long and short of it:
"The goal of the Entous/Schwirtz article is simple — portray the CIA as a great organization who did magnificent work in Ukraine but were not able to complete the mission of destroying Russia because the Republican Congress failed to provide funding and the Ukrainian intelligence service was uncontrollable."
IOW CIA CYA
In order to build back better, what exists must first be eradicated. I cannot believe how quickly the globalists are destroying everything.