Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lawrence L.'s avatar

Is anybody else getting a little tired of the "correlation doesn't mean causation" trope? Every 'fact checker' that hides behind that smoke screen needs to get the complete literature on the Bradford-Hill Criteria shoved up their lazy ignorant arses:

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-bradford-hill-criteria

The greater the number of criteria met and the stronger the signals, the more likely that causation is indeed established. At the very least, Team Coincidence has a lot of work to do the explain away each criterion. You'd think these morons were getting paid to be ignorant. Oh, wait...

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts