A lot of “smart” people ridiculed Devin Nunes’ lawsuit, but he keeps winning.

TLDR: Republishing/retweeting/relinking an article might qualify as actual malice even if the original publication was not deemed to be actual malice for the purposes of defamation, i.e. the act of republishing/retweeting/relinking is the malicious act.
cc @SergeiMillian

Josh Gerstein @joshgerstein
The issue of actual malice will end up in front of a jury in the 8th Circuit. In case you’re wondering where in the world the 8th Circuit lives:
And a bonus tweet from Hans:

The Science™ is now reduced to "rule of thumb".

President Biden @POTUS
Because Dems don’t actually give a sh*t about “science”. It’s just a talking point.
My general rule of thumb is to ignore proven liars.
That's not the half of it. The murderer Fauci says we can't afford to consider the Boosters a "luxury" anymore and I was wondering if that was an epidemiological term of art or if he was just translating the epidemiological principles into layman's terms for us rubes. I'm still trying to find out more about where we are on the pandemic timeline when we can't afford luxury doses of treatment. I mean are we at the "round up the abstainers from luxury" stage then, like they are in Australia? I know they are probably a couple months ahead of us, you know epidemiologically speaking .