Don Surber's Interesting Recession Theory

Just now, practically, Don Surber has published a post which presents a big picture theory of what’s going on with this recession. I’m not sure I buy it in the form that Don presents it, but a modified version might be plausible. Here’s the key part, which summarizes the basic idea:

Biden got the recession he wanted

…

The truth is this is a recession that will likely last longer than any in the past 40 years.

Bloomberg reported, "The 100 Wealthiest Americans Lost $622 Billion Since November."

Those are paper losses that don't matter until you cash in. And considering the trillions they raked in under President Trump, the richest 100 don't mind if they lose a trillion or so to get rid of him. 

We all saw this coming because we all know Biden's anti-capitalist policies would undo the Trump recovery. That was the plan. Democrats want another Great Depression because they believe this will allow them to take over the country once and for all. 

And most of those richest 100 support that. They believe they will have a place at the table, as do the LGBT crowd. History shows this to be folly.

…

So, there’s the theory, short and sweet. In support of it I’ll cite one factor that Don doesn’t stress sufficiently, or not explicitly. That factor is simply that the Zhou regime hit the ground running, presenting a policy agenda that was far radical and destructive than that of any previous US government—or, not since the Great Society. This radical agenda embraces both domestic and foreign policy. Even allowing for the fact that not all of the agenda has made it through Congress and that at least some legal roadblocks have been thrown up—mostly ineffectual, we’re seeing the results and those results are getting predictable feedback in the polls. We’re also seeing predictable economic and social effects.

The question is, Has this been deliberate—a planned recession—or did the Dems simply calculate that they could survive a recession and retain control? In other words, a recession wasn’t necessarily desired but was considered a manageable risk. The difficulty in assessing the alternatives here is that we’re dealing with deranged ideologues. I tend to the view that a recession was considered a manageable risk, But that Don is correct that this view is “folly.” The Dems own this recession, no matter what KD may say (No, The Economy Will NOT Be OK), and they will not be able to turn this into a Green New Deal because the associated pain will be too closely linked to specific and deeply unpopular policies.

My criticism of KD’s anti-Trumpism is not so much that Trump shares none of the blame, but that KD is unrealistic in what he believes a president can accomplish in domestic policy when Congress is united in its desire to spend wildly.