Here’s another way to put that question. What kind of people would rush a ‘vaccine’ to market (via EUA) and push it to ever broader swathes of the populace, knowing this, but not doing long term studies of the effects?
I say the responsible parties know this, because studies like this one put them on notice:
Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses
The research actually does more than “suggest” this—it states it as a fact. This is a pre-print, so it’s not peer reviewed. It also dates from May, so when Robert Malone recommends it to your attention I assume that the issue has not been addressed.
The conclusion leaves things up in the air a bit, as far as harm or benefit goes. The point is, the trials that would resolve this issue appear not to have been done. Which is not surprising when we learn things like this:
Anyway …
Researchers in The Netherlands and Germany have warned that Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses that should be considered in the development and use of mRNA-based vaccines.
Jorge Domínguez-Andrés and colleagues say that while the vaccine has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and subsequent COVID-19, little is known about the broad effects the vaccine may have on the innate and adaptive immune responses.
In the current study (not peer-reviewed*), the research team … confirmed the efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccination at inducing effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants.
However, they also showed that the vaccine altered the production of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells following stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and non-specific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli.
Following vaccination, innate immune cells had a reduced response to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), TLR7 and TLR8 – all ligands that play an important role in the immune response to viral infection.
Neta and colleagues also found that cytokine responses to fungi were increased following vaccination.
The mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines,” writes the team.
A pre-print version of the research paper is available on the medRxiv* server. A preprint is a version of a scholarly or scientific paper that precedes formal peer review and publication in a peer-reviewed scholarly or scientific journal.
…
What do the authors advise?
The researchers say that in combination with strong adaptive immune responses, the reprogramming of innate responses could either contribute to a more balanced inflammatory reaction to SARS-CoV-2 infection or a weakened innate immune response.
The effect of the BNT162b2 vaccination on innate immune responses could also interfere with the responses to other vaccinations, adds the team.
Our findings need to be confirmed by conducting larger cohort-studies with populations with diverse backgrounds, while further studies should examine the potential interactions between BNT162b2 and other vaccines,” concludes Domínguez-Andrés and colleagues.
Let’s see. I think before deploying a ‘vaccine’ you’d normally want to know which alternative it contributes to: a more balanced inflammatory reaction to the infection or a weakened innate immune response. Inquiring minds and all that. But no.
Denninger today, in "Down To Only One Question Now..", showing "Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status between week 36 and week 39 2021", from the UK Health Security Agency:
< Unfortunately what this means is that now, for anyone over 30, you are more likely to *get infected*, yes, adjusted for the population that is vaccinated, if you *are vaccinated*.
Indeed in the 40-49 age group, you're close to double as probable, on a per-population basis....
*So far* this is not translating into higher risk of Covid hospitalization and death, on a per-100,000 basis. But, that the vaccine makes you more likely to both get and give *to others* the virus, is now established. It is fact. It is in fact true, for everyone who is *over 30*.
I have pointed out, that preventing infection was never in the cards; it was not part of the EUA, it was not part of the studies, it was never demonstrated. But this is much worse, because now we are talking about a direct *threat to others*....
But the 900lb Gorilla is, that the impairment may not (be?) Covid-19 specific. In other words, the impairment may be *immune system generalized*, in which case those who took the jabs are screwed, because that immune damage could be long-*lasting or even permanent*, yet the protection against serious outcomes is specific to Covid.
So yes, you're "safer" against a serious outcome, even while screwing everyone else, but at the same time you are wildly *more-susceptible* to a severe or fatal outcome due to, for example, *influenza*.
We don't have any data on that yet, and thus there's no way to know if that is the case. It is, however, a reasonable possibility, and the few anecdotal pieces of data from people who have run immune screens following the jabs, suggests it may indeed be the case...." >
Two questions:
1. Since the positive effects of the vaccine wear off after 4 months or so, does this reprogramming also?
2. If you are vaccinated, and get delta, are you now immune to Covid?
Hopefully these will get answered soon.