mRNA Roundup: Pure Bloods In Demand, Geopolitics
Yesterday I did a brief post regarding the very real possibility that infection with mRNA toxins (Spike Protein) could be contagious, or (more properly speaking) transmissible by physical contact. I cited this video interview with Dr. Peter McCullough:
You can find more on this development:
Dr. McCullough: mRNA from COVID vax transfers from jabbed to unjabbed, ‘changing human genome’
‘It's conceivable that two vaccinated people could actually pass the code for Pfizer or Moderna into their baby, permanently,’ the renowned epidemiologist said.
What I’m wondering is whether this plays into—logically, it certainly does—what we’ve discussed in comments: the low key but visible demand for pure blood. Blood donations from Pure Bloods who have not been injected with mRNA toxins that could be transferred via blood transfusions. Naturally the requests are framed in as neutral sounding a way as possible. I’ve seen at least one such request. I forget where I saw it, but it wasn’t some fringe thing. I also experienced a pre-donor interview in which I was asked—for the first time in nearly 50 donations—whether I’d had an mRNA injection (“the Covid vaccine”).
Yesterday the following related comment appeared at Wirepoints. As you’ll see, this is happening:
Rick
11 hours ago
I need to donate blood once a month, by prescription, because I have thick blood, a potassium condition. It’s an elegant drug-free way to treat my condition. A few years ago I noticed that the place I go to told me they were anxious to receive my unvaxxed blood, strange, I thought. I even received some marketing texts to come in and donate again. Well it turns out there is growing demand for unvaxxed blood. I wish I had the resources and youth to invest in an unvaxxed blood franchise in the USA, this will be big, mark my words. Anyone young enough and looking for a business with a huge long term upside demand for what will be an increasing-value commodity, might want to consider…
International Blood Bank for the Unvaccinated has been Formed with Members from at Least 16 countries – Demand for “Pure Blood” Skyrockets (thegatewaypundit.com)
Something to keep in mind.
Now, on to geopolitics.
I’ve just started listening to a podcast featuring Tom Luongo and Alex Krainer. The entire episode is about an hour and a half in length and I’ve only listened to the first 16 minutes or so. The host, Shaun Newman, starts by raising the topic of “Zero Covid”. In other words, what is going on with China and its strange lockdowns?
Krainer starts it out, and immediately states that, whatever else is going on with China, the “Zero Covid” policy has nothing to do with Covid. As Krainer says, whatever else you may say about the Chinese, they’re not stupid. They know the score. Krainer admits he’s not sure what’s up with China, but …
The situation is different with regard to Russia. Krainer’s runs like this.
The Covid Regime was/is a hoax that was perpetrated for the purpose of injecting the entire population of the world with “medications” that would form the basis for controlling the world population—travel, daily life, employment, access to just about anything. This would be the start of the Great Reset. It would be run, largely, through mRNA injections produced by Pfizer and Moderna (Astrazeneca and J&J are essentially in the same lineup). But Russia came out with their own traditional style “vaccine”, Sputnik V, which blew up the whole Great Reset scheme because Russia offered this non-mRNA shot to the whole world. In other words, this was really about geopolitics, and Russia was throwing a spanner into the Great Reset. Of course, Russia had to play along with the notion that the Covid Hoax wasn’t really a hoax, otherwise they would have had no basis for offering Sputnik V. By playing along with the hoax, they avoided the need to explain it to the world.
Luongo jumps in to offer his view of what’s going on in China. You’ve probably seen versions of this theory already. Luongo agrees that the Chinese lockdowns have nothing actually to do with Covid. What China is doing is supporting Russia by inflicting counter sanctions on the US—especially in the field of pharmaceuticals, which the US has basically entirely outsourced.
The US sanctions on chips is largely about advanced military applications. Within three years Taiwan Semiconductor will be up and running in Texas, and China will be largely shut out. China is using the lockdowns to retaliate, rotating the lockdowns to various sectors but with an emphasis on pharmaceuticals—resulting in major shortages in the US. The lockdowns also serve the purpose of social control because the Chinese economy is going through a rough stretch.
So far—a quarter hour in—it’s a fascinating discussion, which I highly recommend.
Not Covid or mRNA related, but geopolitical—and touching on a topic we recently discussed …
Ted Snider has a lengthy roundup on the fissures opening in the anti-Russian collective West:
You may or may not find these cracks to be unexpected, but it’s a good discussion. Snider focuses on three areas: US v. Ukraine, US v. Europe, and Europe v. Europe (which mostly comes down to Poland v. Europe). Here’s one key paragraph, to give a flavor:
US led sanctions have deprived Europe of the Russian oil they depend on. That has left Europe optionless, save for asking the US for gas. But the US is charging its European customers four times what it is charging Americans. French President Emmanuel Macron called the gouging “not friendly.” Germany’s economy minister has implored the US to start showing “solidarity” by reducing the cost of badly needed gas.
And the crack is real. “America needs to realize,” a senior EU official said, “that public opinion is shifting in many EU countries.” He was referring both to Europe’s role in the war and its relationship with the US. Josep Borrell, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the EU, reportedly amplified the call for the US to respond to the charges, saying “Americans — our friends — take decisions which have an economic impact on us.”
Of course there are two sides. Shipping LNG from the US to Europe is bound to cost much more than sending gas through pipelines within the US. That was the whole point of Europe buying pipeline gas from Russia. The Euros cut their own throats because the US asked them to—and because they thought they would end up profiting. Sorry. Now the Euros want to be subsidized by the US for their gas needs, but the US is saying, No. After all, the US claims to be protecting the Euros against Russia, which is the public position that the Euros still maintain. But the natives are getting restless as temperatures drop and economies collapse.
From a reader:
https://hatchardreport.com/unfounded-prejudice-is-gripping-the-nation-misleading-government-publicity-is-to-blame/
Here are two sincere parents who have already been traumatised by the heart condition of their four month old which necessitates an operation. They would like unvaccinated blood to be used, and they arranged for matching donors.
But the surgeon and the New Zealand health system have refused this easy option. Instead, they decided to go for the jugular. They are seeking custody of the child to enforce the use of blood from the public blood bank. They are refusing to admit that studies finding persistence of spike protein indicate any risk. An extreme position. It is of note, as we have previously written that even pro-vaccine advocates overseas are admitting the existence of novel blood clots, (whilst arguing implausibly that their causes are unknown).
For two years now, vaccine advocates have been asking for separation between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Expressing a deep (yet unfounded) fear of the unvaccinated. Even seeking to avoid breathing the same air. This has been encouraged by government publicity. Now they want the unvaccinated to exclusively and compulsorily receive vaccinated blood transfusions.
Both national dailies have decided to demonise the parents, abandoning all semblance of humane compassion. There can’t be any greater condemnation of the effect of vaccination. Apparently, it makes people angry and uncaring.
...
I know that I shouldn’t be using logic and common sense to analyze developing situations, but if the “vaccines” were all that and a bag of chips, aaaa errr aaa, why would you even want to go near unvaccinated blood? After all, it was us unvaccinated who were the scourge of the earth, a despicable lot who only cared about themselves and represented a monstrous life threatening menace to the “vaxxed”. Just asking.
Regarding the the utter debacle with Russia and Ukraine, I am truly ashamed of how the US is acting in this affair. We couldn’t look more self-serving and hypocritical if we tried. And now that the Europeans
are noticing that this whole thing doesn’t pass the smell test, I suspect that, you’ll excuse the expression, Americans chickens will come home to roost in a most unflattering manner.
But, we do have a complete and utter buffoon in the White House, so at least we’ve got that going for us.
In passing, I noticed that I’m not the only one who is wondering what the hell happened to the Robert’s Court leak investigation, The Hill posted a story today wondering the same thing. I’ll bet they thought us bumpkins in flyover country had forgotten all about it.