Why would the Anglo-Zionists think it’s a smart thing to threaten every major power in the world? They just don’t seem to get the concept of diplomacy. In an interview earlier this year John Mearsheimer confessed to being nonplussed at this approach. Try telling that to our foreign policy establishment:
Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand
I'm sure this will go down well in India... https://x.com/sidhant/status/sidhant/status/1811459524198564318/video/1…
Their US ambassador, Eric Garcetti, is literally saying they can't remain autonomous: "I know that India likes its strategic autonomy but in times of conflict there is no such thing as strategic autonomy".
He goes on: "We will need to know that we are trusted friends, brothers and sisters, colleagues that in times of need - on the next day - will be acting together. They will know each others' equipment, they will know each others' training, they will know each others' systems."
He also heavily implies he expects India to fight with the US in the East China Sea and Taiwan, saying that during joint US-India military exercises they "focused on humanitarian emergency but the lessons learned go beyond humanitarian emergencies to those moments we all pray will never happen whether they're on your northern border, whether they're in the East China Sea, whether they're in the strait of Taiwan."
The US used to tell all those things to China just a few decades ago, when they needed it to counter the Soviet Union... And now that China has grown they want to use India to counter it, and will undoubtedly try to contain India if and when it also becomes too big...
I suspect that India is ultimately wise enough to see through it and will understand that this is ultimately all done for the purpose of denying the advent of the Asian century and prolonging a US-dominated world order at the expense of multipolarity... which of course isn't in India's best interests: they benefit from a prosperous region and a world that isn't "America first".
1:28 / 3:37
From
Sidhant Sibal
12:09 PM · Jul 12, 2024
"We will need to know that *we* are trusted friends, brothers and sisters, colleagues that in times of need - on the next day - will be acting together" Is a slimy way of saying we require "you* to behave like any other of our military vassal/allies. To which:
Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand 
As predicted, not well received at all in India , understandably...
Quote
Stanly Johny @johnstanly
This is the language of overlords, not of partners.
During conflict, there is no such thing as strategic autonomy: U.S. Ambassador https://thehindu.com/news/national/during-conflict-there-is-no-such-thing-as-strategic-autonomy-us-ambassador/article68393961.ece
Long interesting guest article at Larry Johnson’s blog:
Long interesting vido:
Modi is in a similar situation to Erdogan: time to decide whose side he is on.
Working with Indians and knowing their views on British colonialism, having a Westerner telling them what to do will ruffle the feathers.