CVD: Covid Versus Gene Therapy

Karl Denninger obviously spends a lot of time scanning medical articles, and he’s come up with a fascinating study out of Brazil—specifically from the major city of Belo Horizonte:

Go Ahead, Keep Being Stupid

The study, indirectly, addresses an issue that I’ve wondered about for some time: Do the various gene therapy injections actually mimic—in their side effects—some of the effects of Covid-the-disease? Take the issue of cardio-vascular disease (CVD). We’re told by experts like Peter McCullough (and others) that Covid-the-disease, as opposed to the early stage of viral infection, is essentially a vascular disease. It’s the spike protein’s assault on the vascular system in the lungs that leads to the pneumonia like disease that ends up killing people. At the same time, we’ve learned that among the most prominent side effects of the injections have been various forms of CVD.

The Brazilian study was an examination of CVD statistics for “epidemiological weeks 10-48, 2020”. In other words, it covered most of 2020, through November. That includes most of the first year of the “pandemic” but does not include any period during which gene therapy injections were administered. If Covid-the-disease leads to CVD related mortality, then we’d expect a higher mortality rate during 2020 as compared to the control period: 2015-2019. The results?

Results: We found no changes in CVD mortality rates (RiR 1.01, 95%CI 0.96-1.06).

Now, that’s not totally conclusive, for a reason that KD points to: sub-clinical CVD may not crop up in the stats for some months, or perhaps even longer. Nevertheless, based on what we’ve learned about the side effects of the injections—including the relatively short time frame in which the side effects have been appearing so far—we would expect that the researchers in Brazil would have noticed some change during the nearly one year period from the end of their study to today. And they haven’t. By comparison, even using the very low-ball VAERS figures for about the same time period post vaccine as the the Brazilian study covers pre-vaccine, the difference is notable. The conclusion that Covid-the-disease—for whatever long term effects it may cause—is probably less of a CVD event risk than are the injections is a very reasonable one at this point.

KD concludes with some reflections that are speculative and anecdotal, but nevertheless interesting for all that—especially in that they track prognostications of noted experts such as Michael Yeadon and Geerd Vanden Bossche. Some of KD’s assertions probably go beyond what we know at this point, but are worth considering:

… the jabs are killing and severely-injuring people, and not a few of them either.  If your particular "circle of friends and acquaintances" hasn't seen a spike of severe injuries, disability and mortality yet -- I'll make a prediction: It will.

People who I know reasonably well that scoffed at my "best guess" of severe and worse (mortal) injury from these jabs, which [he has revised] … from about 1 in a thousand to around one in five hundred to one in a hundred are now emailing me and saying "you know, you may be right" as suddenly one, two or three people, many in otherwise good health, either "died unexpectedly" or suffered a debilitating and presumed permanent event. All of them were jabbed.  Where are the same events among the non-jabbed controls?  Entirely absent.

I still can't give you odds on this that I'm willing to defend but since January the direction of those odds has been one way -- and its not improving.  What's especially dangerous is that there is plenty of reason from the original data to believe repeated insults with additional jabs have an exponential adverse event rate.  We do not know the exponent, but the evidence from the first two is that it is there and it is greater than 1.0 -- in fact, it may be very materially greater than 1.0, perhaps as high as 10.

The next two sentences are important:

Sub-clinical cardiac damage is bad news folks.  Most CVD is sub-clinical right up until its not, and takes years or decades to develop into symptomatic disease.  In nearly every case the person who gets nailed has few or no symptoms until they have a "breakthrough" event like a heart attack or serious angina.  The data from Brazil confirms what we already knew -- by the time that happens there's nothing you can do; medical intervention at that point is ineffective in reducing the death rate; it is at best palliative while making the medical system wealthy at your expense.

This next paragraph is where I think KD may go beyond the evidence that we have at present. I’m not saying he’s wrong. Recall that in the preceding paragraph, KD pointed out that it can take years for sub-clinical cardiac damage to develop into symptomatic disease. The Brazilian evidence appears to confirm that Covid-the-disease doesn’t cause CVD events in the relatively short term of about one year. We do know, however, that it does attack the vascular system. There may be other explanations for the data—such as, that the damage from the disease is less immediately traumatic than the damage from the injections, and thus doesn’t manifest in the shorter term to the same degree that we’re seeing with the injections, from VAERS reporting. Another reason that we don’t know exactly what’s going on is because, as Ryan Cole (and others) point out, we’re not doing the autopsies that we should be doing. As KD says a bit later, “the longer-term damage is yet to be determined,” which goes for both the disease as well as the injections:

But Covid-19 infection does not contribute to this; it simply doesn't.  It didn't in Brazil and humans are humans.  I think we can fairly assume why that is: If it gets you and kills you then it does it right then and there; if it doesn't statistically-speaking, cardiac damage is not at issue.

But the jabs, on the other hand, do screw a decent percentage of people right up front and the longer-term damage is yet to be determined.  Statements by people like Fauci that "if nothing bad happens in 2 weeks nothing will" are flat-out lies; there are plenty of examples of people having strokes or heart attacks anywhere from a few weeks to a few months post jab, and they are people who have no risk factors for same and are too young to fit the common profile.

Go ahead folks, commit suicide.

The huge jump in mortality from CVD events among younger males in the UK—documented by UK government stats—is confirmation. We know here in the US that similar side effects are occurring at wildly elevated rates in the same demographic. This is confirmation of KD’s argument.