UPDATED: Election Fraud Investigations Continue
We're all looking forward to see the results of the audit from Arizona soon, but already more and more irregularities in the handling procedures and in the access authorities are being revealed. Dem and, yes, GOPe stonewalling continues at a high legal level--local authorities are defying state senate subpoenas, even though state legislatures--under the US Constitution and most state laws--are in charge of elections. Some of these issues are finding their way to the SCOTUS. There's plenty of time for these matters to be resolved--or, if not resolved, then aired--before Election 2022.
As I've said previously, I simply don't have time to cover all the ins and outs of these investigations. As a result I'm waiting for more details on a broader scale than are currently available. We know that there are ongoing investigations with regard to GA, MI, and WI. I'm not sure what the situation is with regard to PA, but I believe there is action there, too.
I notice that my last reference to these matters at any length was all the way back at the beginning of February: BRIEFLY NOTED: Matt Braynard Is Still On The Case . In that post I noted Braynard's continuing outstanding efforts to document and expose widespread fraud. At that time I quoted Braynard from an appearance he made on Steve Bannon's show--and I don't believe anything has happened to change his assessment:
What I’m finding and continuing to find, because we’re actually still doing research, and we’re looking forward to presenting it more aggressively without the constraints of the lawsuits we were entangled with initially, is that among those three states, the number of illegal ballots surpassed the margin of victory. Georgia, Wisconsin, and Arizona, without those three, Joe Biden isn’t president – and I think we can prove that fairly conclusively.
Last night and this morning TGP had several posts which illustrate what Braynard was talking about as recently as two months ago (he's been on the case for far longer). Braynard, in his conversation with Bannon, focused strongly on Wisconsin, and since then there have been continuing revelations of collusion between local Dem elected officials and national Dem operatives--often circumventing local election officials. The first TGP report delves into more of that. It's now being documented that the scope of these operations was quite widespread:
TGP quotes documentation that shows that outside Dem operatives were being given extraordinary--and unauthorized--access to voting information. That information would logically have only one purpose: a massive ballot harvesting operation. Much of this activity was being funded by multi-million dollar grants from Mark Zuckerberg.
Meanwhile, in MI the legal wrangling continues. TGP covers developments here:
To show what TGP is talking about, I'll quote from the Deperno filing (linked by TGP)--which is an eye opener, but hardly surprising. The real point, of course, is that if what is described was going on in Antrim County, a heavily GOP county, one can hardly imagine the scale of these shenanigans in the major metro countries. I'm not able to copy and paste from that PDF file, so I'll type it in with a summary from the table on p. 9:
We can clearly see in each of these graphs that there is a near perfect turnout consistently between the ages of 65 to 80:
[Graph showing voting data for the 15 townships of Antrim County. The graph shows:
total ballots cast (14,901) and the number that were
sent to PO Boxes (3,019--20.3%)]
One may wonder what is causing a near 100% turnout in these age groups. We believe it directly correlates to the fact that 20.3% of all ballots in Antrim County were sent to PO Boxes as demonstrated in the chart above. As we see in the charts below, there were 15,962 ballots present at the hand recount on December 17, 2020.
[charts]
However in the chart above ... (showing 20.3% of ballots sent to PO Boxes), we see that there are only 14,901 ballots in Defendants Benson's official database (i.e., only 14,901 people actually voted). This means that of the actual 15,962 ballots counted in December, there [are] 1,061 that are not in the database, meaning they do not exist on the voter rolls, meaning they are most likely phantom ballots. Where did they come from? The actual ballots must be audited.
It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate from this data to a statewide level, and to then apply such extrapolations to other swing states, based on data that has been gathered. The conclusion of massive fraud is inescapable--so it seems to me.
Finally, Russ Ramsland--who works closely with Sidney Powell on Dominion issues--is quoted in the most recent TGP election post (“The Battle This Time Is Over One Thing – Truth” – Cybersecurity Expert RUSS RAMSLAND Releases Exclusive Comments to The Gateway Pundit ) stating inter alia :
You will soon be reading things about me and my organization from the Washington Post. Other media outlets are sure to follow. These accusations are intended to malign me and my team in the hopes that their audience will believe what we are doing is wrong. The more outlandish the accusations, the more likely it is that they know the conclusions we may eventually reach are true. Ultimately, they want us to quit the job because they do not want us to release our findings. My team is one of many investigating the last election, and the media will attack every single one to prevent the truth from coming out.
Rather than accepting misleading media “hit pieces” in an ongoing campaign to undermine these investigations, we simply ask citizens to keep an open mind, examine the information and forensic evidence we release, and arrive at their own conclusions. We do not intend to be intimidated out of completing the investigation.
So, the investigations continue to advance and to make progress. Polling by Rasmussen shows that the American public is continuing to assimilate the evidence in a broadbrush way. There's still plenty of time between now and Election 2020. We're already seeing, I believe, results of these developments in AZ. The two Dem senators from AZ are breaking ranks on several issues, and I attribute that to their perception that the legitimacy of their elections may be called into question--by AZ voters. The same may hold true in other states, as well. While this may never present us with perfect justice or a dream outcome--doubtful--there remains hope for accountability on several levels.
UPDATE: H/T to Thomas Lifson, genial editor of AmThinker, who today points to an article with numerous links at The Election Wizard. It's one of those "one weird trick" kinda things, and it extrapolates to the national level what I referred to above:
Census reveals weird anomaly: Shows millions less voted in 2020 election than official tally
Here's how that works:
US Census data released last week called into question the official vote tally from the 2020 election. As part of the Census, the government collects data on citizens who self-report as having voted in presidential elections. The collected data shows an unusual anomaly in the reported results.
According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000 . On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million . That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.
Speaking to pollster Richard Baris during an episode of “Inside the Numbers,” lawyer Robert Barnes said historically, the Census tends to “pin on the nose” the recorded vote numbers with the actual results. In other words, often the two data sets reasonably match.
Sorry, but I haven't plowed through the data to find exactly where those four million extra votes turn up, but here's the one clue from the article:
Barnes pointed out the Census data also calls into question a number of contested states too.
For example, in Georgia, the bureau recorded roughly 4.8 million voting, while official results show slightly less than 5 million. Barnes said the discrepancy is consistent with claims that there were roughly 100k questionable ballots cast in Georgia.
Pollster Richard Baris stated many election experts have often viewed the Census data as generally reliable. Yet, for some reason, some experts have now flipped the script, claiming the 2020 data is the result of a Census “blunder.”
For some weird reason ...