Covid Injections Cause Super High Spike Levels

Commenter Hemsley Hawes has forwarded the link to Dr. Robert Malone’s substack. Malone seems to have scaled back his writing lately but has continued—unsurprisingly—to point out significant research regarding Covid and the Big Pharma injections. Today he writes to summarize a scientific paper on the injections—and is alarmed by what he read:

A Health Public Policy Nightmare

Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for two months in lymph node germinal centers... protein production of spike is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients!

The actual article runs under a title that’s pretty much impossible for non-specialists to grok:

Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination Cell. Published:January 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.018

Malone first presents the four “highlights” of the article that the journal provides, but then adds a “hidden highlight”—the one that’s in his subtitle:

Highlights (per the journal)

• Vaccination confers broader IgG binding of variant RBDs than SARS-CoV-2 infection

• Imprinting from initial antigen exposures alters IgG responses to viral variants

• Histology of mRNA vaccinee lymph nodes shows abundant germinal centers

• Vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for weeks in lymph node germinal centers

The hidden highlight (lede) buried in this peer reviewed paper is that protein production of spike in people vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine is higher than those of severely ill COVID-19 patients! A person might ask, “How could that be?” In order to understand this, we must carefully analyze what the study shows.

This isn’t exactly news. My recollection is that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, in particular, has emphasized the open ended nature of spike production after a person is injected. I believe other scientists have also noted this. Malone himself notes that production of the spike protein has been documented up to 60 days after injection—but no studies have attempted to measure it after 60 days. The result is that large amounts of this highly pathogenic protein—which is associated with many of the harmful effects of Covid-the-disease—are being produced by the bodies of injected persons. The amounts of spike produced are higher than the amounts found in severely ill Covid patients—as documented in this study.

It’s no wonder, then, that Malone terms this, in his title, a “Public Policy Nightmare”. In the rest of his substack Malone focuses on the how avoidable this was—if proper testing of this novel medication had been conducted. He expresses himself strongly:

This study asserts that the mRNA and the spike protein produced persists for weeks in lymph node germinal centers in human patients. Having worked with mRNA for decades, I can attest that this is highly unusual.

…

Knowing what we know about the spike protein in these vaccines, the study quantitatively measured spike protein levels in plasma after vaccination. Which, it turns out, are higher than the levels observed in a person with a severe COVID-19 infection. Just to write it, the fact that this only now being discovered or it it was known, released to the public is criminal in my opinion. This should have been characterized long ago, including prior to beginning human clinical trials.

That this has not been published or investigated more demonstrates the gross regulatory dereliction of duty by Pfizer, Biointech, Moderna, NIAID VRC and that whole crew. Using these vaccines, which include pseudouridine without fully understanding the implications and without the FDA requiring a complete pre-clinical toxicology regulatory package, including long-term follow-up, as is done with any other unique chemical or adjuvant additive is shocking. Then there is the novel use of the unique nano particles being used in these vaccines, which also were only marginally assessed, as shown by the Japanese Pfizer data.

He concludes:

This Substack article has only skimmed the surface of the implications of this paper in terms of both the science and the malfeasance on the part of our government and pharmaceutical corporations. There is more to come on this issue.

What’s particularly alarming is the experimental based confirmation this article provides to what dissenting scientists have been warning about for at least the past year—or longer. Those warnings, and this confirmation, come to us now in the context of high levels of excess mortality across most highly injected populations. And so, “There is more to come on this issue.” Dismantling the Covid Regime—as we see happening more and more frequently across the country—will not be the end of this story. There needs to be a reckoning and I think that will happen.