Covid Injection Update: Death, Injury, Mandates

Euro Edition

The news in the US is that Pfizer wants to inject all the kids. With that in mind there are some interesting stats coming from official sources in the UK and EU. None of this should come as a surprise.

Let’s start with the UK. This article is focused on explaining statistical methodology, so I’ve edited those parts to give the bottom line:

British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot: gov’t report

Data from Britain's Office for National Statistics show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts.

I think you get the idea. Who in their right mind would have their kids injected? It’s child abuse, at best. Yes, it’s true that an increase from a low numerical level probably remains low overall in raw number terms, but it’s insane to take that risk:

LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) has released data indicating that children who received the COVID-19 jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than that of their un-jabbed counterparts.

In December, the ONS published age-standardized data on the mortality rates of individuals in 5-year age sets in Britain, grouped by their “vaccination” status for the COVID-19 shots. The data accounts for the period from January 1 to October 31, 2021.

…

The data show a stark increase in deaths among children both single- and double-jabbed compared to their un-jabbed counterparts. For children aged 15–19, the risk of death increases by almost double if they take the first shot and by over three times if they take the second.

10–14-year-olds, on the other hand, run the risk of dying almost by a factor of ten following the first dose while the second dose brings a 51.8 times greater risk of death than if they had remained un-jabbed.

On average, it means that children between 10 and 19 years of age who had received at least one shot of the COVID jabs had a 3.7 times greater chance of dying between January and October last year.

Myocarditis is known to be a side effect—a “rare” side effect. But why would you want to increase your risk of suffering a side effect that is otherwise “rare” unless you’ve really closely considered the risk/benefit equation? And how many doctors are really helping their patients make an informed decision?

I picked this item up via TGP. The stats, once again, are from official sources, but are not broken down by injection status. However, the German stats are broken down for a specific age range: 16-39. You be the judge of what’s going on:

Dissident Covid Report #3: Why are Myocarditis Rates Surging in Europe?

New groundbreaking data. Myocarditis rates up 30-75% nationally.

Key excerpts—there’s much more at the link:

I've been trying to find national rates of myocarditis in Canada or the United States for several weeks but haven't been able to find a reliable dataset. However, I came across two countries that appear to be closely tracking this issue: Germany and France.

The results are damning. 

First, take a look at Germany:

Since vaccines were widely distributed last year, myocarditis rates surged more than 75%.

One might say, "Covid causes myocarditis. That's what could account for the rise."

Except, myocarditis cases dropped at the start of the Covid pandemic (Jan 2020) and kept declining for a few months afterwards (May - Sept 2020).

What happened in the middle of last year that could have resulted in a large increase in myocarditis cases?

Perhaps the widespread administration of a medical intervention that causes a significant number of myocarditis cases (in specific demographics)?

Maybe Germany is just an outlier and I'm senselessly speculating. Look at France:

In 2021, myocarditis cases rose 31% — the highest in several years.

The orange and red codes are both for myocarditis (the red is for myocarditis cases that are unspecified).

Again, anytime one brings up myocarditis from the vaccine, opponents reflexively counter with the fact that Covid also causes myocarditis.

But as this bar graph shows, myocarditis cases fell in the first year of the pandemic.

They only rose in 2021, the year vaccines were rolled out to the public.

It's impossible to prove with 100% certainty, but this data strongly indicates that mass vaccination in these European nations has led to surging rates of myocarditis (cases are almost certainly concentrated in young men under the age of 40).

...

But among young men, the vaccine-induced myocarditis signal is incontrovertible. And by best available evidence, it occurs at a HIGHER frequency than infection-induced myocarditis in that age/gender demographic. 

As a robust analysis by Oxford researchers found last month, Pfizer doses 2 & 3 and Moderna doses 1 & 2 are associated with post-vaccine myocarditis rates that exceed the rates of infection-induced myocarditis in men under 40.

…

For detractors who think myocarditis is no big deal and most cases are "mild," consider a TYPICAL case of myocarditis (regardless of the cause):

1) 3-6 months of limited physical activity. No sports or athletic competition. Even carrying heavy textbooks and walking up stairs can be prohibited.

2) Being placed on medications such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors that can have negative side effects

3) Scars in heart region visible on an MRI scan

4) Life-long risk of cardiac complications

So, yes most cases of myocarditis from the vaccine will be relatively "mild" compared to a “serious” case (heart failure or death) — just like chronic depression is relatively "mild" compared to schizophrenia.

Lastly, the Epoch Times has a longish but very interesting article from the UK—republished at Zerohedge. The title is really true, and it makes you wonder what the authorities over there have learned. They’re trying to CYA, as you’ll see, but the implications are clear. This does not appear to be a political dodge by BoJo—it’s an informed decision by the health authorities:

England Halts Vaccine Mandates For Health And Care Home Workers

Authored by Lily Zhou via The Epoch Times,

England’s CCP virus vaccine mandates for health care and care home workers are set to be scrapped, subject to consultation and parliamentary approval, the UK’s Health Secretary Sajid Javid said on Monday.

Note in what follows the key to the fact that this is not a partisan political decision:

The latest government U-turn came just three days before the deadline by which National Health Service (NHS) and other health care workers would have to get their first doses to avoid redeployment or termination.

The deadline will no longer apply while the government carries out a two-week consultation on the proposed policy reversal before putting a motion to Parliament for approval.

However, the vote in Parliament could be a formality as the main opposition Labour Party - which supported the mandates - said it will also support the government on their reversal.

In other words, both parties are backing away from ownership, while still trying to cover themselves for having fired nearly 20,000 health workers. Yeah, in the middle of a “pandemic”. Brilliant, right? But get this:

… Javid insisted that health care workers have a “professional duty” to take the vaccines, saying those “who would not do the responsible thing and choose to remain unvaccinated” were “choosing to walk away from their jobs in health and care.”

…

According to NHS weekly data, by Jan. 23, around 5 percent (77,591) of England’s NHS staff members and 18 percent (193,354) of social care workers had not received any CCP virus vaccines.

Javid said the government estimates 19,300 workers have already lost their jobs due to the care home vaccine mandate, which came into effect in November 2021. These workers are now free to reapply to their old jobs, but the health secretary declined to offer them continuity of service and pension contributions, saying it was “their choice” to leave their jobs rather than “do the professional thing” and get vaccinated.

Javid said the government “makes no apology” for proposing the mandates when the Delta variant of the CCP virus was dominant, arguing it was the right policy at the time as “the weight of clinical evidence in favour of vaccination as a condition of deployment outweighed the risks to the workforce.”

Javid offered a variety of face saving rationales and said they might reinstate a mandate in the future. This in the context of a government that has admitted to attempting to scare people into the injections using false “information”—propaganda. Javid also received criticism from some MPs, who called his rhetoric directed at health care workers “a disgrace.”

And so has been the entire Covid Regime.