In The News: Mandates, "Vaccines"

Let’s start with “vaccines”, and I use the quote marks for good reason.

Techno Fog has a fascinating post up that illustrates that “vaccine” is just a word. It means one thing to the average person who thinks of, say, smallpox. On the other hand, the CDC is prepared to be flexible about what the word means or doesn’t mean when the need arises. What need, you ask? Well, the need of Big Pharma to make Big Money.

See, if people think “vaccine” means something that will make you immune to a disease, and you won’t pass it on, then you’ll be open to the idea of getting shot up with even an experimental injection if you think you’re at serious risk. Even a normally savvy guy like Don Surber repeatedly—and seriously—makes statements indicating that he thinks that’s what these injections actually accomplish. Of course, Rochelle—who runs CDC, knows better and has actually admitted: The injections don’t stop you from being infected and don’t stop you from giving the disease to others.

Well, if people actually understand that, and also understand the risks, then what would be the point of being shot up with this stuff? But then Big Pharma wouldn’t make Big Money.

With that in mind, and knowing that CDC had—in September, 2021—changed the definition of “vaccine,” Techno Fog did a smart thing. He filed a FOIA request to obtain the emails documenting what people at CDC were saying when they considered “redefining” “vaccine”:

CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is "Problematic"

CDC: Problematic Vaccine? No, Problematic Definition of Vaccine.

And he came up with some revealing stuff.

CDC knew they had a problem. The problem was “right wing covid-19 pandemic deniers”. That’s a technical medical term. Here’s how that problem manifested itself:

If the only thing CDC wanted to do was to be “more accurate” in speaking of “vaccines”, why not just make a public announcement and broadcast it through the usual compliant media: Hey, public! We thought we should let you know, these injections aren’t really “vaccines” in the sense that you think of “vaccines”. These are just experimental genetic medications that may or may not help you and may or may not kill you or injure you for life. And they won’t stop you from being infected or from infecting others. But go ahead and try ‘em if you want to.

There would be advantages to an honest approach like that, but also disadvantages:

Advantage: You’d be being honest, and virtue is it’s own reward.

Advantage: People deciding to get shot up would be doing so under something resembling “informed consent.” Rather than, like, under false pretenses.

Disadvantage: “Right wing covid-19 pandemic deniers” would claim that they’d been right all along. An unthinkable outcome.

Disadvantage: People might not get themselves injected and then Big Pharma wouldn’t make Big Money. Wow! Lots of influential people would then be unhappy. And what about the boosters for ever and ever?

And so Techno Fog concludes:

There you have it. Affirmative action for the multinational corporations. Why have them improve their vaccines when you can just change the definition of vaccine to fit their ineffective vaccines?

Congrats to all the skeptics out there – you raised enough concerns that the CDC went and tried to change reality.

Follow the link for the details.

Now, news on the mandate. Zerohedge has it:

Millions Of Federal Contractors Get More Flexibility Over Vaxx Mandate Enforcement, White House Waffles

Follow the link for details. I think the news is that significant contractors are very unhappy about the mandate and are exerting pressure. As a result the regime is … waffling. They’re saying the contractors don’t have to fire people right away—they can give them counseling.

Here’s what I mean by “significant contractors”: “Boeing, Lockheed Martin, United Airlines, IBM, UPS, and many more.” Those are people who can cause a regime to waffle.

What does this really mean? Hard to say. However, I suspect this will embolden resisters. Including the 10 Republican states that have filed suit.