Dr. Robert Malone journeyed to Alaska for the Alaska Covid Early Treatment Medical Summit. He linked two excellent presentations and one thought provoking study from ueber mainstream science journal Nature. Let’s get right to it.
I couldn’t figure out how to embed Rumble here so you’ll have to follow the link to this video. It’s well worth it, and it’s only about 9 minutes long. As you can see, this presentation is by a Canadian doctor—formerly an ER doctor. Her presentation focuses on her experience with presentations in the ER of vaxxed adults who, when tested because of their symptoms, turned up with sky high D-Dimer tests (think: blood clotting). The topic is necessarily technical, but the doctor is articulate, organized, and uses slides effectively.
The next presentation is longer, but still compact, at 33 minutes. The presenter is a family practitioner. She covers her practice experience of most of the topics you can imagine arising in that type of practice regarding Covid and the vaccines. She has quite a few sharp observations, all in everyday non-technical language. While the conference was about early treatment, she also discusses people she has treated with long term problems—both from Covid the disease as well as from the injections.
Here’s a direct link to Youtube:
I’m listening while I write and she offered an anecdote from a military contact. In 2020 there were 20 military deaths from Covid. In 2021 there have already been 88 instances of myocarditis, which carries a high probability of death within 5 years. She also discusses patients who were coerced by employers and suffered severe effects.
Now, the article from Nature":
Here’s the abstract, skipping some of the authorial and other information. If you think the consistent pathophysiological alterations following injections of these gene therapy meds is a bad thing, you’re right:
Abstract
Large-scale COVID-19 vaccinations are currently underway in many countries in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection. Single-cell mRNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and 28 days after the first inoculation also revealed consistent alterations in gene expression of many different immune cell types. Reduction of CD8+ T cells and increase in classic monocyte contents were exemplary. Moreover, scRNA-seq revealed increased NF-κB signaling and reduced type I interferon responses, which were confirmed by biological assays and also had been reported to occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection with aggravating symptoms. Altogether, our study recommends additional caution when vaccinating people with pre-existing clinical conditions, including diabetes, electrolyte imbalances, renal dysfunction, and coagulation disorders.
My first observation is that the type of pre-existing clinical conditions described are exactly the type that are more likely to be more common in older, “at risk” patients who have been stampeded into getting these injections.
Next, here are a few excerpts from the body of the article that expand on the bolded portions of the abstract, but in more expressive language:
To our surprise, we observed quite consistent pathophysiological changes regarding electrolyte contents, coagulation profiles, renal function as well as cholesterol and glucose metabolic-related features, as if these people had experienced an infection with SARS-CoV-2. In addition, PBMCs scRNA-seq results also indicated consistent reductions in CD8+ T cells and increases in monocyte contents, as well as enhanced NF-κB inflammatory signaling, which also mimicked responses after infection. Surprisingly, type I interferon responses, which had been linked to reduced damages after SARS-CoV-2 infection and milder symptoms, appeared to be reduced after vaccination, at least by 28 days post the 1st inoculation. This might suggest that in the short-term (1 month) after vaccination, a person’s immune system is in a non-privileged state, and may require more protection.
Let’s see, for a month after injection your immune system is in a “non-privileged” state—you’re at greater risk. Then the effectiveness starts going down hill until it vanishes—in anywhere from two to six months, depending on … well, we don’t really know. No, that wasn’t a good news, bad news gag.
The rest of the article focuses in highly technical terms on the effect on the immune system. Here’s a summary:
Results indicated that vaccination, in addition to stimulating the generation of neutralizing antibodies, also influenced various health indicators including those related to diabetes, renal dysfunction, cholesterol metabolism, coagulation problems, electrolyte imbalance, in a way as if the volunteers experienced an infection. scRNA-seq of PBMCs from volunteers before and after vaccination revealed dramatic changes in immune cell gene expression, not only echoing some of the clinical laboratory measures but also suggestive of increased NF-κB-related inflammatory responses, which turned out to be mainly taking place in classical monocytes. Vaccination also increased classical monocyte contents. Moreover, the gene set positively contributing to MVS scores, also known to be associated with severe symptom development, was highly expressed in monocytes. Type I interferon (IFN-α/β) responses, supposedly beneficial against COVID-19, were downregulated after vaccination. In addition, the negative MVS genes were highly expressed in lymphocytes (T, B, and NK cells), yet showed reduced expression after vaccination. Together, these data suggested that after vaccination, at least by day 28, other than generation of neutralizing antibodies, people’s immune systems, including those of lymphocytes and monocytes, were perhaps in a more vulnerable state.
Make of it what you will. It sounds disturbing to me.
Now, polling.
NBC published some polling results. CTH has some very full excerpts from the published results, in tabular form. For our purposes I want to focus mainly on the Covid related results, partly because that was, until recently the only bright spot for Zhou.
First of all, we’re talking NBC—so, you can assume the results were slanted. But even Chuck Todd didn’t try to make a silk purse out of this sow’s ear. Or, here’s another way of putting it:
Good Sunday morning —
We have a brand new NBC News poll out this morning that's filled with tough news for Democrats.
The country is headed —
In the right direction: 22
On wrong track: 71
President Biden’s job performance —
Approve: 42
Disapprove: 54 pic.twitter.com/zlQr36lzzt— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress)October 31, 2021
That wrong track response included 48% of Dems. There is no good news for Dems in that.
But now, on to Covid …
Mandates? Strong favor/oppose: 34/41
Vote for politician supporting mandates? More/Less likely: 32/40
Vax young kids? Yes/No/Wait: 27/26/38
These results suggest that there is a definite cap to the percentage of people who can be fooled all the time. Given that 70% of respondents claimed to have been vaxed, these results strongly suggest three things:
People are catching on to what’s really behind the injections;
A significant portion of those vaxxed were either pressured or now may feel that they were fooled into it;
The whole idea of such mandates are offensive to at least half of Americans, with 80% of that half feeling strongly about the issue.
This has yet to play out, but the road ahead is likely to be a rocky one.
Reading this post makes me want to cry. I am not vaccinated, but my brother just got his booster shot and his 20 something grandson caved and got the shot when his employer offered him $1,500. Most of my friends are getting the boosters. I had hoped they wouldn't. I don't even mention bad side effects to anyone anymore, but I am worried. I believe the vaccinated and the unvaccinated are both at risk and the government is making this worse.